Cargando…
Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical da...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2 |
_version_ | 1783278211873898496 |
---|---|
author | Maughan, Elizabeth F. Hynds, Robert E. Proctor, Toby J. Janes, Sam M. Elliott, Martin Birchall, Martin A. Lowdell, Mark W. De Coppi, Paolo |
author_facet | Maughan, Elizabeth F. Hynds, Robert E. Proctor, Toby J. Janes, Sam M. Elliott, Martin Birchall, Martin A. Lowdell, Mark W. De Coppi, Paolo |
author_sort | Maughan, Elizabeth F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical data exploring the various options for achieving such seeding. RECENT FINDINGS: Various cell combinations, delivery strategies, and outcome measures are described. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most widely employed cell type in tracheal bioengineering. Airway epithelial cell luminal seeding is also widely employed, alone or in combination with other cell types. Combinations have thus far shown the greatest promise. Chondrocytes may improve mechanical outcomes in pre-clinical models, but have not been clinically tested. Rapid or pre-vascularization of scaffolds is an important consideration. Overall, there are few published objective measures of post-seeding cell viability, survival, or overall efficacy. SUMMARY: There is no clear consensus on the optimal cell-scaffold combination and mechanisms for seeding. Systematic in vivo work is required to assess differences between tracheal grafts seeded with combinations of clinically deliverable cell types using objective outcome measures, including those for functionality and host immune response. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5683058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56830582017-11-22 Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering Maughan, Elizabeth F. Hynds, Robert E. Proctor, Toby J. Janes, Sam M. Elliott, Martin Birchall, Martin A. Lowdell, Mark W. De Coppi, Paolo Curr Stem Cell Rep Cellular Therapies: Preclinical and Clinical (EM Horwitz, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no consensus on the best technology to be employed for tracheal replacement. One particularly promising approach is based upon tissue engineering and involves applying autologous cells to transplantable scaffolds. Here, we present the reported pre-clinical and clinical data exploring the various options for achieving such seeding. RECENT FINDINGS: Various cell combinations, delivery strategies, and outcome measures are described. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most widely employed cell type in tracheal bioengineering. Airway epithelial cell luminal seeding is also widely employed, alone or in combination with other cell types. Combinations have thus far shown the greatest promise. Chondrocytes may improve mechanical outcomes in pre-clinical models, but have not been clinically tested. Rapid or pre-vascularization of scaffolds is an important consideration. Overall, there are few published objective measures of post-seeding cell viability, survival, or overall efficacy. SUMMARY: There is no clear consensus on the optimal cell-scaffold combination and mechanisms for seeding. Systematic in vivo work is required to assess differences between tracheal grafts seeded with combinations of clinically deliverable cell types using objective outcome measures, including those for functionality and host immune response. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-10-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5683058/ /pubmed/29177132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Cellular Therapies: Preclinical and Clinical (EM Horwitz, Section Editor) Maughan, Elizabeth F. Hynds, Robert E. Proctor, Toby J. Janes, Sam M. Elliott, Martin Birchall, Martin A. Lowdell, Mark W. De Coppi, Paolo Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering |
title | Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering |
title_full | Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering |
title_short | Autologous Cell Seeding in Tracheal Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | autologous cell seeding in tracheal tissue engineering |
topic | Cellular Therapies: Preclinical and Clinical (EM Horwitz, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40778-017-0108-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maughanelizabethf autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering AT hyndsroberte autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering AT proctortobyj autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering AT janessamm autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering AT elliottmartin autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering AT birchallmartina autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering AT lowdellmarkw autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering AT decoppipaolo autologouscellseedingintrachealtissueengineering |