Cargando…

A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model

The noninvasive reference standard for myocardial fibrosis detection on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Currently there is no consensus on the preferred method for LGE quantification. Moreover myocardial wall thickening (WT) and strain are measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gho, Johannes M. I. H., van Es, René, van Slochteren, Frebus J., Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J., Hauer, Allard J., van Oorschot, Joep W. M., Doevendans, Pieter A., Leiner, Tim, Vink, Aryan, Asselbergs, Folkert W., Chamuleau, Steven A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y
_version_ 1783278192003383296
author Gho, Johannes M. I. H.
van Es, René
van Slochteren, Frebus J.
Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J.
Hauer, Allard J.
van Oorschot, Joep W. M.
Doevendans, Pieter A.
Leiner, Tim
Vink, Aryan
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Chamuleau, Steven A. J.
author_facet Gho, Johannes M. I. H.
van Es, René
van Slochteren, Frebus J.
Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J.
Hauer, Allard J.
van Oorschot, Joep W. M.
Doevendans, Pieter A.
Leiner, Tim
Vink, Aryan
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Chamuleau, Steven A. J.
author_sort Gho, Johannes M. I. H.
collection PubMed
description The noninvasive reference standard for myocardial fibrosis detection on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Currently there is no consensus on the preferred method for LGE quantification. Moreover myocardial wall thickening (WT) and strain are measures of regional deformation and function. The aim of this research was to systematically compare in vivo CMR parameters, such as LGE, WT and strain, with histological fibrosis quantification. Eight weeks after 90 min ischemia/reperfusion of the LAD artery, 16 pigs underwent in vivo Cine and LGE CMR. Histological sections from transverse heart slices were digitally analysed for fibrosis quantification. Mean fibrosis percentage of analysed sections was related to the different CMR techniques (using segmentation or feature tracking software) for each slice using a linear mixed model analysis. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) technique for quantification of LGE yielded the highest R(2) of 60%. Cine derived myocardial WT explained 16–36% of the histological myocardial fibrosis. The peak circumferential and radial strain measured by feature tracking could explain 15 and 10% of the variance of myocardial fibrosis, respectively. The used method to systematically compare CMR image data with digital histological images is novel and feasible. Myocardial WT and strain were only modestly related with the amount of fibrosis. The fully automatic FWHM analysis technique is the preferred method to detect myocardial fibrosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5682871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56828712017-11-22 A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model Gho, Johannes M. I. H. van Es, René van Slochteren, Frebus J. Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J. Hauer, Allard J. van Oorschot, Joep W. M. Doevendans, Pieter A. Leiner, Tim Vink, Aryan Asselbergs, Folkert W. Chamuleau, Steven A. J. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper The noninvasive reference standard for myocardial fibrosis detection on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Currently there is no consensus on the preferred method for LGE quantification. Moreover myocardial wall thickening (WT) and strain are measures of regional deformation and function. The aim of this research was to systematically compare in vivo CMR parameters, such as LGE, WT and strain, with histological fibrosis quantification. Eight weeks after 90 min ischemia/reperfusion of the LAD artery, 16 pigs underwent in vivo Cine and LGE CMR. Histological sections from transverse heart slices were digitally analysed for fibrosis quantification. Mean fibrosis percentage of analysed sections was related to the different CMR techniques (using segmentation or feature tracking software) for each slice using a linear mixed model analysis. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) technique for quantification of LGE yielded the highest R(2) of 60%. Cine derived myocardial WT explained 16–36% of the histological myocardial fibrosis. The peak circumferential and radial strain measured by feature tracking could explain 15 and 10% of the variance of myocardial fibrosis, respectively. The used method to systematically compare CMR image data with digital histological images is novel and feasible. Myocardial WT and strain were only modestly related with the amount of fibrosis. The fully automatic FWHM analysis technique is the preferred method to detect myocardial fibrosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2017-06-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5682871/ /pubmed/28616762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gho, Johannes M. I. H.
van Es, René
van Slochteren, Frebus J.
Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J.
Hauer, Allard J.
van Oorschot, Joep W. M.
Doevendans, Pieter A.
Leiner, Tim
Vink, Aryan
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Chamuleau, Steven A. J.
A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
title A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
title_full A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
title_fullStr A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
title_full_unstemmed A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
title_short A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
title_sort systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ghojohannesmih asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vanesrene asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vanslochterenfrebusj asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT jansenoflorkeerssannej asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT hauerallardj asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vanoorschotjoepwm asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT doevendanspietera asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT leinertim asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vinkaryan asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT asselbergsfolkertw asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT chamuleaustevenaj asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT ghojohannesmih systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vanesrene systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vanslochterenfrebusj systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT jansenoflorkeerssannej systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT hauerallardj systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vanoorschotjoepwm systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT doevendanspietera systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT leinertim systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT vinkaryan systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT asselbergsfolkertw systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel
AT chamuleaustevenaj systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel