Cargando…

Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors

BACKGROUND: The ability to make objective measurements of physical activity in dogs has both clinical and research applications. Accelerometers offer a non-intrusive and convenient solution. Of the commercialy available sensors, measurements are commonly given in manufacturer bespoke units and calcu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westgarth, C., Ladha, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1228-8
_version_ 1783277514365337600
author Westgarth, C.
Ladha, C.
author_facet Westgarth, C.
Ladha, C.
author_sort Westgarth, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ability to make objective measurements of physical activity in dogs has both clinical and research applications. Accelerometers offer a non-intrusive and convenient solution. Of the commercialy available sensors, measurements are commonly given in manufacturer bespoke units and calculated with closed source approaches. Furthermore, the validation studies that exist for such devices are mounting location dependant, not transferable between brands or not suitable for handling modern raw accelerometry type data. METHODS: This paper describes a validation study of n = 5 where 4 sensors were placed on each dog; 2 on a harness and 2 on a collar. Each position held two sensors from different manufacturers; Actigraph (which has previously been validated for use on the collar) and VetSens (which provides un-filtered accelerometry data). The aims of the study was to firstly evaluate the performance of an open-design method of converting raw accelerometry data into units that have previously been validated. Secondly, comparison was made between sensors mounted at each location for determining physical activity state. RESULTS: Once the raw actigraphy data had been processed with the open-design method, results from a 7 day measurement revealed no significant difference in physical activity estimates via a cutpoint approach between the sensor manufacturers. A second finding was a low inter-site variability between the ventral collar and dorsal harness locations (Pearsons r(2) = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Using the open-design methodology, raw, un-filtered data from the VetSens sensors can be compared or pooled with data gathered from Actigraph sensors. The results also provide strong evidence that ventral collar and dorsal harness sites may be used interchangeably. This enables studies to be designed with a larger inclusion criteria (encompassing dogs that are not well suited for wearing an instrumented collar) and ensures high levels of welfare while maintaining measurement validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5678807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56788072017-11-17 Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors Westgarth, C. Ladha, C. BMC Vet Res Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The ability to make objective measurements of physical activity in dogs has both clinical and research applications. Accelerometers offer a non-intrusive and convenient solution. Of the commercialy available sensors, measurements are commonly given in manufacturer bespoke units and calculated with closed source approaches. Furthermore, the validation studies that exist for such devices are mounting location dependant, not transferable between brands or not suitable for handling modern raw accelerometry type data. METHODS: This paper describes a validation study of n = 5 where 4 sensors were placed on each dog; 2 on a harness and 2 on a collar. Each position held two sensors from different manufacturers; Actigraph (which has previously been validated for use on the collar) and VetSens (which provides un-filtered accelerometry data). The aims of the study was to firstly evaluate the performance of an open-design method of converting raw accelerometry data into units that have previously been validated. Secondly, comparison was made between sensors mounted at each location for determining physical activity state. RESULTS: Once the raw actigraphy data had been processed with the open-design method, results from a 7 day measurement revealed no significant difference in physical activity estimates via a cutpoint approach between the sensor manufacturers. A second finding was a low inter-site variability between the ventral collar and dorsal harness locations (Pearsons r(2) = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Using the open-design methodology, raw, un-filtered data from the VetSens sensors can be compared or pooled with data gathered from Actigraph sensors. The results also provide strong evidence that ventral collar and dorsal harness sites may be used interchangeably. This enables studies to be designed with a larger inclusion criteria (encompassing dogs that are not well suited for wearing an instrumented collar) and ensures high levels of welfare while maintaining measurement validity. BioMed Central 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5678807/ /pubmed/29116008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1228-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Westgarth, C.
Ladha, C.
Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors
title Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors
title_full Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors
title_fullStr Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors
title_short Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors
title_sort evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5678807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1228-8
work_keys_str_mv AT westgarthc evaluationofanopensourcemethodforcalculatingphysicalactivityindogsfromharnessandcollarbasedsensors
AT ladhac evaluationofanopensourcemethodforcalculatingphysicalactivityindogsfromharnessandcollarbasedsensors