Cargando…

“I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support

BACKGROUND: The social gradient in smoking rates persist with an overrepresentation of smoking and its associated harms concentrated within lower socioeconomic status (SES) populations. Low-SES smokers are motivated to quit but face multiple barriers when engaging a quit attempt. An understanding of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boland, Veronica C., Mattick, Richard P., McRobbie, Hayden, Siahpush, Mohammad, Courtney, Ryan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0689-5
_version_ 1783278314419388416
author Boland, Veronica C.
Mattick, Richard P.
McRobbie, Hayden
Siahpush, Mohammad
Courtney, Ryan J.
author_facet Boland, Veronica C.
Mattick, Richard P.
McRobbie, Hayden
Siahpush, Mohammad
Courtney, Ryan J.
author_sort Boland, Veronica C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The social gradient in smoking rates persist with an overrepresentation of smoking and its associated harms concentrated within lower socioeconomic status (SES) populations. Low-SES smokers are motivated to quit but face multiple barriers when engaging a quit attempt. An understanding of the current treatment service model from the perspectives of treatment-seeking low-SES smokers is needed to inform the design of alternative smoking cessation support services tailored to the needs of low-SES populations. This qualitative study aimed to: i) explore low-SES smokers’ recent quitting experiences; ii) assess factors that impact treatment engagement; and iii) determine the acceptability and feasibility of alternative approaches to smoking cessation. METHOD: Low-SES participants (n = 24) previously enrolled in a smoking cessation RCT participated in either a semi-structured focus group or in-depth telephone interview. Data was obtained and analysed using thematic analysis from October 2015 to June 2016. Analysis was deductive from the interview guide and supplemented inductively. RESULTS: Participants expressed feelings of guilt and shame around their smoking behaviour and experienced stigmatisation for their smoking. Guilt, shame, and stigmatisation negatively impacted treatment seeking behaviours with most avoiding current quit services. Costs of pharmacotherapy and treatment adherence were commonly cited barriers to treatment success. Electronic-cigarettes were perceived to be unsafe due to uncertainty on their legal status and regulatory restrictions. Technology-based text-messaging quit support was endorsed as a more favourable alternative compared to existing behavioural treatment services. CONCLUSION: Stigmatisation was commonly endorsed and acted as an impediment to current treatment utilisation. Electronic-cigarettes may present a viable harm reduction alternative, but their likely uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in Australia is limited by smokers’ uncertainty about their regulation and legality. Mobile phone based cessation support may provide an alternative to telephone counselling and overcome the stigmatisation low-SES smokers face while trying to quit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56835752017-11-20 “I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support Boland, Veronica C. Mattick, Richard P. McRobbie, Hayden Siahpush, Mohammad Courtney, Ryan J. Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: The social gradient in smoking rates persist with an overrepresentation of smoking and its associated harms concentrated within lower socioeconomic status (SES) populations. Low-SES smokers are motivated to quit but face multiple barriers when engaging a quit attempt. An understanding of the current treatment service model from the perspectives of treatment-seeking low-SES smokers is needed to inform the design of alternative smoking cessation support services tailored to the needs of low-SES populations. This qualitative study aimed to: i) explore low-SES smokers’ recent quitting experiences; ii) assess factors that impact treatment engagement; and iii) determine the acceptability and feasibility of alternative approaches to smoking cessation. METHOD: Low-SES participants (n = 24) previously enrolled in a smoking cessation RCT participated in either a semi-structured focus group or in-depth telephone interview. Data was obtained and analysed using thematic analysis from October 2015 to June 2016. Analysis was deductive from the interview guide and supplemented inductively. RESULTS: Participants expressed feelings of guilt and shame around their smoking behaviour and experienced stigmatisation for their smoking. Guilt, shame, and stigmatisation negatively impacted treatment seeking behaviours with most avoiding current quit services. Costs of pharmacotherapy and treatment adherence were commonly cited barriers to treatment success. Electronic-cigarettes were perceived to be unsafe due to uncertainty on their legal status and regulatory restrictions. Technology-based text-messaging quit support was endorsed as a more favourable alternative compared to existing behavioural treatment services. CONCLUSION: Stigmatisation was commonly endorsed and acted as an impediment to current treatment utilisation. Electronic-cigarettes may present a viable harm reduction alternative, but their likely uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in Australia is limited by smokers’ uncertainty about their regulation and legality. Mobile phone based cessation support may provide an alternative to telephone counselling and overcome the stigmatisation low-SES smokers face while trying to quit. BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683575/ /pubmed/29132364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0689-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Boland, Veronica C.
Mattick, Richard P.
McRobbie, Hayden
Siahpush, Mohammad
Courtney, Ryan J.
“I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support
title “I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support
title_full “I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support
title_fullStr “I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support
title_full_unstemmed “I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support
title_short “I’m not strong enough; I’m not good enough. I can’t do this, I’m failing”- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support
title_sort “i’m not strong enough; i’m not good enough. i can’t do this, i’m failing”- a qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers’ experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0689-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bolandveronicac imnotstrongenoughimnotgoodenoughicantdothisimfailingaqualitativestudyoflowsocioeconomicstatussmokersexperienceswithaccesssingcessationsupportandtheroleforalternativetechnologybasedsupport
AT mattickrichardp imnotstrongenoughimnotgoodenoughicantdothisimfailingaqualitativestudyoflowsocioeconomicstatussmokersexperienceswithaccesssingcessationsupportandtheroleforalternativetechnologybasedsupport
AT mcrobbiehayden imnotstrongenoughimnotgoodenoughicantdothisimfailingaqualitativestudyoflowsocioeconomicstatussmokersexperienceswithaccesssingcessationsupportandtheroleforalternativetechnologybasedsupport
AT siahpushmohammad imnotstrongenoughimnotgoodenoughicantdothisimfailingaqualitativestudyoflowsocioeconomicstatussmokersexperienceswithaccesssingcessationsupportandtheroleforalternativetechnologybasedsupport
AT courtneyryanj imnotstrongenoughimnotgoodenoughicantdothisimfailingaqualitativestudyoflowsocioeconomicstatussmokersexperienceswithaccesssingcessationsupportandtheroleforalternativetechnologybasedsupport