Cargando…

Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relation of the intakes of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwingshackl, Lukas, Schwedhelm, Carolina, Hoffmann, Georg, Knüppel, Sven, Iqbal, Khalid, Andriolo, Violetta, Bechthold, Angela, Schlesinger, Sabrina, Boeing, Heiner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Nutrition 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/an.117.017178
_version_ 1783278205195517952
author Schwingshackl, Lukas
Schwedhelm, Carolina
Hoffmann, Georg
Knüppel, Sven
Iqbal, Khalid
Andriolo, Violetta
Bechthold, Angela
Schlesinger, Sabrina
Boeing, Heiner
author_facet Schwingshackl, Lukas
Schwedhelm, Carolina
Hoffmann, Georg
Knüppel, Sven
Iqbal, Khalid
Andriolo, Violetta
Bechthold, Angela
Schlesinger, Sabrina
Boeing, Heiner
author_sort Schwingshackl, Lukas
collection PubMed
description The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relation of the intakes of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) with the risk of hypertension. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically until June 2017 for prospective studies having quantitatively investigated the above-mentioned foods. We conducted meta-analysis on the highest compared with the lowest intake categories and linear and nonlinear dose-response meta-analyses to analyze the association. Summary RRs and 95% CIs were estimated by using a random-effects model. Overall, 28 reports were included in the meta-analysis. An inverse association for the risk of hypertension was observed for 30 g whole grains/d (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.98), 100 g fruits/d (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99), 28 g nuts/d (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.08), and 200 g dairy/d (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.97), whereas a positive association for 100 g red meat/d (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.28), 50 g processed meat/d (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26), and 250 mL SSB/d (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.10) was seen in the linear dose-response meta-analysis. Indication for nonlinear relations of the intakes of whole grains, fruits, fish, and processed meats with the risk of hypertension was detected. In summary, this comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis of 28 reports identified optimal intakes of whole grains, fruits, nuts, legumes, dairy, red and processed meats, and SSBs related to the risk of hypertension. These findings need to be seen under the light of very-low to low quality of meta-evidence. However, the findings support the current dietary guidelines in the prevention of hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Society for Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56830072018-11-01 Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies Schwingshackl, Lukas Schwedhelm, Carolina Hoffmann, Georg Knüppel, Sven Iqbal, Khalid Andriolo, Violetta Bechthold, Angela Schlesinger, Sabrina Boeing, Heiner Adv Nutr Reviews The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relation of the intakes of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) with the risk of hypertension. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically until June 2017 for prospective studies having quantitatively investigated the above-mentioned foods. We conducted meta-analysis on the highest compared with the lowest intake categories and linear and nonlinear dose-response meta-analyses to analyze the association. Summary RRs and 95% CIs were estimated by using a random-effects model. Overall, 28 reports were included in the meta-analysis. An inverse association for the risk of hypertension was observed for 30 g whole grains/d (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.98), 100 g fruits/d (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99), 28 g nuts/d (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.08), and 200 g dairy/d (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.97), whereas a positive association for 100 g red meat/d (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.28), 50 g processed meat/d (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26), and 250 mL SSB/d (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.10) was seen in the linear dose-response meta-analysis. Indication for nonlinear relations of the intakes of whole grains, fruits, fish, and processed meats with the risk of hypertension was detected. In summary, this comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis of 28 reports identified optimal intakes of whole grains, fruits, nuts, legumes, dairy, red and processed meats, and SSBs related to the risk of hypertension. These findings need to be seen under the light of very-low to low quality of meta-evidence. However, the findings support the current dietary guidelines in the prevention of hypertension. American Society for Nutrition 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5683007/ /pubmed/29141965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/an.117.017178 Text en © 2017 American Society for Nutrition This is a free access article, distributed under terms (http://www.nutrition.org/publications/guidelines-and-policies/license/) that permit unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Schwingshackl, Lukas
Schwedhelm, Carolina
Hoffmann, Georg
Knüppel, Sven
Iqbal, Khalid
Andriolo, Violetta
Bechthold, Angela
Schlesinger, Sabrina
Boeing, Heiner
Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_fullStr Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full_unstemmed Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_short Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_sort food groups and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/an.117.017178
work_keys_str_mv AT schwingshackllukas foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT schwedhelmcarolina foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT hoffmanngeorg foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT knuppelsven foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT iqbalkhalid foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT andriolovioletta foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT bechtholdangela foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT schlesingersabrina foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT boeingheiner foodgroupsandriskofhypertensionasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies