Cargando…

Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment

BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification systems for neuroblastoma patients consider clinical, histopathological, and genetic variables, and additional prognostic markers have been proposed in recent years. We here sought to select highly informative covariates in a multistep strategy based on consec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosswog, Carolina, Schmidt, Rene, Oberthuer, André, Juraeva, Dilafruz, Brors, Benedikt, Engesser, Anne, Kahlert, Yvonne, Volland, Ruth, Bartenhagen, Christoph, Simon, Thorsten, Berthold, Frank, Hero, Barbara, Faldum, Andreas, Fischer, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29091799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.09.006
_version_ 1783277498404962304
author Rosswog, Carolina
Schmidt, Rene
Oberthuer, André
Juraeva, Dilafruz
Brors, Benedikt
Engesser, Anne
Kahlert, Yvonne
Volland, Ruth
Bartenhagen, Christoph
Simon, Thorsten
Berthold, Frank
Hero, Barbara
Faldum, Andreas
Fischer, Matthias
author_facet Rosswog, Carolina
Schmidt, Rene
Oberthuer, André
Juraeva, Dilafruz
Brors, Benedikt
Engesser, Anne
Kahlert, Yvonne
Volland, Ruth
Bartenhagen, Christoph
Simon, Thorsten
Berthold, Frank
Hero, Barbara
Faldum, Andreas
Fischer, Matthias
author_sort Rosswog, Carolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification systems for neuroblastoma patients consider clinical, histopathological, and genetic variables, and additional prognostic markers have been proposed in recent years. We here sought to select highly informative covariates in a multistep strategy based on consecutive Cox regression models, resulting in a risk score that integrates hazard ratios of prognostic variables. METHODS: A cohort of 695 neuroblastoma patients was divided into a discovery set (n = 75) for multigene predictor generation, a training set (n = 411) for risk score development, and a validation set (n = 209). Relevant prognostic variables were identified by stepwise multivariable L1-penalized least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression, followed by backward selection in multivariable Cox regression, and then integrated into a novel risk score. RESULTS: The variables stage, age, MYCN status, and two multigene predictors, NB-th24 and NB-th44, were selected as independent prognostic markers by LASSO Cox regression analysis. Following backward selection, only the multigene predictors were retained in the final model. Integration of these classifiers in a risk scoring system distinguished three patient subgroups that differed substantially in their outcome. The scoring system discriminated patients with diverging outcome in the validation cohort (5-year event-free survival, 84.9 ± 3.4 vs 63.6 ± 14.5 vs 31.0 ± 5.4; P < .001), and its prognostic value was validated by multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: We here propose a translational strategy for developing risk assessment systems based on hazard ratios of relevant prognostic variables. Our final neuroblastoma risk score comprised two multigene predictors only, supporting the notion that molecular properties of the tumor cells strongly impact clinical courses of neuroblastoma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56787362017-11-20 Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment Rosswog, Carolina Schmidt, Rene Oberthuer, André Juraeva, Dilafruz Brors, Benedikt Engesser, Anne Kahlert, Yvonne Volland, Ruth Bartenhagen, Christoph Simon, Thorsten Berthold, Frank Hero, Barbara Faldum, Andreas Fischer, Matthias Neoplasia Original article BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification systems for neuroblastoma patients consider clinical, histopathological, and genetic variables, and additional prognostic markers have been proposed in recent years. We here sought to select highly informative covariates in a multistep strategy based on consecutive Cox regression models, resulting in a risk score that integrates hazard ratios of prognostic variables. METHODS: A cohort of 695 neuroblastoma patients was divided into a discovery set (n = 75) for multigene predictor generation, a training set (n = 411) for risk score development, and a validation set (n = 209). Relevant prognostic variables were identified by stepwise multivariable L1-penalized least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression, followed by backward selection in multivariable Cox regression, and then integrated into a novel risk score. RESULTS: The variables stage, age, MYCN status, and two multigene predictors, NB-th24 and NB-th44, were selected as independent prognostic markers by LASSO Cox regression analysis. Following backward selection, only the multigene predictors were retained in the final model. Integration of these classifiers in a risk scoring system distinguished three patient subgroups that differed substantially in their outcome. The scoring system discriminated patients with diverging outcome in the validation cohort (5-year event-free survival, 84.9 ± 3.4 vs 63.6 ± 14.5 vs 31.0 ± 5.4; P < .001), and its prognostic value was validated by multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: We here propose a translational strategy for developing risk assessment systems based on hazard ratios of relevant prognostic variables. Our final neuroblastoma risk score comprised two multigene predictors only, supporting the notion that molecular properties of the tumor cells strongly impact clinical courses of neuroblastoma patients. Neoplasia Press 2017-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5678736/ /pubmed/29091799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.09.006 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Rosswog, Carolina
Schmidt, Rene
Oberthuer, André
Juraeva, Dilafruz
Brors, Benedikt
Engesser, Anne
Kahlert, Yvonne
Volland, Ruth
Bartenhagen, Christoph
Simon, Thorsten
Berthold, Frank
Hero, Barbara
Faldum, Andreas
Fischer, Matthias
Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment
title Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment
title_full Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment
title_fullStr Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment
title_short Molecular Classification Substitutes for the Prognostic Variables Stage, Age, and MYCN Status in Neuroblastoma Risk Assessment
title_sort molecular classification substitutes for the prognostic variables stage, age, and mycn status in neuroblastoma risk assessment
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29091799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.09.006
work_keys_str_mv AT rosswogcarolina molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT schmidtrene molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT oberthuerandre molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT juraevadilafruz molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT brorsbenedikt molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT engesseranne molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT kahlertyvonne molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT vollandruth molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT bartenhagenchristoph molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT simonthorsten molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT bertholdfrank molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT herobarbara molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT faldumandreas molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment
AT fischermatthias molecularclassificationsubstitutesfortheprognosticvariablesstageageandmycnstatusinneuroblastomariskassessment