Cargando…

Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors

BACKGROUND: Intracranial epidermoid tumors are commonly found in the cerebellopontine angle where they usually present with either trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm. Radiosurgery for these tumors has rarely been reported. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Shehaby, Amr M. N., Reda, Wael A., Abdel Karim, Khaled M., Emad Eldin, Reem M., Nabeel, Ahmed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184709
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_206_17
_version_ 1783277808072523776
author El-Shehaby, Amr M. N.
Reda, Wael A.
Abdel Karim, Khaled M.
Emad Eldin, Reem M.
Nabeel, Ahmed M.
author_facet El-Shehaby, Amr M. N.
Reda, Wael A.
Abdel Karim, Khaled M.
Emad Eldin, Reem M.
Nabeel, Ahmed M.
author_sort El-Shehaby, Amr M. N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intracranial epidermoid tumors are commonly found in the cerebellopontine angle where they usually present with either trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm. Radiosurgery for these tumors has rarely been reported. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical outcome of the treatment of cerebellopontine epidermoid tumors with gamma knife radiosurgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective study involving 12 patients harboring cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors who underwent 15 sessions of gamma knife radiosurgery. Trigeminal pain was present in 8 patients and hemifacial spasm in 3 patients. All cases with trigeminal pain were receiving medication and still uncontrolled. One patient with hemifacial spasm was medically controlled before gamma knife and the other two were not. Two patients had undergone surgical resection prior to gamma knife treatment. The median prescription dose was 11 Gy (10–11 Gy). The tumor volumes ranged from 3.7 to 23.9 cc (median 10.5 cc). RESULTS: The median radiological follow up was 2 years (1–5 years). All tumors were controlled and one tumor shrank. The median clinical follow-up was 5 years. The trigeminal pain improved or disappeared in 5 patients, and of these, 4 cases stopped their medication and one decreased it. The hemifacial spasm resolved in 2 patients who were able to stop their medication. Facial palsy developed in 1 patient and improved with conservative treatment. Transient diplopia was also reported in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: Gamma knife radiosurgery provides good clinical control for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5680664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56806642017-11-28 Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors El-Shehaby, Amr M. N. Reda, Wael A. Abdel Karim, Khaled M. Emad Eldin, Reem M. Nabeel, Ahmed M. Surg Neurol Int Stereotactic: Original Article BACKGROUND: Intracranial epidermoid tumors are commonly found in the cerebellopontine angle where they usually present with either trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm. Radiosurgery for these tumors has rarely been reported. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical outcome of the treatment of cerebellopontine epidermoid tumors with gamma knife radiosurgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective study involving 12 patients harboring cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors who underwent 15 sessions of gamma knife radiosurgery. Trigeminal pain was present in 8 patients and hemifacial spasm in 3 patients. All cases with trigeminal pain were receiving medication and still uncontrolled. One patient with hemifacial spasm was medically controlled before gamma knife and the other two were not. Two patients had undergone surgical resection prior to gamma knife treatment. The median prescription dose was 11 Gy (10–11 Gy). The tumor volumes ranged from 3.7 to 23.9 cc (median 10.5 cc). RESULTS: The median radiological follow up was 2 years (1–5 years). All tumors were controlled and one tumor shrank. The median clinical follow-up was 5 years. The trigeminal pain improved or disappeared in 5 patients, and of these, 4 cases stopped their medication and one decreased it. The hemifacial spasm resolved in 2 patients who were able to stop their medication. Facial palsy developed in 1 patient and improved with conservative treatment. Transient diplopia was also reported in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: Gamma knife radiosurgery provides good clinical control for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5680664/ /pubmed/29184709 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_206_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Stereotactic: Original Article
El-Shehaby, Amr M. N.
Reda, Wael A.
Abdel Karim, Khaled M.
Emad Eldin, Reem M.
Nabeel, Ahmed M.
Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors
title Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors
title_full Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors
title_fullStr Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors
title_full_unstemmed Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors
title_short Gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors
title_sort gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumors
topic Stereotactic: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184709
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_206_17
work_keys_str_mv AT elshehabyamrmn gammakniferadiosurgeryforcerebellopontineangleepidermoidtumors
AT redawaela gammakniferadiosurgeryforcerebellopontineangleepidermoidtumors
AT abdelkarimkhaledm gammakniferadiosurgeryforcerebellopontineangleepidermoidtumors
AT emadeldinreemm gammakniferadiosurgeryforcerebellopontineangleepidermoidtumors
AT nabeelahmedm gammakniferadiosurgeryforcerebellopontineangleepidermoidtumors