Cargando…
An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU
The decision to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the optimal timing for commencement is a difficult decision faced by clinicians when treating acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care setting. Without clinically significant ureamic symptoms or emergent indications (electrolyte abn...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1868-x |
_version_ | 1783278276917067776 |
---|---|
author | Mackenzie, Jack Chacko, Bobby |
author_facet | Mackenzie, Jack Chacko, Bobby |
author_sort | Mackenzie, Jack |
collection | PubMed |
description | The decision to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the optimal timing for commencement is a difficult decision faced by clinicians when treating acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care setting. Without clinically significant ureamic symptoms or emergent indications (electrolyte abnormalities, volume overload) the timing of RRT initiation remains contentious and inconsistent across health providers. Current trends of initiating RRT in the ICU are often based on isolated blood urea levels without clear guidelines demonstrating an upper limit for treatment. Although the appropriate upper limit remains unclear, it is reasonable to conclude that a blood urea level less than 40 mmol/L is not in itself an indication for RRT, especially in the absence of supporting evidence of kidney impairment (anuria, elevated serum creatinine), presenting a welcome reminder to treat the patient and not a number. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5683443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56834432017-11-20 An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU Mackenzie, Jack Chacko, Bobby Crit Care Editorial The decision to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the optimal timing for commencement is a difficult decision faced by clinicians when treating acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care setting. Without clinically significant ureamic symptoms or emergent indications (electrolyte abnormalities, volume overload) the timing of RRT initiation remains contentious and inconsistent across health providers. Current trends of initiating RRT in the ICU are often based on isolated blood urea levels without clear guidelines demonstrating an upper limit for treatment. Although the appropriate upper limit remains unclear, it is reasonable to conclude that a blood urea level less than 40 mmol/L is not in itself an indication for RRT, especially in the absence of supporting evidence of kidney impairment (anuria, elevated serum creatinine), presenting a welcome reminder to treat the patient and not a number. BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683443/ /pubmed/29132411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1868-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Mackenzie, Jack Chacko, Bobby An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU |
title | An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU |
title_full | An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU |
title_fullStr | An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU |
title_full_unstemmed | An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU |
title_short | An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU |
title_sort | isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the icu |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1868-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mackenziejack anisolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu AT chackobobby anisolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu AT mackenziejack isolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu AT chackobobby isolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu |