Cargando…

Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy

BACKGROUND: The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) progesteron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaman, Amal Yaseen, Coskun, Serdar, Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah, Awartani, Khalid Arab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y
_version_ 1783277551067594752
author Zaman, Amal Yaseen
Coskun, Serdar
Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah
Awartani, Khalid Arab
author_facet Zaman, Amal Yaseen
Coskun, Serdar
Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah
Awartani, Khalid Arab
author_sort Zaman, Amal Yaseen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) progesterone (P) supplementation for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). METHODS: It is a prospective cohort study done in a reproductive and infertility unit in a tertiary care hospital from March 2013 through February 2015 for four hundred and nine patients undergoing IVF-ET. Patients were allowed to choose either vaginal or IM P for LPS. Patient preference and satisfaction, as well as differences in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups were assessed at one or two time points throughout the study. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the patients’ characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups. There were 88 pregnancies (38.8%) among patients treated with vaginal p and 62 pregnancies (34%) among IM P patients. Average satisfaction score at the pregnancy test and ultrasound (U/S) visits was similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ satisfaction and pregnancy rates were similar between vaginal and IM P supplementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5679140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56791402017-11-17 Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy Zaman, Amal Yaseen Coskun, Serdar Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah Awartani, Khalid Arab Fertil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) progesterone (P) supplementation for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). METHODS: It is a prospective cohort study done in a reproductive and infertility unit in a tertiary care hospital from March 2013 through February 2015 for four hundred and nine patients undergoing IVF-ET. Patients were allowed to choose either vaginal or IM P for LPS. Patient preference and satisfaction, as well as differences in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups were assessed at one or two time points throughout the study. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the patients’ characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups. There were 88 pregnancies (38.8%) among patients treated with vaginal p and 62 pregnancies (34%) among IM P patients. Average satisfaction score at the pregnancy test and ultrasound (U/S) visits was similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ satisfaction and pregnancy rates were similar between vaginal and IM P supplementation. BioMed Central 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5679140/ /pubmed/29152320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zaman, Amal Yaseen
Coskun, Serdar
Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah
Awartani, Khalid Arab
Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
title Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
title_full Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
title_fullStr Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
title_short Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
title_sort intramuscular progesterone (gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zamanamalyaseen intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy
AT coskunserdar intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy
AT alsanieahmedabdullah intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy
AT awartanikhalidarab intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy