Cargando…
High quality of evidence is uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
BACKGROUND: The association between the quality of evidence in systematic reviews and authors’ conclusions regarding the effectiveness of interventions relevant to anaesthesia has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were: to determine the proportion of systematic reviews in wh...
Autores principales: | Conway, Aaron, Conway, Zachary, Soalheira, Kathleen, Sutherland, Joanna |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009-
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29095726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000691 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Depth of anaesthesia monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review protocol
por: Conway, Aaron, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Influence of a vertical subject on research in biomedicine and activities of The Cochrane Collaboration branch on medical students' knowledge and attitudes toward evidence-based medicine
por: Balajić, Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Feedback in the Emergency Medicine Clerkship
por: Bernard, Aaron W, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews
por: Imberger, Georgina, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Cochrane systematic reviews on traditional Chinese medicine: What matters–the quantity or quality of evidence?
por: Dai, Zeqi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)