Cargando…
Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy
BACKGROUND: The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) progesteron...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y |
_version_ | 1783277551067594752 |
---|---|
author | Zaman, Amal Yaseen Coskun, Serdar Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah Awartani, Khalid Arab |
author_facet | Zaman, Amal Yaseen Coskun, Serdar Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah Awartani, Khalid Arab |
author_sort | Zaman, Amal Yaseen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) progesterone (P) supplementation for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). METHODS: It is a prospective cohort study done in a reproductive and infertility unit in a tertiary care hospital from March 2013 through February 2015 for four hundred and nine patients undergoing IVF-ET. Patients were allowed to choose either vaginal or IM P for LPS. Patient preference and satisfaction, as well as differences in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups were assessed at one or two time points throughout the study. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the patients’ characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups. There were 88 pregnancies (38.8%) among patients treated with vaginal p and 62 pregnancies (34%) among IM P patients. Average satisfaction score at the pregnancy test and ultrasound (U/S) visits was similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ satisfaction and pregnancy rates were similar between vaginal and IM P supplementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5679140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56791402017-11-17 Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy Zaman, Amal Yaseen Coskun, Serdar Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah Awartani, Khalid Arab Fertil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The requirement for luteal phase support (LPS) in stimulated IVF cycles is well established, however drug choice, and route of administration and duration of use are not. This report evaluates patients’ preference and satisfaction by using either vaginal or intramuscular (IM) progesterone (P) supplementation for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). METHODS: It is a prospective cohort study done in a reproductive and infertility unit in a tertiary care hospital from March 2013 through February 2015 for four hundred and nine patients undergoing IVF-ET. Patients were allowed to choose either vaginal or IM P for LPS. Patient preference and satisfaction, as well as differences in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups were assessed at one or two time points throughout the study. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the patients’ characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups. There were 88 pregnancies (38.8%) among patients treated with vaginal p and 62 pregnancies (34%) among IM P patients. Average satisfaction score at the pregnancy test and ultrasound (U/S) visits was similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients’ satisfaction and pregnancy rates were similar between vaginal and IM P supplementation. BioMed Central 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5679140/ /pubmed/29152320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zaman, Amal Yaseen Coskun, Serdar Alsanie, Ahmed Abdullah Awartani, Khalid Arab Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy |
title | Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy |
title_full | Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy |
title_fullStr | Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy |
title_short | Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy |
title_sort | intramuscular progesterone (gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0044-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zamanamalyaseen intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy AT coskunserdar intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy AT alsanieahmedabdullah intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy AT awartanikhalidarab intramuscularprogesteronegestoneversusvaginalprogesteronesuppositorycyclogestforlutealphasesupportincyclesofinvitrofertilizationembryotransferpatientpreferenceanddrugefficacy |