Cargando…

Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis

BACKGROUND: Viruses undergo extensive evolutionary selection for efficient replication which effects, among others, their codon distribution. In the current study, we aimed at understanding the way evolution shapes the codon distribution in early vs. late viral genes in terms of their expression dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mioduser, Oriah, Goz, Eli, Tuller, Tamir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4248-7
_version_ 1783278282623418368
author Mioduser, Oriah
Goz, Eli
Tuller, Tamir
author_facet Mioduser, Oriah
Goz, Eli
Tuller, Tamir
author_sort Mioduser, Oriah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Viruses undergo extensive evolutionary selection for efficient replication which effects, among others, their codon distribution. In the current study, we aimed at understanding the way evolution shapes the codon distribution in early vs. late viral genes in terms of their expression during different stages in the viral replication cycle. To this end we analyzed 14 bacteriophages and 11 human viruses with available information about the expression phases of their genes. RESULTS: We demonstrated evidence of selection for distinct composition of synonymous codons in early and late viral genes in 50% of the analyzed bacteriophages. Among others, this phenomenon may be related to the time specific adaptation of the viral genes to the translation efficiency factors involved at different bacteriophage developmental stages. Specifically, we showed that the differences in codon composition in different temporal gene groups cannot be explained only by phylogenetic proximities between the analyzed bacteriophages, and can be partially explained by differences in the adaptation to the host tRNA pool, nucleotide bias, GC content and more. In contrast, no difference in temporal regulation of synonymous codon usage was observed in human viruses, possibly because of a stronger selection pressure due to a larger effective population size in bacteriophages and their bacterial hosts. CONCLUSIONS: The codon distribution in large fractions of bacteriophage genomes tend to be different in early and late genes. This phenomenon seems to be related to various aspects of the viral life cycle, and to various intracellular processes. We believe that the reported results should contribute towards better understanding of viral evolution and may promote the development of relevant procedures in synthetic virology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-017-4248-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56834542017-11-20 Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis Mioduser, Oriah Goz, Eli Tuller, Tamir BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Viruses undergo extensive evolutionary selection for efficient replication which effects, among others, their codon distribution. In the current study, we aimed at understanding the way evolution shapes the codon distribution in early vs. late viral genes in terms of their expression during different stages in the viral replication cycle. To this end we analyzed 14 bacteriophages and 11 human viruses with available information about the expression phases of their genes. RESULTS: We demonstrated evidence of selection for distinct composition of synonymous codons in early and late viral genes in 50% of the analyzed bacteriophages. Among others, this phenomenon may be related to the time specific adaptation of the viral genes to the translation efficiency factors involved at different bacteriophage developmental stages. Specifically, we showed that the differences in codon composition in different temporal gene groups cannot be explained only by phylogenetic proximities between the analyzed bacteriophages, and can be partially explained by differences in the adaptation to the host tRNA pool, nucleotide bias, GC content and more. In contrast, no difference in temporal regulation of synonymous codon usage was observed in human viruses, possibly because of a stronger selection pressure due to a larger effective population size in bacteriophages and their bacterial hosts. CONCLUSIONS: The codon distribution in large fractions of bacteriophage genomes tend to be different in early and late genes. This phenomenon seems to be related to various aspects of the viral life cycle, and to various intracellular processes. We believe that the reported results should contribute towards better understanding of viral evolution and may promote the development of relevant procedures in synthetic virology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-017-4248-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683454/ /pubmed/29132309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4248-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mioduser, Oriah
Goz, Eli
Tuller, Tamir
Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis
title Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis
title_full Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis
title_fullStr Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis
title_full_unstemmed Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis
title_short Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis
title_sort significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4248-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mioduseroriah significantdifferencesintermsofcodonusagebiasbetweenbacteriophageearlyandlategenesacomparativegenomicsanalysis
AT gozeli significantdifferencesintermsofcodonusagebiasbetweenbacteriophageearlyandlategenesacomparativegenomicsanalysis
AT tullertamir significantdifferencesintermsofcodonusagebiasbetweenbacteriophageearlyandlategenesacomparativegenomicsanalysis