Cargando…

Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maughan, Elizabeth F., Hynds, Robert E., Proctor, Toby J., Janes, Sam M., Elliott, Martin, Birchall, Martin A., Lowdell, Mark W., De Coppi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical data exploring the various options for achieving such seeding. RECENT FINDINGS: Various cell combinations, delivery strategies, and outcome measures are described. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most widely employed cell type in tracheal bioengineering. Airway epithelial cell luminal seeding is also widely employed, alone or in combination with other cell types. Combinations have thus far shown the greatest promise. Chondrocytes may improve mechanical outcomes in pre-clinical models, but have not been clinically tested. Rapid or pre-vascularization of scaffolds is an important consideration. Overall, there are few published objective measures of post-seeding cell viability, survival, or overall efficacy. SUMMARY: There is no clear consensus on the optimal cell-scaffold combination and mechanisms for seeding. Systematic in vivo work is required to assess differences between tracheal grafts seeded with combinations of clinically deliverable cell types using objective outcome measures, including those for functionality and host immune response. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.