Cargando…

Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027

Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGovern, Alan M., Androga, Grace O., Knight, Daniel R., Watson, Mark W., Elliott, Briony, Foster, Niki F., Chang, Barbara J., Riley, Thomas V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187658
_version_ 1783277490457804800
author McGovern, Alan M.
Androga, Grace O.
Knight, Daniel R.
Watson, Mark W.
Elliott, Briony
Foster, Niki F.
Chang, Barbara J.
Riley, Thomas V.
author_facet McGovern, Alan M.
Androga, Grace O.
Knight, Daniel R.
Watson, Mark W.
Elliott, Briony
Foster, Niki F.
Chang, Barbara J.
Riley, Thomas V.
author_sort McGovern, Alan M.
collection PubMed
description Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is commonly found in neonatal livestock both in Australia and elsewhere. Zoonotic transmission of C. difficile has been suggested previously. Most human diagnostic tests will not detect A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile because they focus on detection of toxin A and/or B. We performed a prospective investigation into the prevalence and genetic characteristics of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in symptomatic humans. All glutamate dehydrogenase or toxin B gene positive faecal specimens from symptomatic inpatients over 30 days (n = 43) were cultured by enrichment, and C. difficile PCR ribotypes (RTs) and toxin gene profiles determined. From 39 culture-positive specimens, 43 C. difficile isolates were recovered, including two A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolates. This corresponded to an A(−)B(−)CDT(+) prevalence of 2/35 (5.7%) isolates possessing at least one toxin, 2/10 (20%) A(−)B(−) isolates, 2/3 CDT(+) isolates and 1/28 (3.6%) presumed true CDI cases. No link to Australian livestock-associated C. difficile was found. Neither A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolate was the predominant A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strain found in Australia, RT 033, nor did they belong to toxinotype XI. Previous reports infrequently describe A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in patients and strain collections but the prevalence of human A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile is rarely investigated. This study highlights the occurrence of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile in symptomatic patients, warranting further investigations of its role in human infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56787002017-11-18 Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 McGovern, Alan M. Androga, Grace O. Knight, Daniel R. Watson, Mark W. Elliott, Briony Foster, Niki F. Chang, Barbara J. Riley, Thomas V. PLoS One Research Article Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is commonly found in neonatal livestock both in Australia and elsewhere. Zoonotic transmission of C. difficile has been suggested previously. Most human diagnostic tests will not detect A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile because they focus on detection of toxin A and/or B. We performed a prospective investigation into the prevalence and genetic characteristics of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in symptomatic humans. All glutamate dehydrogenase or toxin B gene positive faecal specimens from symptomatic inpatients over 30 days (n = 43) were cultured by enrichment, and C. difficile PCR ribotypes (RTs) and toxin gene profiles determined. From 39 culture-positive specimens, 43 C. difficile isolates were recovered, including two A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolates. This corresponded to an A(−)B(−)CDT(+) prevalence of 2/35 (5.7%) isolates possessing at least one toxin, 2/10 (20%) A(−)B(−) isolates, 2/3 CDT(+) isolates and 1/28 (3.6%) presumed true CDI cases. No link to Australian livestock-associated C. difficile was found. Neither A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolate was the predominant A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strain found in Australia, RT 033, nor did they belong to toxinotype XI. Previous reports infrequently describe A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in patients and strain collections but the prevalence of human A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile is rarely investigated. This study highlights the occurrence of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile in symptomatic patients, warranting further investigations of its role in human infection. Public Library of Science 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5678700/ /pubmed/29117204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187658 Text en © 2017 McGovern et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McGovern, Alan M.
Androga, Grace O.
Knight, Daniel R.
Watson, Mark W.
Elliott, Briony
Foster, Niki F.
Chang, Barbara J.
Riley, Thomas V.
Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
title Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
title_full Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
title_fullStr Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
title_short Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
title_sort prevalence of binary toxin positive clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187658
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgovernalanm prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027
AT androgagraceo prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027
AT knightdanielr prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027
AT watsonmarkw prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027
AT elliottbriony prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027
AT fosternikif prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027
AT changbarbaraj prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027
AT rileythomasv prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027