Cargando…

Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent

Territorial animals carry out extra-territorial movements (forays) to obtain pre-dispersal information or to increase reproductive success via extra-pair copulation. However, little is known about other purposes and spatial movement patterns of forays. In this study, we GPS-tagged 54 Eurasian beaver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayer, Martin, Zedrosser, Andreas, Rosell, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15540-0
_version_ 1783277957910888448
author Mayer, Martin
Zedrosser, Andreas
Rosell, Frank
author_facet Mayer, Martin
Zedrosser, Andreas
Rosell, Frank
author_sort Mayer, Martin
collection PubMed
description Territorial animals carry out extra-territorial movements (forays) to obtain pre-dispersal information or to increase reproductive success via extra-pair copulation. However, little is known about other purposes and spatial movement patterns of forays. In this study, we GPS-tagged 54 Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber), a year-round territorial, monogamous mammal, during the non-mating season. We investigated forays in territory-holding breeders (dominants) and non-breeding (subordinate) family members. Twenty of 46 dominant individuals (44%), and 6 of 10 subordinates (60%) conducted forays. Generally, beavers spent between 0 and 11% of their active time on forays, travelled faster and spend more time in water when on forays compared to intra-territorial movements, suggesting that forays are energetically costly. Further, beavers in smaller territories conducted more forays. Possibly, smaller territories might not have sufficient resources and thus dominant individuals might conduct forays to assess possibilities for territory expansion, and potentially for foraging. Generally, besides territory advertisement (e.g. via scent-marking), forays might serve as an additional mechanism for territory owners to assess neighbours. Subordinates spent more time on forays, moved greater distances and intruded into more territories than dominant individuals did, suggesting that they prospected to gain information on the population density and available mates before dispersal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5681683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56816832017-11-17 Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent Mayer, Martin Zedrosser, Andreas Rosell, Frank Sci Rep Article Territorial animals carry out extra-territorial movements (forays) to obtain pre-dispersal information or to increase reproductive success via extra-pair copulation. However, little is known about other purposes and spatial movement patterns of forays. In this study, we GPS-tagged 54 Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber), a year-round territorial, monogamous mammal, during the non-mating season. We investigated forays in territory-holding breeders (dominants) and non-breeding (subordinate) family members. Twenty of 46 dominant individuals (44%), and 6 of 10 subordinates (60%) conducted forays. Generally, beavers spent between 0 and 11% of their active time on forays, travelled faster and spend more time in water when on forays compared to intra-territorial movements, suggesting that forays are energetically costly. Further, beavers in smaller territories conducted more forays. Possibly, smaller territories might not have sufficient resources and thus dominant individuals might conduct forays to assess possibilities for territory expansion, and potentially for foraging. Generally, besides territory advertisement (e.g. via scent-marking), forays might serve as an additional mechanism for territory owners to assess neighbours. Subordinates spent more time on forays, moved greater distances and intruded into more territories than dominant individuals did, suggesting that they prospected to gain information on the population density and available mates before dispersal. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5681683/ /pubmed/29127395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15540-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mayer, Martin
Zedrosser, Andreas
Rosell, Frank
Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
title Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
title_full Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
title_fullStr Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
title_full_unstemmed Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
title_short Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
title_sort extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15540-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mayermartin extraterritorialmovementsdifferbetweenterritoryholdersandsubordinatesinalargemonogamousrodent
AT zedrosserandreas extraterritorialmovementsdifferbetweenterritoryholdersandsubordinatesinalargemonogamousrodent
AT rosellfrank extraterritorialmovementsdifferbetweenterritoryholdersandsubordinatesinalargemonogamousrodent