Cargando…

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers

The purpose of the study was to compare the two mucin secretogogues, diquafosol (DQS) and rebamipide (RBM), for the treatment of dry eye syndrome (DES) in office workers. Dry eye patients using computers for >4 h/day were randomly assigned treatment with either DQS or RBM. Main outcomes measures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimazaki, Jun, Seika, Den, Saga, Masamichi, Fukagawa, Kazumi, Sakata, Miki, Iwasaki, Miki, Okano, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13121-9
_version_ 1783277727066882048
author Shimazaki, Jun
Seika, Den
Saga, Masamichi
Fukagawa, Kazumi
Sakata, Miki
Iwasaki, Miki
Okano, Takashi
author_facet Shimazaki, Jun
Seika, Den
Saga, Masamichi
Fukagawa, Kazumi
Sakata, Miki
Iwasaki, Miki
Okano, Takashi
author_sort Shimazaki, Jun
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to compare the two mucin secretogogues, diquafosol (DQS) and rebamipide (RBM), for the treatment of dry eye syndrome (DES) in office workers. Dry eye patients using computers for >4 h/day were randomly assigned treatment with either DQS or RBM. Main outcomes measures included changes in tear film break-up time (TBUT) and subjective symptoms assessed by the Dry Eye-Related Quality of Life Score (DEQS). The subjects had scheduled examinations at 0 and 4 weeks, and the examinations at 2 and 8 weeks were optional. Changes in keratoconjunctival fluorescein score and a patient satisfaction questionnaire were also recorded. Both groups showed significant improvements in the DEQS scores at 2, 4, and 8 weeks following the initiation of the study. Both groups showed significant increases in the TBUT at 2 and 4 weeks. No significant difference was found between the DQS and RBM groups at any time periods. Patients reported more comfort with the use of DQS compared with the use of RBM. No local or systemic side effects were noted. The results of the present study indicated that both DQS and RBM were effective for the treatment of DES in office workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5680274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56802742017-11-17 A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers Shimazaki, Jun Seika, Den Saga, Masamichi Fukagawa, Kazumi Sakata, Miki Iwasaki, Miki Okano, Takashi Sci Rep Article The purpose of the study was to compare the two mucin secretogogues, diquafosol (DQS) and rebamipide (RBM), for the treatment of dry eye syndrome (DES) in office workers. Dry eye patients using computers for >4 h/day were randomly assigned treatment with either DQS or RBM. Main outcomes measures included changes in tear film break-up time (TBUT) and subjective symptoms assessed by the Dry Eye-Related Quality of Life Score (DEQS). The subjects had scheduled examinations at 0 and 4 weeks, and the examinations at 2 and 8 weeks were optional. Changes in keratoconjunctival fluorescein score and a patient satisfaction questionnaire were also recorded. Both groups showed significant improvements in the DEQS scores at 2, 4, and 8 weeks following the initiation of the study. Both groups showed significant increases in the TBUT at 2 and 4 weeks. No significant difference was found between the DQS and RBM groups at any time periods. Patients reported more comfort with the use of DQS compared with the use of RBM. No local or systemic side effects were noted. The results of the present study indicated that both DQS and RBM were effective for the treatment of DES in office workers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5680274/ /pubmed/29123104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13121-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Shimazaki, Jun
Seika, Den
Saga, Masamichi
Fukagawa, Kazumi
Sakata, Miki
Iwasaki, Miki
Okano, Takashi
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers
title A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers
title_full A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers
title_fullStr A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers
title_short A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Two Mucin Secretogogues for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome in Office Workers
title_sort prospective, randomized trial of two mucin secretogogues for the treatment of dry eye syndrome in office workers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13121-9
work_keys_str_mv AT shimazakijun aprospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT seikaden aprospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT sagamasamichi aprospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT fukagawakazumi aprospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT sakatamiki aprospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT iwasakimiki aprospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT okanotakashi aprospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT shimazakijun prospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT seikaden prospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT sagamasamichi prospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT fukagawakazumi prospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT sakatamiki prospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT iwasakimiki prospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers
AT okanotakashi prospectiverandomizedtrialoftwomucinsecretogoguesforthetreatmentofdryeyesyndromeinofficeworkers