Cargando…

Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound myocardial cavitation enabled treatment (MCET) is an image-guided method for tissue reduction. In this study, a strategy of fractionated (multiple) treatments was tested for efficacy. METHODS: Dahl SS rats were anesthetized and prepared for treatment with a focused ultrasound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Douglas L., Lu, Xiaofang, Dou, Chunyan, Zhu, Yiying I., Fabiilli, Mario L., Owens, Gabe E., Kripfgans, Oliver D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0107-x
_version_ 1783277584193159168
author Miller, Douglas L.
Lu, Xiaofang
Dou, Chunyan
Zhu, Yiying I.
Fabiilli, Mario L.
Owens, Gabe E.
Kripfgans, Oliver D.
author_facet Miller, Douglas L.
Lu, Xiaofang
Dou, Chunyan
Zhu, Yiying I.
Fabiilli, Mario L.
Owens, Gabe E.
Kripfgans, Oliver D.
author_sort Miller, Douglas L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound myocardial cavitation enabled treatment (MCET) is an image-guided method for tissue reduction. In this study, a strategy of fractionated (multiple) treatments was tested for efficacy. METHODS: Dahl SS rats were anesthetized and prepared for treatment with a focused ultrasound transducer in a warm water bath. Aiming at the anterior left ventricular wall was facilitated by imaging with a 10 MHz phased array (10S, GE Vivid 7, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). MCET was accomplished at 1.5 MHz by pulse bursts of 4 MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitude, which were intermittently triggered 1:8 from the ECG during infusion of a microbubble suspension for cavitation nucleation. Test groups were sham, a 200 s treatment, three 200 s treatments a week apart, and a 600 s treatment. Treatment outcome was observed by plasma troponin after 4 h, echocardiographic monitoring and histology at 6 wk. RESULTS: The impacts of the fractionated treatments summed to approximately the same as the long treatment; e. g. the troponin result was 10.5 ± 3.2 for 200 s, 22.7 ± 5.4 (p < 0.001) for the summed fractionated treatments and 29.9 ± 6.4 for 600 s (p = 0.06 relative to the summed fractionated). While wall thickness was not reduced for the fractionated treatment, tissue strain was reduced by 35% in the target area relative sham (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ability to fractionate treatment may be advantageous for optimizing patient outcome relative to all-or nothing therapy by surgical myectomy or alcohol ablation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5679495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56794952017-11-17 Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction Miller, Douglas L. Lu, Xiaofang Dou, Chunyan Zhu, Yiying I. Fabiilli, Mario L. Owens, Gabe E. Kripfgans, Oliver D. J Ther Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Ultrasound myocardial cavitation enabled treatment (MCET) is an image-guided method for tissue reduction. In this study, a strategy of fractionated (multiple) treatments was tested for efficacy. METHODS: Dahl SS rats were anesthetized and prepared for treatment with a focused ultrasound transducer in a warm water bath. Aiming at the anterior left ventricular wall was facilitated by imaging with a 10 MHz phased array (10S, GE Vivid 7, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). MCET was accomplished at 1.5 MHz by pulse bursts of 4 MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitude, which were intermittently triggered 1:8 from the ECG during infusion of a microbubble suspension for cavitation nucleation. Test groups were sham, a 200 s treatment, three 200 s treatments a week apart, and a 600 s treatment. Treatment outcome was observed by plasma troponin after 4 h, echocardiographic monitoring and histology at 6 wk. RESULTS: The impacts of the fractionated treatments summed to approximately the same as the long treatment; e. g. the troponin result was 10.5 ± 3.2 for 200 s, 22.7 ± 5.4 (p < 0.001) for the summed fractionated treatments and 29.9 ± 6.4 for 600 s (p = 0.06 relative to the summed fractionated). While wall thickness was not reduced for the fractionated treatment, tissue strain was reduced by 35% in the target area relative sham (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ability to fractionate treatment may be advantageous for optimizing patient outcome relative to all-or nothing therapy by surgical myectomy or alcohol ablation. BioMed Central 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5679495/ /pubmed/29152303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0107-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Miller, Douglas L.
Lu, Xiaofang
Dou, Chunyan
Zhu, Yiying I.
Fabiilli, Mario L.
Owens, Gabe E.
Kripfgans, Oliver D.
Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction
title Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction
title_full Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction
title_fullStr Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction
title_full_unstemmed Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction
title_short Multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction
title_sort multiple ultrasound cavitation-enabled treatments for myocardial reduction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0107-x
work_keys_str_mv AT millerdouglasl multipleultrasoundcavitationenabledtreatmentsformyocardialreduction
AT luxiaofang multipleultrasoundcavitationenabledtreatmentsformyocardialreduction
AT douchunyan multipleultrasoundcavitationenabledtreatmentsformyocardialreduction
AT zhuyiyingi multipleultrasoundcavitationenabledtreatmentsformyocardialreduction
AT fabiillimariol multipleultrasoundcavitationenabledtreatmentsformyocardialreduction
AT owensgabee multipleultrasoundcavitationenabledtreatmentsformyocardialreduction
AT kripfgansoliverd multipleultrasoundcavitationenabledtreatmentsformyocardialreduction