Cargando…

Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Data on epidemiology, costs, and outcomes of burn-related injuries presenting at emergency departments (EDs) are scarce. To obtain such information, a questionnaire study with an adequate response rate is imperative. There is evidence that optimized strategies can increase patient partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goei, H., Wijnen, B. F. M., Mans, S., de Jongh, M. A. C., van der Vlies, C. H., Polinder, S., van Loey, N. E. E., van Baar, M. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1
_version_ 1783277467264352256
author Goei, H.
Wijnen, B. F. M.
Mans, S.
de Jongh, M. A. C.
van der Vlies, C. H.
Polinder, S.
van Loey, N. E. E.
van Baar, M. E.
author_facet Goei, H.
Wijnen, B. F. M.
Mans, S.
de Jongh, M. A. C.
van der Vlies, C. H.
Polinder, S.
van Loey, N. E. E.
van Baar, M. E.
author_sort Goei, H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data on epidemiology, costs, and outcomes of burn-related injuries presenting at emergency departments (EDs) are scarce. To obtain such information, a questionnaire study with an adequate response rate is imperative. There is evidence that optimized strategies can increase patient participation. However, it is unclear whether this applies to burn patients in an ED setting. The objective of this feasibility study was to optimize and evaluate patient recruitment strategy and follow-up methods in patients with burn injuries presenting at EDs. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up, patients with burn-related injuries attending two large EDs during a 3-month study period were included. Eligible patients were quasi-randomly allocated to a standard or optimized recruitment strategy by week of the ED visit. The standard recruitment strategy consisted of an invitation letter to participate, an informed consent form, a questionnaire, and a franked return envelope. The optimized recruitment strategy was complemented by a stamped returned envelope, monetary incentive, sending a second copy of the questionnaire, and a reminder by telephone in non-responders. Response rates were calculated, and questionnaires were used to assess treatment, costs, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included of which 85 were eligible for the follow-up study. There was a higher response rate at 2 months in the optimized versus the standard recruitment strategy (43.6% vs. 20.0%; OR = 3.1 (95% CI 1.1–8.8)), although overall response is low. Non-response analyses showed no significant differences in patient, burn injury or treatment characteristics between responders versus non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that response rates can be increased with an optimized, but more labor-intensive recruitment strategy, although further optimization of recruitment and follow-up is needed. It is feasible to assess epidemiology, treatment, and costs after burn-related ED contacts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56785802017-11-17 Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study Goei, H. Wijnen, B. F. M. Mans, S. de Jongh, M. A. C. van der Vlies, C. H. Polinder, S. van Loey, N. E. E. van Baar, M. E. Burns Trauma Research Article BACKGROUND: Data on epidemiology, costs, and outcomes of burn-related injuries presenting at emergency departments (EDs) are scarce. To obtain such information, a questionnaire study with an adequate response rate is imperative. There is evidence that optimized strategies can increase patient participation. However, it is unclear whether this applies to burn patients in an ED setting. The objective of this feasibility study was to optimize and evaluate patient recruitment strategy and follow-up methods in patients with burn injuries presenting at EDs. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up, patients with burn-related injuries attending two large EDs during a 3-month study period were included. Eligible patients were quasi-randomly allocated to a standard or optimized recruitment strategy by week of the ED visit. The standard recruitment strategy consisted of an invitation letter to participate, an informed consent form, a questionnaire, and a franked return envelope. The optimized recruitment strategy was complemented by a stamped returned envelope, monetary incentive, sending a second copy of the questionnaire, and a reminder by telephone in non-responders. Response rates were calculated, and questionnaires were used to assess treatment, costs, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included of which 85 were eligible for the follow-up study. There was a higher response rate at 2 months in the optimized versus the standard recruitment strategy (43.6% vs. 20.0%; OR = 3.1 (95% CI 1.1–8.8)), although overall response is low. Non-response analyses showed no significant differences in patient, burn injury or treatment characteristics between responders versus non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that response rates can be increased with an optimized, but more labor-intensive recruitment strategy, although further optimization of recruitment and follow-up is needed. It is feasible to assess epidemiology, treatment, and costs after burn-related ED contacts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5678580/ /pubmed/29152518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goei, H.
Wijnen, B. F. M.
Mans, S.
de Jongh, M. A. C.
van der Vlies, C. H.
Polinder, S.
van Loey, N. E. E.
van Baar, M. E.
Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
title Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
title_full Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
title_short Follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
title_sort follow-up in patients with a burn-related emergency department visit: a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0100-1
work_keys_str_mv AT goeih followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy
AT wijnenbfm followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy
AT manss followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy
AT dejonghmac followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy
AT vandervliesch followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy
AT polinders followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy
AT vanloeynee followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy
AT vanbaarme followupinpatientswithaburnrelatedemergencydepartmentvisitafeasibilitystudy