Cargando…

Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: In many countries health policy encourages patients to choose their hospital, preferably by considering information of performance reports. Previous studies on hospital choice mainly have focused on patients undergoing elective surgery. This study examined a representative sample of hosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Cruppé, Werner, Geraedts, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2712-3
_version_ 1783278261509292032
author de Cruppé, Werner
Geraedts, Max
author_facet de Cruppé, Werner
Geraedts, Max
author_sort de Cruppé, Werner
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In many countries health policy encourages patients to choose their hospital, preferably by considering information of performance reports. Previous studies on hospital choice mainly have focused on patients undergoing elective surgery. This study examined a representative sample of hospital inpatients across disciplines and treatment interventions in Germany. Its research questions were: How many patients decide where to go for hospital treatment? How much time do patients have before admission? Which sources of information do they use, and which criteria are relevant to their decision? METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study covering 1925 inpatients of 46 departments at 17 hospitals in 2012. The stratified survey comprised 11 medical disciplines (internal medicine, gynaecology, obstetrics, paediatrics, psychiatry, orthopaedics, neurology, urology, ENT and geriatrics) on 3 hospital care levels representing 91.9% of all hospital admissions to inpatient care in Germany in 2012. The statistical analysis calculated the frequency distributions and 95% confidence intervals of characteristics related to the hospital choice. RESULTS: 63.0% [60.9–65.2] of patients in Germany chose the hospital themselves, but only 21.1% [19.3–22.9] had more than one week to decide prior to admission. Major sources of information were personal knowledge of hospitals, relatives, outpatient health professionals and the Internet. Main criteria for the decision were personal experience with a hospital, recommendations from relatives and providers of outpatient services, a hospital’s reputation and distance from home. Specific quality information as provided by performance reports were of secondary importance. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients in the German health system choose their hospital freely. Providers of outpatient health care can have an important “agent” function in the quality-oriented hospital choice especially for patients with little time prior to admission and those who do not decide themselves. Hospitals have an impact on patients’ future hospital choices by the treatment experience they provide to patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2712-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56833282017-11-20 Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study de Cruppé, Werner Geraedts, Max BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In many countries health policy encourages patients to choose their hospital, preferably by considering information of performance reports. Previous studies on hospital choice mainly have focused on patients undergoing elective surgery. This study examined a representative sample of hospital inpatients across disciplines and treatment interventions in Germany. Its research questions were: How many patients decide where to go for hospital treatment? How much time do patients have before admission? Which sources of information do they use, and which criteria are relevant to their decision? METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study covering 1925 inpatients of 46 departments at 17 hospitals in 2012. The stratified survey comprised 11 medical disciplines (internal medicine, gynaecology, obstetrics, paediatrics, psychiatry, orthopaedics, neurology, urology, ENT and geriatrics) on 3 hospital care levels representing 91.9% of all hospital admissions to inpatient care in Germany in 2012. The statistical analysis calculated the frequency distributions and 95% confidence intervals of characteristics related to the hospital choice. RESULTS: 63.0% [60.9–65.2] of patients in Germany chose the hospital themselves, but only 21.1% [19.3–22.9] had more than one week to decide prior to admission. Major sources of information were personal knowledge of hospitals, relatives, outpatient health professionals and the Internet. Main criteria for the decision were personal experience with a hospital, recommendations from relatives and providers of outpatient services, a hospital’s reputation and distance from home. Specific quality information as provided by performance reports were of secondary importance. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients in the German health system choose their hospital freely. Providers of outpatient health care can have an important “agent” function in the quality-oriented hospital choice especially for patients with little time prior to admission and those who do not decide themselves. Hospitals have an impact on patients’ future hospital choices by the treatment experience they provide to patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2712-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683328/ /pubmed/29132430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2712-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Cruppé, Werner
Geraedts, Max
Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study
title Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study
title_full Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study
title_short Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study
title_sort hospital choice in germany from the patient’s perspective: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2712-3
work_keys_str_mv AT decruppewerner hospitalchoiceingermanyfromthepatientsperspectiveacrosssectionalstudy
AT geraedtsmax hospitalchoiceingermanyfromthepatientsperspectiveacrosssectionalstudy