Cargando…

Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up

We previously found that electrical stimulation in the anterior limb of the internal capsule/bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (IC/BST) alleviates depressive symptoms in severe treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Here we tested the hypothesis that electrical stimulati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raymaekers, S, Luyten, L, Bervoets, C, Gabriëls, L, Nuttin, B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29087373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.66
_version_ 1783278128021372928
author Raymaekers, S
Luyten, L
Bervoets, C
Gabriëls, L
Nuttin, B
author_facet Raymaekers, S
Luyten, L
Bervoets, C
Gabriëls, L
Nuttin, B
author_sort Raymaekers, S
collection PubMed
description We previously found that electrical stimulation in the anterior limb of the internal capsule/bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (IC/BST) alleviates depressive symptoms in severe treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Here we tested the hypothesis that electrical stimulation in either IC/BST or in the inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP) effectively reduces depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). In a double-blind crossover design, the effects of electrical stimulation at both targets were compared in TRD patients. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAM-D) was the primary outcome measure. During the first crossover, patients received IC/BST stimulation versus no stimulation in random order (2 × 1 weeks). During the second crossover (3 × 2 months), patients received IC/BST versus ITP versus no stimulation. Patients and evaluators were blinded for stimulation conditions. All patients (n=7) were followed up for at least 3 years (3–8 years) after implantation. Six patients completed the first crossover and five patients completed the second. During the first crossover, mean (s.d.) HAM-D scores were 21.5 (2.7) for no stimulation and 11.5 (8.8) for IC/BST stimulation. During the second crossover, HAM-D scores were 15.4 (7.5) for no stimulation, 7.6 (3.8) for IC/BST stimulation and 11.2 (7.5) for ITP stimulation. The final sample size was too small to statistically analyze this second crossover. At last follow-up, only one patient preferred ITP over IC/BST stimulation. Two patients, with a history of suicide attempts before implantation, committed suicide during the follow-up phases of this study. Our data indicate that, in the long term, both ITP and IC/BST stimulation may alleviate depressive symptoms in patients suffering from TRD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5682606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56826062017-11-13 Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up Raymaekers, S Luyten, L Bervoets, C Gabriëls, L Nuttin, B Transl Psychiatry Original Article We previously found that electrical stimulation in the anterior limb of the internal capsule/bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (IC/BST) alleviates depressive symptoms in severe treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Here we tested the hypothesis that electrical stimulation in either IC/BST or in the inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP) effectively reduces depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). In a double-blind crossover design, the effects of electrical stimulation at both targets were compared in TRD patients. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAM-D) was the primary outcome measure. During the first crossover, patients received IC/BST stimulation versus no stimulation in random order (2 × 1 weeks). During the second crossover (3 × 2 months), patients received IC/BST versus ITP versus no stimulation. Patients and evaluators were blinded for stimulation conditions. All patients (n=7) were followed up for at least 3 years (3–8 years) after implantation. Six patients completed the first crossover and five patients completed the second. During the first crossover, mean (s.d.) HAM-D scores were 21.5 (2.7) for no stimulation and 11.5 (8.8) for IC/BST stimulation. During the second crossover, HAM-D scores were 15.4 (7.5) for no stimulation, 7.6 (3.8) for IC/BST stimulation and 11.2 (7.5) for ITP stimulation. The final sample size was too small to statistically analyze this second crossover. At last follow-up, only one patient preferred ITP over IC/BST stimulation. Two patients, with a history of suicide attempts before implantation, committed suicide during the follow-up phases of this study. Our data indicate that, in the long term, both ITP and IC/BST stimulation may alleviate depressive symptoms in patients suffering from TRD. Nature Publishing Group 2017-10 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5682606/ /pubmed/29087373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.66 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Raymaekers, S
Luyten, L
Bervoets, C
Gabriëls, L
Nuttin, B
Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up
title Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up
title_full Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up
title_fullStr Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up
title_short Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up
title_sort deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a comparison of two targets and long-term follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29087373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.66
work_keys_str_mv AT raymaekerss deepbrainstimulationfortreatmentresistantmajordepressivedisorderacomparisonoftwotargetsandlongtermfollowup
AT luytenl deepbrainstimulationfortreatmentresistantmajordepressivedisorderacomparisonoftwotargetsandlongtermfollowup
AT bervoetsc deepbrainstimulationfortreatmentresistantmajordepressivedisorderacomparisonoftwotargetsandlongtermfollowup
AT gabrielsl deepbrainstimulationfortreatmentresistantmajordepressivedisorderacomparisonoftwotargetsandlongtermfollowup
AT nuttinb deepbrainstimulationfortreatmentresistantmajordepressivedisorderacomparisonoftwotargetsandlongtermfollowup