Cargando…

An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU

The decision to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the optimal timing for commencement is a difficult decision faced by clinicians when treating acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care setting. Without clinically significant ureamic symptoms or emergent indications (electrolyte abn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackenzie, Jack, Chacko, Bobby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1868-x
_version_ 1783278276917067776
author Mackenzie, Jack
Chacko, Bobby
author_facet Mackenzie, Jack
Chacko, Bobby
author_sort Mackenzie, Jack
collection PubMed
description The decision to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the optimal timing for commencement is a difficult decision faced by clinicians when treating acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care setting. Without clinically significant ureamic symptoms or emergent indications (electrolyte abnormalities, volume overload) the timing of RRT initiation remains contentious and inconsistent across health providers. Current trends of initiating RRT in the ICU are often based on isolated blood urea levels without clear guidelines demonstrating an upper limit for treatment. Although the appropriate upper limit remains unclear, it is reasonable to conclude that a blood urea level less than 40 mmol/L is not in itself an indication for RRT, especially in the absence of supporting evidence of kidney impairment (anuria, elevated serum creatinine), presenting a welcome reminder to treat the patient and not a number.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56834432017-11-20 An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU Mackenzie, Jack Chacko, Bobby Crit Care Editorial The decision to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the optimal timing for commencement is a difficult decision faced by clinicians when treating acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care setting. Without clinically significant ureamic symptoms or emergent indications (electrolyte abnormalities, volume overload) the timing of RRT initiation remains contentious and inconsistent across health providers. Current trends of initiating RRT in the ICU are often based on isolated blood urea levels without clear guidelines demonstrating an upper limit for treatment. Although the appropriate upper limit remains unclear, it is reasonable to conclude that a blood urea level less than 40 mmol/L is not in itself an indication for RRT, especially in the absence of supporting evidence of kidney impairment (anuria, elevated serum creatinine), presenting a welcome reminder to treat the patient and not a number. BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683443/ /pubmed/29132411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1868-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Editorial
Mackenzie, Jack
Chacko, Bobby
An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU
title An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU
title_full An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU
title_fullStr An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU
title_full_unstemmed An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU
title_short An isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the ICU
title_sort isolated elevation in blood urea level is not ‘uraemia’ and not an indication for renal replacement therapy in the icu
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1868-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenziejack anisolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu
AT chackobobby anisolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu
AT mackenziejack isolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu
AT chackobobby isolatedelevationinbloodurealevelisnoturaemiaandnotanindicationforrenalreplacementtherapyintheicu