Cargando…
Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent
Territorial animals carry out extra-territorial movements (forays) to obtain pre-dispersal information or to increase reproductive success via extra-pair copulation. However, little is known about other purposes and spatial movement patterns of forays. In this study, we GPS-tagged 54 Eurasian beaver...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15540-0 |
_version_ | 1783277957910888448 |
---|---|
author | Mayer, Martin Zedrosser, Andreas Rosell, Frank |
author_facet | Mayer, Martin Zedrosser, Andreas Rosell, Frank |
author_sort | Mayer, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Territorial animals carry out extra-territorial movements (forays) to obtain pre-dispersal information or to increase reproductive success via extra-pair copulation. However, little is known about other purposes and spatial movement patterns of forays. In this study, we GPS-tagged 54 Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber), a year-round territorial, monogamous mammal, during the non-mating season. We investigated forays in territory-holding breeders (dominants) and non-breeding (subordinate) family members. Twenty of 46 dominant individuals (44%), and 6 of 10 subordinates (60%) conducted forays. Generally, beavers spent between 0 and 11% of their active time on forays, travelled faster and spend more time in water when on forays compared to intra-territorial movements, suggesting that forays are energetically costly. Further, beavers in smaller territories conducted more forays. Possibly, smaller territories might not have sufficient resources and thus dominant individuals might conduct forays to assess possibilities for territory expansion, and potentially for foraging. Generally, besides territory advertisement (e.g. via scent-marking), forays might serve as an additional mechanism for territory owners to assess neighbours. Subordinates spent more time on forays, moved greater distances and intruded into more territories than dominant individuals did, suggesting that they prospected to gain information on the population density and available mates before dispersal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5681683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56816832017-11-17 Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent Mayer, Martin Zedrosser, Andreas Rosell, Frank Sci Rep Article Territorial animals carry out extra-territorial movements (forays) to obtain pre-dispersal information or to increase reproductive success via extra-pair copulation. However, little is known about other purposes and spatial movement patterns of forays. In this study, we GPS-tagged 54 Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber), a year-round territorial, monogamous mammal, during the non-mating season. We investigated forays in territory-holding breeders (dominants) and non-breeding (subordinate) family members. Twenty of 46 dominant individuals (44%), and 6 of 10 subordinates (60%) conducted forays. Generally, beavers spent between 0 and 11% of their active time on forays, travelled faster and spend more time in water when on forays compared to intra-territorial movements, suggesting that forays are energetically costly. Further, beavers in smaller territories conducted more forays. Possibly, smaller territories might not have sufficient resources and thus dominant individuals might conduct forays to assess possibilities for territory expansion, and potentially for foraging. Generally, besides territory advertisement (e.g. via scent-marking), forays might serve as an additional mechanism for territory owners to assess neighbours. Subordinates spent more time on forays, moved greater distances and intruded into more territories than dominant individuals did, suggesting that they prospected to gain information on the population density and available mates before dispersal. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5681683/ /pubmed/29127395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15540-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Mayer, Martin Zedrosser, Andreas Rosell, Frank Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent |
title | Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent |
title_full | Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent |
title_fullStr | Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent |
title_full_unstemmed | Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent |
title_short | Extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent |
title_sort | extra-territorial movements differ between territory holders and subordinates in a large, monogamous rodent |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15540-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayermartin extraterritorialmovementsdifferbetweenterritoryholdersandsubordinatesinalargemonogamousrodent AT zedrosserandreas extraterritorialmovementsdifferbetweenterritoryholdersandsubordinatesinalargemonogamousrodent AT rosellfrank extraterritorialmovementsdifferbetweenterritoryholdersandsubordinatesinalargemonogamousrodent |