Cargando…
Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition
BACKGROUND: The recent paper in Trials by Porter and colleagues highlights the utility of applying a critical realism approach in randomised trials, an approach central to the Medical Research Council’s (MRC) Framework for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Healthcare Interventions. The MRC f...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29126449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2286-8 |
_version_ | 1783277979448639488 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Anders Blædel Gottlieb Jones, Allan |
author_facet | Hansen, Anders Blædel Gottlieb Jones, Allan |
author_sort | Hansen, Anders Blædel Gottlieb |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The recent paper in Trials by Porter and colleagues highlights the utility of applying a critical realism approach in randomised trials, an approach central to the Medical Research Council’s (MRC) Framework for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Healthcare Interventions. The MRC framework offers a pragmatic step towards a more open systems approach that bridges randomised evaluation with social context and human agency in an effort to improve the generalisability of trial outcomes. MAIN BODY: The MRC framework has contributed to the proliferation of a more open systems approach in health research; however, the broader acceptance of the realist approach to health research does not seem to be emulated by norms in research fund allocation, which largely prioritises laboratory-based research. CONCLUSION: This commentary is simply a plea, to those who make the strategic decisions regarding allocation of research funding, to support all phases of health intervention research in complex systems that contribute to the development of effective, translational and sustainable interventions in the promotion of health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5681782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56817822017-11-17 Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition Hansen, Anders Blædel Gottlieb Jones, Allan Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: The recent paper in Trials by Porter and colleagues highlights the utility of applying a critical realism approach in randomised trials, an approach central to the Medical Research Council’s (MRC) Framework for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Healthcare Interventions. The MRC framework offers a pragmatic step towards a more open systems approach that bridges randomised evaluation with social context and human agency in an effort to improve the generalisability of trial outcomes. MAIN BODY: The MRC framework has contributed to the proliferation of a more open systems approach in health research; however, the broader acceptance of the realist approach to health research does not seem to be emulated by norms in research fund allocation, which largely prioritises laboratory-based research. CONCLUSION: This commentary is simply a plea, to those who make the strategic decisions regarding allocation of research funding, to support all phases of health intervention research in complex systems that contribute to the development of effective, translational and sustainable interventions in the promotion of health. BioMed Central 2017-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5681782/ /pubmed/29126449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2286-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Hansen, Anders Blædel Gottlieb Jones, Allan Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition |
title | Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition |
title_full | Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition |
title_fullStr | Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition |
title_full_unstemmed | Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition |
title_short | Advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition |
title_sort | advancing ‘real-world’ trials that take account of social context and human volition |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29126449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2286-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenandersblædelgottlieb advancingrealworldtrialsthattakeaccountofsocialcontextandhumanvolition AT jonesallan advancingrealworldtrialsthattakeaccountofsocialcontextandhumanvolition |