Cargando…

Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease

BACKGROUND: Patient and public preferences for therapeutic outcomes or medical technologies are often elicited, and discordance between the two is frequently reported. OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to compare patient and public preferences for treatment attributes in Parkinson’s disease (PD). ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weernink, Marieke G. M., van Til, Janine A., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M., IJzerman, Maarten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28508354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0247-7
_version_ 1783277941863481344
author Weernink, Marieke G. M.
van Til, Janine A.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
IJzerman, Maarten J.
author_facet Weernink, Marieke G. M.
van Til, Janine A.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
IJzerman, Maarten J.
author_sort Weernink, Marieke G. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and public preferences for therapeutic outcomes or medical technologies are often elicited, and discordance between the two is frequently reported. OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to compare patient and public preferences for treatment attributes in Parkinson’s disease (PD). METHODS: A representative sample from Dutch PD patients and the general public were invited to complete a best–worst scaling case 2 experiment consisting of six health-related outcomes and one attribute describing the specific treatment (brain surgery, pump, oral medication). Data were analyzed using mixed logit models, and attribute impact was estimated and compared between populations (and population subgroups). RESULTS: Both the public (N = 276) and patient (N = 198) populations considered treatment modality the most important attribute, although patients assigned higher relative importance. Both groups assigned high disutility to pump infusion and brain surgery and preferred drug treatment. Most health outcomes were valued equally by patients and the public, with the exception of reducing dizziness (more important to the public) and improving slow movement (more important to patients). DISCUSSION: Although these data do not support definite conclusions on whether patients are less likely to undergo invasive treatments, the (predicted) choice probability of undergoing brain surgery or having pump infusion technology would be low based on the (un)desirability of the attribute levels. Patients with PD might have adapted to their condition and are not willing to undergo advanced treatments in order to receive health improvements. Both public and patient preferences entail information that is potentially relevant for decision makers, and patient preferences can inform decision makers about the likelihood of adaptation to a specific condition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0247-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5681616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56816162017-11-21 Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease Weernink, Marieke G. M. van Til, Janine A. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M. IJzerman, Maarten J. Patient Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient and public preferences for therapeutic outcomes or medical technologies are often elicited, and discordance between the two is frequently reported. OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to compare patient and public preferences for treatment attributes in Parkinson’s disease (PD). METHODS: A representative sample from Dutch PD patients and the general public were invited to complete a best–worst scaling case 2 experiment consisting of six health-related outcomes and one attribute describing the specific treatment (brain surgery, pump, oral medication). Data were analyzed using mixed logit models, and attribute impact was estimated and compared between populations (and population subgroups). RESULTS: Both the public (N = 276) and patient (N = 198) populations considered treatment modality the most important attribute, although patients assigned higher relative importance. Both groups assigned high disutility to pump infusion and brain surgery and preferred drug treatment. Most health outcomes were valued equally by patients and the public, with the exception of reducing dizziness (more important to the public) and improving slow movement (more important to patients). DISCUSSION: Although these data do not support definite conclusions on whether patients are less likely to undergo invasive treatments, the (predicted) choice probability of undergoing brain surgery or having pump infusion technology would be low based on the (un)desirability of the attribute levels. Patients with PD might have adapted to their condition and are not willing to undergo advanced treatments in order to receive health improvements. Both public and patient preferences entail information that is potentially relevant for decision makers, and patient preferences can inform decision makers about the likelihood of adaptation to a specific condition. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0247-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-05-15 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5681616/ /pubmed/28508354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0247-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Weernink, Marieke G. M.
van Til, Janine A.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease
title Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_full Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_fullStr Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_short Patient and Public Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Parkinson’s Disease
title_sort patient and public preferences for treatment attributes in parkinson’s disease
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28508354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0247-7
work_keys_str_mv AT weerninkmariekegm patientandpublicpreferencesfortreatmentattributesinparkinsonsdisease
AT vantiljaninea patientandpublicpreferencesfortreatmentattributesinparkinsonsdisease
AT groothuisoudshoorncatharinagm patientandpublicpreferencesfortreatmentattributesinparkinsonsdisease
AT ijzermanmaartenj patientandpublicpreferencesfortreatmentattributesinparkinsonsdisease