Cargando…

The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing

BACKGROUND: Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: The study comprised two stages...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanehara, Akiko, Kotake, Risa, Miyamoto, Yuki, Kumakura, Yousuke, Morita, Kentaro, Ishiura, Tomoko, Shimizu, Kimiko, Fujieda, Yumiko, Ando, Shuntaro, Kondo, Shinsuke, Kasai, Kiyoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29115928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y
_version_ 1783277500500017152
author Kanehara, Akiko
Kotake, Risa
Miyamoto, Yuki
Kumakura, Yousuke
Morita, Kentaro
Ishiura, Tomoko
Shimizu, Kimiko
Fujieda, Yumiko
Ando, Shuntaro
Kondo, Shinsuke
Kasai, Kiyoto
author_facet Kanehara, Akiko
Kotake, Risa
Miyamoto, Yuki
Kumakura, Yousuke
Morita, Kentaro
Ishiura, Tomoko
Shimizu, Kimiko
Fujieda, Yumiko
Ando, Shuntaro
Kondo, Shinsuke
Kasai, Kiyoto
author_sort Kanehara, Akiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: The study comprised two stages that employed the cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs, respectively. We translated the questionnaire using a standard translation/back-translation method. Convergent validity was examined by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficients with scores on the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Short-Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine factorial validity. We used intraclass correlation and Cronbach’s alpha to examine the test-retest and internal consistency reliability of the QPR-J’s 22-item full scale, 17-item intrapersonal and 5-item interpersonal subscales. We conducted an EFA along with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 197 users of mental health services (mean age: 42.0 years; 61.9% female; 49.2% diagnosed with schizophrenia). The QPR-J showed adequate convergent validity, exhibiting significant, positive correlations with the RAS and SF-8 scores. The QPR-J’s full version, subscales, showed excellent test-retest and internal consistency reliability, with the exception of acceptable but relatively low internal consistency reliability for the interpersonal subscale. Based on the results of the CFA and EFA, we adopted the factor structure extracted from the original 2-factor model based on the present CFA. CONCLUSION: The QPR-J is an adequately valid and reliable measure of the process of recovery among Japanese users with mental health services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56787452017-11-17 The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing Kanehara, Akiko Kotake, Risa Miyamoto, Yuki Kumakura, Yousuke Morita, Kentaro Ishiura, Tomoko Shimizu, Kimiko Fujieda, Yumiko Ando, Shuntaro Kondo, Shinsuke Kasai, Kiyoto BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: The study comprised two stages that employed the cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs, respectively. We translated the questionnaire using a standard translation/back-translation method. Convergent validity was examined by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficients with scores on the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Short-Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine factorial validity. We used intraclass correlation and Cronbach’s alpha to examine the test-retest and internal consistency reliability of the QPR-J’s 22-item full scale, 17-item intrapersonal and 5-item interpersonal subscales. We conducted an EFA along with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 197 users of mental health services (mean age: 42.0 years; 61.9% female; 49.2% diagnosed with schizophrenia). The QPR-J showed adequate convergent validity, exhibiting significant, positive correlations with the RAS and SF-8 scores. The QPR-J’s full version, subscales, showed excellent test-retest and internal consistency reliability, with the exception of acceptable but relatively low internal consistency reliability for the interpersonal subscale. Based on the results of the CFA and EFA, we adopted the factor structure extracted from the original 2-factor model based on the present CFA. CONCLUSION: The QPR-J is an adequately valid and reliable measure of the process of recovery among Japanese users with mental health services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5678745/ /pubmed/29115928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kanehara, Akiko
Kotake, Risa
Miyamoto, Yuki
Kumakura, Yousuke
Morita, Kentaro
Ishiura, Tomoko
Shimizu, Kimiko
Fujieda, Yumiko
Ando, Shuntaro
Kondo, Shinsuke
Kasai, Kiyoto
The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
title The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
title_full The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
title_fullStr The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
title_full_unstemmed The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
title_short The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
title_sort japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29115928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kaneharaakiko thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kotakerisa thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT miyamotoyuki thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kumakurayousuke thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT moritakentaro thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT ishiuratomoko thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT shimizukimiko thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT fujiedayumiko thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT andoshuntaro thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kondoshinsuke thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kasaikiyoto thejapaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kaneharaakiko japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kotakerisa japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT miyamotoyuki japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kumakurayousuke japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT moritakentaro japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT ishiuratomoko japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT shimizukimiko japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT fujiedayumiko japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT andoshuntaro japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kondoshinsuke japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting
AT kasaikiyoto japaneseversionofthequestionnaireabouttheprocessofrecoverydevelopmentandvalidityandreliabilitytesting