Cargando…

Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”

Target 6.4 of the recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) deals with the reduction of water scarcity. To monitor progress towards this target, two indicators are used: Indicator 6.4.1 measuring water use efficiency and 6.4.2 measuring the level of water stress (WS). This paper aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanham, D., Hoekstra, A.Y., Wada, Y., Bouraoui, F., de Roo, A., Mekonnen, M.M., van de Bund, W.J., Batelaan, O., Pavelic, P., Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., Kummu, M., Rockström, J., Liu, J., Bisselink, B., Ronco, P., Pistocchi, A., Bidoglio, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28915458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056
_version_ 1783277962643111936
author Vanham, D.
Hoekstra, A.Y.
Wada, Y.
Bouraoui, F.
de Roo, A.
Mekonnen, M.M.
van de Bund, W.J.
Batelaan, O.
Pavelic, P.
Bastiaanssen, W.G.M.
Kummu, M.
Rockström, J.
Liu, J.
Bisselink, B.
Ronco, P.
Pistocchi, A.
Bidoglio, G.
author_facet Vanham, D.
Hoekstra, A.Y.
Wada, Y.
Bouraoui, F.
de Roo, A.
Mekonnen, M.M.
van de Bund, W.J.
Batelaan, O.
Pavelic, P.
Bastiaanssen, W.G.M.
Kummu, M.
Rockström, J.
Liu, J.
Bisselink, B.
Ronco, P.
Pistocchi, A.
Bidoglio, G.
author_sort Vanham, D.
collection PubMed
description Target 6.4 of the recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) deals with the reduction of water scarcity. To monitor progress towards this target, two indicators are used: Indicator 6.4.1 measuring water use efficiency and 6.4.2 measuring the level of water stress (WS). This paper aims to identify whether the currently proposed indicator 6.4.2 considers the different elements that need to be accounted for in a WS indicator. WS indicators compare water use with water availability. We identify seven essential elements: 1) both gross and net water abstraction (or withdrawal) provide important information to understand WS; 2) WS indicators need to incorporate environmental flow requirements (EFR); 3) temporal and 4) spatial disaggregation is required in a WS assessment; 5) both renewable surface water and groundwater resources, including their interaction, need to be accounted for as renewable water availability; 6) alternative available water resources need to be accounted for as well, like fossil groundwater and desalinated water; 7) WS indicators need to account for water storage in reservoirs, water recycling and managed aquifer recharge. Indicator 6.4.2 considers many of these elements, but there is need for improvement. It is recommended that WS is measured based on net abstraction as well, in addition to currently only measuring WS based on gross abstraction. It does incorporate EFR. Temporal and spatial disaggregation is indeed defined as a goal in more advanced monitoring levels, in which it is also called for a differentiation between surface and groundwater resources. However, regarding element 6 and 7 there are some shortcomings for which we provide recommendations. In addition, indicator 6.4.2 is only one indicator, which monitors blue WS, but does not give information on green or green-blue water scarcity or on water quality. Within the SDG indicator framework, some of these topics are covered with other indicators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5681707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56817072018-02-01 Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress” Vanham, D. Hoekstra, A.Y. Wada, Y. Bouraoui, F. de Roo, A. Mekonnen, M.M. van de Bund, W.J. Batelaan, O. Pavelic, P. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. Kummu, M. Rockström, J. Liu, J. Bisselink, B. Ronco, P. Pistocchi, A. Bidoglio, G. Sci Total Environ Article Target 6.4 of the recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) deals with the reduction of water scarcity. To monitor progress towards this target, two indicators are used: Indicator 6.4.1 measuring water use efficiency and 6.4.2 measuring the level of water stress (WS). This paper aims to identify whether the currently proposed indicator 6.4.2 considers the different elements that need to be accounted for in a WS indicator. WS indicators compare water use with water availability. We identify seven essential elements: 1) both gross and net water abstraction (or withdrawal) provide important information to understand WS; 2) WS indicators need to incorporate environmental flow requirements (EFR); 3) temporal and 4) spatial disaggregation is required in a WS assessment; 5) both renewable surface water and groundwater resources, including their interaction, need to be accounted for as renewable water availability; 6) alternative available water resources need to be accounted for as well, like fossil groundwater and desalinated water; 7) WS indicators need to account for water storage in reservoirs, water recycling and managed aquifer recharge. Indicator 6.4.2 considers many of these elements, but there is need for improvement. It is recommended that WS is measured based on net abstraction as well, in addition to currently only measuring WS based on gross abstraction. It does incorporate EFR. Temporal and spatial disaggregation is indeed defined as a goal in more advanced monitoring levels, in which it is also called for a differentiation between surface and groundwater resources. However, regarding element 6 and 7 there are some shortcomings for which we provide recommendations. In addition, indicator 6.4.2 is only one indicator, which monitors blue WS, but does not give information on green or green-blue water scarcity or on water quality. Within the SDG indicator framework, some of these topics are covered with other indicators. Elsevier 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5681707/ /pubmed/28915458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vanham, D.
Hoekstra, A.Y.
Wada, Y.
Bouraoui, F.
de Roo, A.
Mekonnen, M.M.
van de Bund, W.J.
Batelaan, O.
Pavelic, P.
Bastiaanssen, W.G.M.
Kummu, M.
Rockström, J.
Liu, J.
Bisselink, B.
Ronco, P.
Pistocchi, A.
Bidoglio, G.
Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”
title Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”
title_full Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”
title_fullStr Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”
title_full_unstemmed Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”
title_short Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”
title_sort physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards sdg target 6.4: an evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “level of water stress”
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28915458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhamd physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT hoekstraay physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT waday physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT bouraouif physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT derooa physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT mekonnenmm physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT vandebundwj physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT batelaano physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT pavelicp physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT bastiaanssenwgm physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT kummum physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT rockstromj physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT liuj physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT bisselinkb physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT roncop physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT pistocchia physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress
AT bidogliog physicalwaterscarcitymetricsformonitoringprogresstowardssdgtarget64anevaluationofindicator642levelofwaterstress