Cargando…
Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027
Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187658 |
_version_ | 1783277490457804800 |
---|---|
author | McGovern, Alan M. Androga, Grace O. Knight, Daniel R. Watson, Mark W. Elliott, Briony Foster, Niki F. Chang, Barbara J. Riley, Thomas V. |
author_facet | McGovern, Alan M. Androga, Grace O. Knight, Daniel R. Watson, Mark W. Elliott, Briony Foster, Niki F. Chang, Barbara J. Riley, Thomas V. |
author_sort | McGovern, Alan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is commonly found in neonatal livestock both in Australia and elsewhere. Zoonotic transmission of C. difficile has been suggested previously. Most human diagnostic tests will not detect A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile because they focus on detection of toxin A and/or B. We performed a prospective investigation into the prevalence and genetic characteristics of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in symptomatic humans. All glutamate dehydrogenase or toxin B gene positive faecal specimens from symptomatic inpatients over 30 days (n = 43) were cultured by enrichment, and C. difficile PCR ribotypes (RTs) and toxin gene profiles determined. From 39 culture-positive specimens, 43 C. difficile isolates were recovered, including two A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolates. This corresponded to an A(−)B(−)CDT(+) prevalence of 2/35 (5.7%) isolates possessing at least one toxin, 2/10 (20%) A(−)B(−) isolates, 2/3 CDT(+) isolates and 1/28 (3.6%) presumed true CDI cases. No link to Australian livestock-associated C. difficile was found. Neither A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolate was the predominant A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strain found in Australia, RT 033, nor did they belong to toxinotype XI. Previous reports infrequently describe A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in patients and strain collections but the prevalence of human A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile is rarely investigated. This study highlights the occurrence of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile in symptomatic patients, warranting further investigations of its role in human infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5678700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56787002017-11-18 Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 McGovern, Alan M. Androga, Grace O. Knight, Daniel R. Watson, Mark W. Elliott, Briony Foster, Niki F. Chang, Barbara J. Riley, Thomas V. PLoS One Research Article Virulence of Clostridium difficile is primarily attributed to the large clostridial toxins A and B while the role of binary toxin (CDT) remains unclear. The prevalence of human strains of C. difficile possessing only CDT genes (A(−)B(−)CDT(+)) is generally low (< 5%), however, this genotype is commonly found in neonatal livestock both in Australia and elsewhere. Zoonotic transmission of C. difficile has been suggested previously. Most human diagnostic tests will not detect A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile because they focus on detection of toxin A and/or B. We performed a prospective investigation into the prevalence and genetic characteristics of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in symptomatic humans. All glutamate dehydrogenase or toxin B gene positive faecal specimens from symptomatic inpatients over 30 days (n = 43) were cultured by enrichment, and C. difficile PCR ribotypes (RTs) and toxin gene profiles determined. From 39 culture-positive specimens, 43 C. difficile isolates were recovered, including two A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolates. This corresponded to an A(−)B(−)CDT(+) prevalence of 2/35 (5.7%) isolates possessing at least one toxin, 2/10 (20%) A(−)B(−) isolates, 2/3 CDT(+) isolates and 1/28 (3.6%) presumed true CDI cases. No link to Australian livestock-associated C. difficile was found. Neither A(−)B(−)CDT(+) isolate was the predominant A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strain found in Australia, RT 033, nor did they belong to toxinotype XI. Previous reports infrequently describe A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile in patients and strain collections but the prevalence of human A(−)B(−)CDT(+) C. difficile is rarely investigated. This study highlights the occurrence of A(−)B(−)CDT(+) strains of C. difficile in symptomatic patients, warranting further investigations of its role in human infection. Public Library of Science 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5678700/ /pubmed/29117204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187658 Text en © 2017 McGovern et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McGovern, Alan M. Androga, Grace O. Knight, Daniel R. Watson, Mark W. Elliott, Briony Foster, Niki F. Chang, Barbara J. Riley, Thomas V. Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 |
title | Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 |
title_full | Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 |
title_short | Prevalence of binary toxin positive Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 |
title_sort | prevalence of binary toxin positive clostridium difficile in diarrhoeal humans in the absence of epidemic ribotype 027 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgovernalanm prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 AT androgagraceo prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 AT knightdanielr prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 AT watsonmarkw prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 AT elliottbriony prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 AT fosternikif prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 AT changbarbaraj prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 AT rileythomasv prevalenceofbinarytoxinpositiveclostridiumdifficileindiarrhoealhumansintheabsenceofepidemicribotype027 |