Cargando…
A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model
The noninvasive reference standard for myocardial fibrosis detection on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Currently there is no consensus on the preferred method for LGE quantification. Moreover myocardial wall thickening (WT) and strain are measur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y |
_version_ | 1783278192003383296 |
---|---|
author | Gho, Johannes M. I. H. van Es, René van Slochteren, Frebus J. Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J. Hauer, Allard J. van Oorschot, Joep W. M. Doevendans, Pieter A. Leiner, Tim Vink, Aryan Asselbergs, Folkert W. Chamuleau, Steven A. J. |
author_facet | Gho, Johannes M. I. H. van Es, René van Slochteren, Frebus J. Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J. Hauer, Allard J. van Oorschot, Joep W. M. Doevendans, Pieter A. Leiner, Tim Vink, Aryan Asselbergs, Folkert W. Chamuleau, Steven A. J. |
author_sort | Gho, Johannes M. I. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The noninvasive reference standard for myocardial fibrosis detection on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Currently there is no consensus on the preferred method for LGE quantification. Moreover myocardial wall thickening (WT) and strain are measures of regional deformation and function. The aim of this research was to systematically compare in vivo CMR parameters, such as LGE, WT and strain, with histological fibrosis quantification. Eight weeks after 90 min ischemia/reperfusion of the LAD artery, 16 pigs underwent in vivo Cine and LGE CMR. Histological sections from transverse heart slices were digitally analysed for fibrosis quantification. Mean fibrosis percentage of analysed sections was related to the different CMR techniques (using segmentation or feature tracking software) for each slice using a linear mixed model analysis. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) technique for quantification of LGE yielded the highest R(2) of 60%. Cine derived myocardial WT explained 16–36% of the histological myocardial fibrosis. The peak circumferential and radial strain measured by feature tracking could explain 15 and 10% of the variance of myocardial fibrosis, respectively. The used method to systematically compare CMR image data with digital histological images is novel and feasible. Myocardial WT and strain were only modestly related with the amount of fibrosis. The fully automatic FWHM analysis technique is the preferred method to detect myocardial fibrosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5682871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56828712017-11-22 A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model Gho, Johannes M. I. H. van Es, René van Slochteren, Frebus J. Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J. Hauer, Allard J. van Oorschot, Joep W. M. Doevendans, Pieter A. Leiner, Tim Vink, Aryan Asselbergs, Folkert W. Chamuleau, Steven A. J. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper The noninvasive reference standard for myocardial fibrosis detection on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Currently there is no consensus on the preferred method for LGE quantification. Moreover myocardial wall thickening (WT) and strain are measures of regional deformation and function. The aim of this research was to systematically compare in vivo CMR parameters, such as LGE, WT and strain, with histological fibrosis quantification. Eight weeks after 90 min ischemia/reperfusion of the LAD artery, 16 pigs underwent in vivo Cine and LGE CMR. Histological sections from transverse heart slices were digitally analysed for fibrosis quantification. Mean fibrosis percentage of analysed sections was related to the different CMR techniques (using segmentation or feature tracking software) for each slice using a linear mixed model analysis. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) technique for quantification of LGE yielded the highest R(2) of 60%. Cine derived myocardial WT explained 16–36% of the histological myocardial fibrosis. The peak circumferential and radial strain measured by feature tracking could explain 15 and 10% of the variance of myocardial fibrosis, respectively. The used method to systematically compare CMR image data with digital histological images is novel and feasible. Myocardial WT and strain were only modestly related with the amount of fibrosis. The fully automatic FWHM analysis technique is the preferred method to detect myocardial fibrosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2017-06-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5682871/ /pubmed/28616762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gho, Johannes M. I. H. van Es, René van Slochteren, Frebus J. Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J. Hauer, Allard J. van Oorschot, Joep W. M. Doevendans, Pieter A. Leiner, Tim Vink, Aryan Asselbergs, Folkert W. Chamuleau, Steven A. J. A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model |
title | A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model |
title_full | A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model |
title_fullStr | A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model |
title_short | A systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model |
title_sort | systematic comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and high resolution histological fibrosis quantification in a chronic porcine infarct model |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1187-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghojohannesmih asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vanesrene asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vanslochterenfrebusj asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT jansenoflorkeerssannej asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT hauerallardj asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vanoorschotjoepwm asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT doevendanspietera asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT leinertim asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vinkaryan asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT asselbergsfolkertw asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT chamuleaustevenaj asystematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT ghojohannesmih systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vanesrene systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vanslochterenfrebusj systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT jansenoflorkeerssannej systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT hauerallardj systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vanoorschotjoepwm systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT doevendanspietera systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT leinertim systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT vinkaryan systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT asselbergsfolkertw systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel AT chamuleaustevenaj systematiccomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandhighresolutionhistologicalfibrosisquantificationinachronicporcineinfarctmodel |