Cargando…

Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027

Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGovern, Alan M., Androga, Grace O., Knight, Daniel R., Watson, Mark W., Elliott, Briony, Foster, Niki F., Chang, Barbara J., Riley, Thomas V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187658
Descripción
Sumario:Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is commonly found in neonatal livestock both in Australia and elsewhere. Zoonotic transmission of C. difficile has been suggested previously. Most human diagnostic tests will not detect A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile because they focus on detection of toxin A and/or B. We performed a prospective investigation into the prevalence and genetic characteristics of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in symptomatic humans. All glutamate dehydrogenase or toxin B gene positive faecal specimens from symptomatic inpatients over 30 days (n = 43) were cultured by enrichment, and C. difficile PCR ribotypes (RTs) and toxin gene profiles determined. From 39 culture-positive specimens, 43 C. difficile isolates were recovered, including two A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolates. This corresponded to an A(−)B(−)CDT(+) prevalence of 2/35 (5.7%) isolates possessing at least one toxin, 2/10 (20%) A(−)B(−) isolates, 2/3 CDT(+) isolates and 1/28 (3.6%) presumed true CDI cases. No link to Australian livestock-associated C. difficile was found. Neither A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolate was the predominant A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strain found in Australia, RT 033, nor did they belong to toxinotype XI. Previous reports infrequently describe A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in patients and strain collections but the prevalence of human A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile is rarely investigated. This study highlights the occurrence of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile in symptomatic patients, warranting further investigations of its role in human infection.