Cargando…

Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments

PURPOSE: Opioid dependence is a chronic relapsing disorder. Despite increasing research on quality of life (QOL) in people with opioid dependence, little attention has been paid to the instruments used. This systematic review examines the suitability of QOL instruments for use in opioid-dependent po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strada, Lisa, Vanderplasschen, Wouter, Buchholz, Angela, Schulte, Bernd, Muller, Ashley E., Verthein, Uwe, Reimer, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28762100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1674-6
_version_ 1783278017044283392
author Strada, Lisa
Vanderplasschen, Wouter
Buchholz, Angela
Schulte, Bernd
Muller, Ashley E.
Verthein, Uwe
Reimer, Jens
author_facet Strada, Lisa
Vanderplasschen, Wouter
Buchholz, Angela
Schulte, Bernd
Muller, Ashley E.
Verthein, Uwe
Reimer, Jens
author_sort Strada, Lisa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Opioid dependence is a chronic relapsing disorder. Despite increasing research on quality of life (QOL) in people with opioid dependence, little attention has been paid to the instruments used. This systematic review examines the suitability of QOL instruments for use in opioid-dependent populations and the instruments’ quality. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in the databases Medline, PsycInfo, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Articles were eligible if they assessed QOL of opioid-dependent populations using a validated QOL instrument. Item content relevance to opioid-dependent people was evaluated by means of content analysis, and instrument properties were assessed using minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Eighty-nine articles were retrieved, yielding sixteen QOL instruments, of which ten were assessed in this review. Of the ten instruments, six were disease specific, but none for opioid dependence. Two instruments had good item content relevance. The conceptual and measurement model were described in seven instruments. Four instruments were developed with input from the respective target population. Eight instruments had low respondent and administrator burden. Psychometric properties were either not assessed in opioid-dependent populations or were inconclusive or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: No instrument scored perfectly on both the content and properties. The limited suitability of instruments for opioid-dependent people hinders accurate and sensitive measurement of QOL in this population. Future research is in need of an opioid dependence-specific QOL instrument to measure the true impact of the disease on people’s lives and to evaluate treatment-related services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1674-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5681984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56819842017-11-22 Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments Strada, Lisa Vanderplasschen, Wouter Buchholz, Angela Schulte, Bernd Muller, Ashley E. Verthein, Uwe Reimer, Jens Qual Life Res Review PURPOSE: Opioid dependence is a chronic relapsing disorder. Despite increasing research on quality of life (QOL) in people with opioid dependence, little attention has been paid to the instruments used. This systematic review examines the suitability of QOL instruments for use in opioid-dependent populations and the instruments’ quality. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in the databases Medline, PsycInfo, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Articles were eligible if they assessed QOL of opioid-dependent populations using a validated QOL instrument. Item content relevance to opioid-dependent people was evaluated by means of content analysis, and instrument properties were assessed using minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Eighty-nine articles were retrieved, yielding sixteen QOL instruments, of which ten were assessed in this review. Of the ten instruments, six were disease specific, but none for opioid dependence. Two instruments had good item content relevance. The conceptual and measurement model were described in seven instruments. Four instruments were developed with input from the respective target population. Eight instruments had low respondent and administrator burden. Psychometric properties were either not assessed in opioid-dependent populations or were inconclusive or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: No instrument scored perfectly on both the content and properties. The limited suitability of instruments for opioid-dependent people hinders accurate and sensitive measurement of QOL in this population. Future research is in need of an opioid dependence-specific QOL instrument to measure the true impact of the disease on people’s lives and to evaluate treatment-related services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1674-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-31 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5681984/ /pubmed/28762100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1674-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Strada, Lisa
Vanderplasschen, Wouter
Buchholz, Angela
Schulte, Bernd
Muller, Ashley E.
Verthein, Uwe
Reimer, Jens
Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
title Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
title_full Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
title_fullStr Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
title_full_unstemmed Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
title_short Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
title_sort measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5681984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28762100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1674-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stradalisa measuringqualityoflifeinopioiddependentpeopleasystematicreviewofassessmentinstruments
AT vanderplasschenwouter measuringqualityoflifeinopioiddependentpeopleasystematicreviewofassessmentinstruments
AT buchholzangela measuringqualityoflifeinopioiddependentpeopleasystematicreviewofassessmentinstruments
AT schultebernd measuringqualityoflifeinopioiddependentpeopleasystematicreviewofassessmentinstruments
AT mullerashleye measuringqualityoflifeinopioiddependentpeopleasystematicreviewofassessmentinstruments
AT vertheinuwe measuringqualityoflifeinopioiddependentpeopleasystematicreviewofassessmentinstruments
AT reimerjens measuringqualityoflifeinopioiddependentpeopleasystematicreviewofassessmentinstruments