Cargando…

Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maughan, Elizabeth F., Hynds, Robert E., Proctor, Toby J., Janes, Sam M., Elliott, Martin, Birchall, Martin A., Lowdell, Mark W., De Coppi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2
_version_ 1783278211873898496
author Maughan, Elizabeth F.
Hynds, Robert E.
Proctor, Toby J.
Janes, Sam M.
Elliott, Martin
Birchall, Martin A.
Lowdell, Mark W.
De Coppi, Paolo
author_facet Maughan, Elizabeth F.
Hynds, Robert E.
Proctor, Toby J.
Janes, Sam M.
Elliott, Martin
Birchall, Martin A.
Lowdell, Mark W.
De Coppi, Paolo
author_sort Maughan, Elizabeth F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical data exploring the various options for achieving such seeding. RECENT FINDINGS: Various cell combinations, delivery strategies, and outcome measures are described. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most widely employed cell type in tracheal bioengineering. Airway epithelial cell luminal seeding is also widely employed, alone or in combination with other cell types. Combinations have thus far shown the greatest promise. Chondrocytes may improve mechanical outcomes in pre-clinical models, but have not been clinically tested. Rapid or pre-vascularization of scaffolds is an important consideration. Overall, there are few published objective measures of post-seeding cell viability, survival, or overall efficacy. SUMMARY: There is no clear consensus on the optimal cell-scaffold combination and mechanisms for seeding. Systematic in vivo work is required to assess differences between tracheal grafts seeded with combinations of clinically deliverable cell types using objective outcome measures, including those for functionality and host immune response. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56830582017-11-22 Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering Maughan, Elizabeth F. Hynds, Robert E. Proctor, Toby J. Janes, Sam M. Elliott, Martin Birchall, Martin A. Lowdell, Mark W. De Coppi, Paolo Curr Stem Cell Rep Cellular Therapies: Preclinical and Clinical (EM Horwitz, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical data exploring the various options for achieving such seeding. RECENT FINDINGS: Various cell combinations, delivery strategies, and outcome measures are described. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most widely employed cell type in tracheal bioengineering. Airway epithelial cell luminal seeding is also widely employed, alone or in combination with other cell types. Combinations have thus far shown the greatest promise. Chondrocytes may improve mechanical outcomes in pre-clinical models, but have not been clinically tested. Rapid or pre-vascularization of scaffolds is an important consideration. Overall, there are few published objective measures of post-seeding cell viability, survival, or overall efficacy. SUMMARY: There is no clear consensus on the optimal cell-scaffold combination and mechanisms for seeding. Systematic in vivo work is required to assess differences between tracheal grafts seeded with combinations of clinically deliverable cell types using objective outcome measures, including those for functionality and host immune response. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-10-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5683058/ /pubmed/29177132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Cellular Therapies: Preclinical and Clinical (EM Horwitz, Section Editor)
Maughan, Elizabeth F.
Hynds, Robert E.
Proctor, Toby J.
Janes, Sam M.
Elliott, Martin
Birchall, Martin A.
Lowdell, Mark W.
De Coppi, Paolo
Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering
title Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering
title_full Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering
title_short Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering
title_sort autologous cell seeding in tracheal tissue engineering
topic Cellular Therapies: Preclinical and Clinical (EM Horwitz, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2
work_keys_str_mv AT maughanelizabethf autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering
AT hyndsroberte autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering
AT proctortobyj autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering
AT janessamm autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering
AT elliottmartin autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering
AT birchallmartina autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering
AT lowdellmarkw autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering
AT decoppipaolo autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering