Cargando…
Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts is important as readers often make their first judgments based on the abstracts. This study aims to assess the reporting quality of psychiatry RCT abstracts published before and after the release of Consolidated Standards o...
Autores principales: | Song, Seung Yeon, Kim, Boyeon, Kim, Inhye, Kim, Sungeun, Kwon, Minjeong, Han, Changsu, Kim, Eunyoung |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187807 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals
por: Ghimire, Saurav, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Is there any quality improvement in the randomized controlled trial abstracts in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology after the publication of the CONSORT abstract guidelines in 2008?
por: Shin, Woo Jong, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Reporting quality for abstracts of randomised trials on child and adolescent depression prevention: a meta-epidemiological study on adherence to CONSORT for abstracts
por: Wiehn, Jascha, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reporting Quality of Journal Abstracts for Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials Before and After the Implementation of the CONSORT Extension for Abstracts
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Evaluation of quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials on procedural sedation in children after publication of CONSORT guidelines for abstracts: A systematic review
por: Bothra, Meenakshi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)