Cargando…
Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Data on epidemiology, costs, and outcomes of burn-related injuries presenting at emergency departments (EDs) are scarce. To obtain such information, a questionnaire study with an adequate response rate is imperative. There is evidence that optimized strategies can increase patient partic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1 |
_version_ | 1783277467264352256 |
---|---|
author | Goei, H. Wijnen, B. F. M. Mans, S. de Jongh, M. A. C. van der Vlies, C. H. Polinder, S. van Loey, N. E. E. van Baar, M. E. |
author_facet | Goei, H. Wijnen, B. F. M. Mans, S. de Jongh, M. A. C. van der Vlies, C. H. Polinder, S. van Loey, N. E. E. van Baar, M. E. |
author_sort | Goei, H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data on epidemiology, costs, and outcomes of burn-related injuries presenting at emergency departments (EDs) are scarce. To obtain such information, a questionnaire study with an adequate response rate is imperative. There is evidence that optimized strategies can increase patient participation. However, it is unclear whether this applies to burn patients in an ED setting. The objective of this feasibility study was to optimize and evaluate patient recruitment strategy and follow-up methods in patients with burn injuries presenting at EDs. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up, patients with burn-related injuries attending two large EDs during a 3-month study period were included. Eligible patients were quasi-randomly allocated to a standard or optimized recruitment strategy by week of the ED visit. The standard recruitment strategy consisted of an invitation letter to participate, an informed consent form, a questionnaire, and a franked return envelope. The optimized recruitment strategy was complemented by a stamped returned envelope, monetary incentive, sending a second copy of the questionnaire, and a reminder by telephone in non-responders. Response rates were calculated, and questionnaires were used to assess treatment, costs, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included of which 85 were eligible for the follow-up study. There was a higher response rate at 2 months in the optimized versus the standard recruitment strategy (43.6% vs. 20.0%; OR = 3.1 (95% CI 1.1–8.8)), although overall response is low. Non-response analyses showed no significant differences in patient, burn injury or treatment characteristics between responders versus non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that response rates can be increased with an optimized, but more labor-intensive recruitment strategy, although further optimization of recruitment and follow-up is needed. It is feasible to assess epidemiology, treatment, and costs after burn-related ED contacts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5678580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56785802017-11-17 Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study Goei, H. Wijnen, B. F. M. Mans, S. de Jongh, M. A. C. van der Vlies, C. H. Polinder, S. van Loey, N. E. E. van Baar, M. E. Burns Trauma Research Article BACKGROUND: Data on epidemiology, costs, and outcomes of burn-related injuries presenting at emergency departments (EDs) are scarce. To obtain such information, a questionnaire study with an adequate response rate is imperative. There is evidence that optimized strategies can increase patient participation. However, it is unclear whether this applies to burn patients in an ED setting. The objective of this feasibility study was to optimize and evaluate patient recruitment strategy and follow-up methods in patients with burn injuries presenting at EDs. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up, patients with burn-related injuries attending two large EDs during a 3-month study period were included. Eligible patients were quasi-randomly allocated to a standard or optimized recruitment strategy by week of the ED visit. The standard recruitment strategy consisted of an invitation letter to participate, an informed consent form, a questionnaire, and a franked return envelope. The optimized recruitment strategy was complemented by a stamped returned envelope, monetary incentive, sending a second copy of the questionnaire, and a reminder by telephone in non-responders. Response rates were calculated, and questionnaires were used to assess treatment, costs, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included of which 85 were eligible for the follow-up study. There was a higher response rate at 2 months in the optimized versus the standard recruitment strategy (43.6% vs. 20.0%; OR = 3.1 (95% CI 1.1–8.8)), although overall response is low. Non-response analyses showed no significant differences in patient, burn injury or treatment characteristics between responders versus non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that response rates can be increased with an optimized, but more labor-intensive recruitment strategy, although further optimization of recruitment and follow-up is needed. It is feasible to assess epidemiology, treatment, and costs after burn-related ED contacts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5678580/ /pubmed/29152518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Goei, H. Wijnen, B. F. M. Mans, S. de Jongh, M. A. C. van der Vlies, C. H. Polinder, S. van Loey, N. E. E. van Baar, M. E. Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study |
title | Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study |
title_full | Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study |
title_short | Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study |
title_sort | follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goeih followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy AT wijnenbfm followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy AT manss followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy AT dejonghmac followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy AT vandervliesch followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy AT polinders followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy AT vanloeynee followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy AT vanbaarme followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy |