Cargando…

Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway

BACKGROUND: The increasing rate of intrapartum cesarean sections is subject of attention and concern as it is associated with adverse outcomes. Labor dystocia is one of the most frequent indications for cesarean sections even though there is no consensus on criteria for labor dystocia. Traditionally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernitz, Stine, Dalbye, Rebecka, Øian, Pål, Zhang, Jun, Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, Blix, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1553-8
_version_ 1783278270377099264
author Bernitz, Stine
Dalbye, Rebecka
Øian, Pål
Zhang, Jun
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe
Blix, Ellen
author_facet Bernitz, Stine
Dalbye, Rebecka
Øian, Pål
Zhang, Jun
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe
Blix, Ellen
author_sort Bernitz, Stine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing rate of intrapartum cesarean sections is subject of attention and concern as it is associated with adverse outcomes. Labor dystocia is one of the most frequent indications for cesarean sections even though there is no consensus on criteria for labor dystocia. Traditionally the progression of labor follows guidelines based on Friedman’s curve from the mid 1950s. In 2010 Zhang presented a new labor curve and a dynamic guideline for labor progression based on contemporary research. The main aim of this trial is to evaluate whether adhering to Zhang’s guideline for labor progression, changes the intrapartum cesarean section rate in nulliparous women without jeopardising maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to a traditional guide line called the 4-h action line based on Friedman’s curve. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter cluster randomized trial including 14 birth care units in Norway is conducted. Seven units are randomized to use the 4-h action line guideline for labor progression and seven units are randomized to use Zhang’s new dynamic guideline for labor progression, for all nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in a cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labor at term. Clinical outcomes are compared between the groups. The determination of the sample size (number of clusters and individuals) is based on a power calculation of intrapartum cesarean section, which is 9.2% in the study population (p1). Further, we expect that the intrapartum cesarean section rate will be 6.7% (p2) which is a 25% reduction, when using the new guideline. With a chosen significance level of 0.05, a power of 80% and p1 = 9.2% and p2 = 6.9%, we should include at least 14 clusters and 6582 individuals. DISCUSSION: Clinical consequences when using the guideline by Zhang have, to the best of our knowledge, not been investigated earlier. The results will provide a strong basis to make a qualified decision on whether it is beneficial to introduce a dynamic labor progression curve in contemporary obstetrics both nationally and internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials, NCT02221427
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56833652017-11-20 Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway Bernitz, Stine Dalbye, Rebecka Øian, Pål Zhang, Jun Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe Blix, Ellen BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The increasing rate of intrapartum cesarean sections is subject of attention and concern as it is associated with adverse outcomes. Labor dystocia is one of the most frequent indications for cesarean sections even though there is no consensus on criteria for labor dystocia. Traditionally the progression of labor follows guidelines based on Friedman’s curve from the mid 1950s. In 2010 Zhang presented a new labor curve and a dynamic guideline for labor progression based on contemporary research. The main aim of this trial is to evaluate whether adhering to Zhang’s guideline for labor progression, changes the intrapartum cesarean section rate in nulliparous women without jeopardising maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to a traditional guide line called the 4-h action line based on Friedman’s curve. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter cluster randomized trial including 14 birth care units in Norway is conducted. Seven units are randomized to use the 4-h action line guideline for labor progression and seven units are randomized to use Zhang’s new dynamic guideline for labor progression, for all nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in a cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labor at term. Clinical outcomes are compared between the groups. The determination of the sample size (number of clusters and individuals) is based on a power calculation of intrapartum cesarean section, which is 9.2% in the study population (p1). Further, we expect that the intrapartum cesarean section rate will be 6.7% (p2) which is a 25% reduction, when using the new guideline. With a chosen significance level of 0.05, a power of 80% and p1 = 9.2% and p2 = 6.9%, we should include at least 14 clusters and 6582 individuals. DISCUSSION: Clinical consequences when using the guideline by Zhang have, to the best of our knowledge, not been investigated earlier. The results will provide a strong basis to make a qualified decision on whether it is beneficial to introduce a dynamic labor progression curve in contemporary obstetrics both nationally and internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials, NCT02221427 BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683365/ /pubmed/29132336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1553-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bernitz, Stine
Dalbye, Rebecka
Øian, Pål
Zhang, Jun
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe
Blix, Ellen
Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway
title Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway
title_full Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway
title_fullStr Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway
title_short Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway
title_sort study protocol: the labor progression study, laps - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? a multicenter, cluster randomized trial in norway
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1553-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bernitzstine studyprotocolthelaborprogressionstudylapsdoestheuseofadynamicprogressionguidelineinlaborreducetherateofintrapartumcesareansectionsinnulliparouswomenamulticenterclusterrandomizedtrialinnorway
AT dalbyerebecka studyprotocolthelaborprogressionstudylapsdoestheuseofadynamicprogressionguidelineinlaborreducetherateofintrapartumcesareansectionsinnulliparouswomenamulticenterclusterrandomizedtrialinnorway
AT øianpal studyprotocolthelaborprogressionstudylapsdoestheuseofadynamicprogressionguidelineinlaborreducetherateofintrapartumcesareansectionsinnulliparouswomenamulticenterclusterrandomizedtrialinnorway
AT zhangjun studyprotocolthelaborprogressionstudylapsdoestheuseofadynamicprogressionguidelineinlaborreducetherateofintrapartumcesareansectionsinnulliparouswomenamulticenterclusterrandomizedtrialinnorway
AT eggebøtorbjørnmoe studyprotocolthelaborprogressionstudylapsdoestheuseofadynamicprogressionguidelineinlaborreducetherateofintrapartumcesareansectionsinnulliparouswomenamulticenterclusterrandomizedtrialinnorway
AT blixellen studyprotocolthelaborprogressionstudylapsdoestheuseofadynamicprogressionguidelineinlaborreducetherateofintrapartumcesareansectionsinnulliparouswomenamulticenterclusterrandomizedtrialinnorway