Cargando…

Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students

BACKGROUND: Society expects physicians to perform perfectly but high levels of perfectionism are associated with symptoms of distress in medical students. This study investigated whether medical students admitted to medical school by different selection criteria differ in the occurrence of perfectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seeliger, Helen, Harendza, Sigrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1034-9
_version_ 1783278306066432000
author Seeliger, Helen
Harendza, Sigrid
author_facet Seeliger, Helen
Harendza, Sigrid
author_sort Seeliger, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Society expects physicians to perform perfectly but high levels of perfectionism are associated with symptoms of distress in medical students. This study investigated whether medical students admitted to medical school by different selection criteria differ in the occurrence of perfectionism. METHODS: Newly enrolled undergraduate medical students (n = 358) filled out the following instruments: Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS-H), Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS-F), Big Five Inventory (BFI-10), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7). Sociodemographic data such as age, gender, high school degrees, and the way of admission to medical school were also included in the questionnaire. RESULTS: The 298 participating students had significantly lower scores in Socially-Prescribed Perfectionism than the general population independently of their way of admission to medical school. Students who were selected for medical school by their high school degree showed the highest score for Adaptive Perfectionism. Maladaptive Perfectionism was the strongest predictor for the occurrence symptoms of depression and anxiety regardless of the way of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Students from all admission groups should be observed longitudinally for performance and to assess whether perfectionism questionnaires might be an additional useful instrument for medical school admission processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56835412017-11-20 Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students Seeliger, Helen Harendza, Sigrid BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Society expects physicians to perform perfectly but high levels of perfectionism are associated with symptoms of distress in medical students. This study investigated whether medical students admitted to medical school by different selection criteria differ in the occurrence of perfectionism. METHODS: Newly enrolled undergraduate medical students (n = 358) filled out the following instruments: Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS-H), Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS-F), Big Five Inventory (BFI-10), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7). Sociodemographic data such as age, gender, high school degrees, and the way of admission to medical school were also included in the questionnaire. RESULTS: The 298 participating students had significantly lower scores in Socially-Prescribed Perfectionism than the general population independently of their way of admission to medical school. Students who were selected for medical school by their high school degree showed the highest score for Adaptive Perfectionism. Maladaptive Perfectionism was the strongest predictor for the occurrence symptoms of depression and anxiety regardless of the way of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Students from all admission groups should be observed longitudinally for performance and to assess whether perfectionism questionnaires might be an additional useful instrument for medical school admission processes. BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683541/ /pubmed/29132334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1034-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seeliger, Helen
Harendza, Sigrid
Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students
title Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students
title_full Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students
title_fullStr Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students
title_full_unstemmed Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students
title_short Is perfect good? – Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students
title_sort is perfect good? – dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1034-9
work_keys_str_mv AT seeligerhelen isperfectgooddimensionsofperfectionisminnewlyadmittedmedicalstudents
AT harendzasigrid isperfectgooddimensionsofperfectionisminnewlyadmittedmedicalstudents