Cargando…

A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and manifests as two major histological subtypes: embryonal and alveolar. The five-year local failure rate for RMS at parameningeal sites (middle ear, mastoid region, nasal cavity, etc.) is around 17% despite multiple Intergro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Tiffany W, Sison, Julian, Lee, Becky, Olch, Arthur J, Chang, Andrew, Giebeler, Annelise, Wong, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152430
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1673
_version_ 1783277643675729920
author Chen, Tiffany W
Sison, Julian
Lee, Becky
Olch, Arthur J
Chang, Andrew
Giebeler, Annelise
Wong, Kenneth
author_facet Chen, Tiffany W
Sison, Julian
Lee, Becky
Olch, Arthur J
Chang, Andrew
Giebeler, Annelise
Wong, Kenneth
author_sort Chen, Tiffany W
collection PubMed
description Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and manifests as two major histological subtypes: embryonal and alveolar. The five-year local failure rate for RMS at parameningeal sites (middle ear, mastoid region, nasal cavity, etc.) is around 17% despite multiple Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRS) trials conducted to determine the optimal radiation treatment regimen. This case report explores the use of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for a 10-year-old child who presented with left eye irritation, facial pain, and headaches and was found to have an alveolar parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma. He received systemic therapy as well as radiation therapy to 5,640 cGy and 4,320 cGy over 24 fractions, prescribed for gross tumor extension and adjacent high-risk involved sites, respectively, via simultaneous integrated boost. Approximately two years following treatment, the patient has had no recurrence of his RMS with no distant metastases. In addition, his presenting symptom of left eye irritation has improved. His only side effect from radiation at this point is short stature, possibly due to growth hormone deficiency. The patient’s IMPT plan was compared with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 4π non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, and comparisons of isodose lines show decreased dose to the distal brain tissue with preserved target conformality by IMPT. IMPT also allowed for increased sparing of the patient's retina, lens, and lacrimal gland. All radiation plans achieved conformal dose coverage to the planning/scanning target volumes, while the IMPT plan is potentially better at sparing the patient from developing long-term optic apparatus side effects and neurocognitive defects. In this case, IMPT is comparable, if not favorable, when long-term side effects can be reduced while maintaining dose conformality and local control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5679771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56797712017-11-17 A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma Chen, Tiffany W Sison, Julian Lee, Becky Olch, Arthur J Chang, Andrew Giebeler, Annelise Wong, Kenneth Cureus Other Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and manifests as two major histological subtypes: embryonal and alveolar. The five-year local failure rate for RMS at parameningeal sites (middle ear, mastoid region, nasal cavity, etc.) is around 17% despite multiple Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRS) trials conducted to determine the optimal radiation treatment regimen. This case report explores the use of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for a 10-year-old child who presented with left eye irritation, facial pain, and headaches and was found to have an alveolar parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma. He received systemic therapy as well as radiation therapy to 5,640 cGy and 4,320 cGy over 24 fractions, prescribed for gross tumor extension and adjacent high-risk involved sites, respectively, via simultaneous integrated boost. Approximately two years following treatment, the patient has had no recurrence of his RMS with no distant metastases. In addition, his presenting symptom of left eye irritation has improved. His only side effect from radiation at this point is short stature, possibly due to growth hormone deficiency. The patient’s IMPT plan was compared with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 4π non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, and comparisons of isodose lines show decreased dose to the distal brain tissue with preserved target conformality by IMPT. IMPT also allowed for increased sparing of the patient's retina, lens, and lacrimal gland. All radiation plans achieved conformal dose coverage to the planning/scanning target volumes, while the IMPT plan is potentially better at sparing the patient from developing long-term optic apparatus side effects and neurocognitive defects. In this case, IMPT is comparable, if not favorable, when long-term side effects can be reduced while maintaining dose conformality and local control. Cureus 2017-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5679771/ /pubmed/29152430 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1673 Text en Copyright © 2017, Chen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Other
Chen, Tiffany W
Sison, Julian
Lee, Becky
Olch, Arthur J
Chang, Andrew
Giebeler, Annelise
Wong, Kenneth
A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma
title A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_full A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_fullStr A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_full_unstemmed A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_short A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_sort dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 4π non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy for a patient with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152430
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1673
work_keys_str_mv AT chentiffanyw adosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT sisonjulian adosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT leebecky adosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT olcharthurj adosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT changandrew adosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT giebelerannelise adosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT wongkenneth adosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT chentiffanyw dosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT sisonjulian dosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT leebecky dosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT olcharthurj dosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT changandrew dosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT giebelerannelise dosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma
AT wongkenneth dosimetriccomparisonofintensitymodulatedprotontherapyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyand4pnoncoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforapatientwithparameningealrhabdomyosarcoma