Cargando…

Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR

BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision-making for health is far from the norm, particularly in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has an important role in providing the context-sensitive and -relevant evidence that is needed. However, there remai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shroff, Zubin Cyrus, Javadi, Dena, Gilson, Lucy, Kang, Rockie, Ghaffar, Abdul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29121958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0261-1
_version_ 1783277833928310784
author Shroff, Zubin Cyrus
Javadi, Dena
Gilson, Lucy
Kang, Rockie
Ghaffar, Abdul
author_facet Shroff, Zubin Cyrus
Javadi, Dena
Gilson, Lucy
Kang, Rockie
Ghaffar, Abdul
author_sort Shroff, Zubin Cyrus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision-making for health is far from the norm, particularly in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has an important role in providing the context-sensitive and -relevant evidence that is needed. However, there remain significant challenges both on the supply side, in terms of capacity for generation of policy-relevant knowledge such as HPSR, and on the demand side in terms of the demand for and use of evidence for policy decisions. This paper brings together elements from both sides to analyse institutional capacity for the generation of HPSR and the use of evidence (including HPSR) more broadly in LMICs. METHODS: The paper uses literature review methods and two survey instruments (directed at research institutions and Ministries of Health, respectively) to explore the types of institutional support required to enhance the generation and use of evidence. RESULTS: Findings from the survey of research institutions identified the absence of core funding, the lack of definitional clarity and academic incentive structures for HPSR as significant constraints. On the other hand, the survey of Ministries of Health identified a lack of locally relevant evidence, poor presentation of research findings and low institutional prioritisation of evidence use as significant constraints to evidence uptake. In contrast, improved communication between researchers and decision-makers and increased availability of relevant evidence were identified as facilitators of evidence uptake. CONCLUSION: The findings make a case for institutional arrangements in research that provide support for career development, collaboration and cross-learning for researchers, as well as the setting up of institutional arrangements and processes to incentivise the use of evidence among Ministries of Health and other decision-making institutions. The paper ends with a series of recommendations to build institutional capacity in HPSR through engaging multiple stakeholders in identifying and maintaining incentive structures, improving research (including HPSR) training, and developing stronger tools for synthesising non-traditional forms of local, policy-relevant evidence such as grey literature. Addressing challenges on both the supply and demand side can build institutional capacity in the research and policy worlds and support the enhanced uptake of high quality evidence in policy decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5680819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56808192017-11-17 Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR Shroff, Zubin Cyrus Javadi, Dena Gilson, Lucy Kang, Rockie Ghaffar, Abdul Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision-making for health is far from the norm, particularly in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has an important role in providing the context-sensitive and -relevant evidence that is needed. However, there remain significant challenges both on the supply side, in terms of capacity for generation of policy-relevant knowledge such as HPSR, and on the demand side in terms of the demand for and use of evidence for policy decisions. This paper brings together elements from both sides to analyse institutional capacity for the generation of HPSR and the use of evidence (including HPSR) more broadly in LMICs. METHODS: The paper uses literature review methods and two survey instruments (directed at research institutions and Ministries of Health, respectively) to explore the types of institutional support required to enhance the generation and use of evidence. RESULTS: Findings from the survey of research institutions identified the absence of core funding, the lack of definitional clarity and academic incentive structures for HPSR as significant constraints. On the other hand, the survey of Ministries of Health identified a lack of locally relevant evidence, poor presentation of research findings and low institutional prioritisation of evidence use as significant constraints to evidence uptake. In contrast, improved communication between researchers and decision-makers and increased availability of relevant evidence were identified as facilitators of evidence uptake. CONCLUSION: The findings make a case for institutional arrangements in research that provide support for career development, collaboration and cross-learning for researchers, as well as the setting up of institutional arrangements and processes to incentivise the use of evidence among Ministries of Health and other decision-making institutions. The paper ends with a series of recommendations to build institutional capacity in HPSR through engaging multiple stakeholders in identifying and maintaining incentive structures, improving research (including HPSR) training, and developing stronger tools for synthesising non-traditional forms of local, policy-relevant evidence such as grey literature. Addressing challenges on both the supply and demand side can build institutional capacity in the research and policy worlds and support the enhanced uptake of high quality evidence in policy decisions. BioMed Central 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5680819/ /pubmed/29121958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0261-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Shroff, Zubin Cyrus
Javadi, Dena
Gilson, Lucy
Kang, Rockie
Ghaffar, Abdul
Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR
title Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR
title_full Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR
title_fullStr Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR
title_full_unstemmed Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR
title_short Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR
title_sort institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in lmics: current state and opportunities for hpsr
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29121958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0261-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shroffzubincyrus institutionalcapacitytogenerateanduseevidenceinlmicscurrentstateandopportunitiesforhpsr
AT javadidena institutionalcapacitytogenerateanduseevidenceinlmicscurrentstateandopportunitiesforhpsr
AT gilsonlucy institutionalcapacitytogenerateanduseevidenceinlmicscurrentstateandopportunitiesforhpsr
AT kangrockie institutionalcapacitytogenerateanduseevidenceinlmicscurrentstateandopportunitiesforhpsr
AT ghaffarabdul institutionalcapacitytogenerateanduseevidenceinlmicscurrentstateandopportunitiesforhpsr