Cargando…
Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations
BACKGROUND: Few patients recover full hand dexterity after an acquired brain injury such as stroke. Repetitive somatosensory electrical stimulation (SES) is a promising method to promote recovery of hand function. However, studies using SES have largely focused on gross motor function; it remains un...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0323-1 |
_version_ | 1783278316180996096 |
---|---|
author | Tu-Chan, Adelyn P. Natraj, Nikhilesh Godlove, Jason Abrams, Gary Ganguly, Karunesh |
author_facet | Tu-Chan, Adelyn P. Natraj, Nikhilesh Godlove, Jason Abrams, Gary Ganguly, Karunesh |
author_sort | Tu-Chan, Adelyn P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few patients recover full hand dexterity after an acquired brain injury such as stroke. Repetitive somatosensory electrical stimulation (SES) is a promising method to promote recovery of hand function. However, studies using SES have largely focused on gross motor function; it remains unclear if it can modulate distal hand functions such as finger individuation. OBJECTIVE: The specific goal of this study was to monitor the effects of SES on individuation as well as on cortical oscillations measured using EEG, with the additional goal of identifying neurophysiological biomarkers. METHODS: Eight participants with a history of acquired brain injury and distal upper limb motor impairments received a single two-hour session of SES using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Pre- and post-intervention assessments consisted of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), finger fractionation, pinch force, and the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), along with resting-state EEG monitoring. RESULTS: SES was associated with significant improvements in ARAT, MAS and finger fractionation. Moreover, SES was associated with a decrease in low frequency (0.9-4 Hz delta) ipsilesional parietomotor EEG power. Interestingly, changes in ipsilesional motor theta (4.8–7.9 Hz) and alpha (8.8–11.7 Hz) power were significantly correlated with finger fractionation improvements when using a multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: We show the positive effects of SES on finger individuation and identify cortical oscillations that may be important electrophysiological biomarkers of individual responsiveness to SES. These biomarkers can be potential targets when customizing SES parameters to individuals with hand dexterity deficits. Trial registration: NCT03176550; retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12984-017-0323-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5683582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56835822017-11-20 Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations Tu-Chan, Adelyn P. Natraj, Nikhilesh Godlove, Jason Abrams, Gary Ganguly, Karunesh J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Few patients recover full hand dexterity after an acquired brain injury such as stroke. Repetitive somatosensory electrical stimulation (SES) is a promising method to promote recovery of hand function. However, studies using SES have largely focused on gross motor function; it remains unclear if it can modulate distal hand functions such as finger individuation. OBJECTIVE: The specific goal of this study was to monitor the effects of SES on individuation as well as on cortical oscillations measured using EEG, with the additional goal of identifying neurophysiological biomarkers. METHODS: Eight participants with a history of acquired brain injury and distal upper limb motor impairments received a single two-hour session of SES using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Pre- and post-intervention assessments consisted of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), finger fractionation, pinch force, and the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), along with resting-state EEG monitoring. RESULTS: SES was associated with significant improvements in ARAT, MAS and finger fractionation. Moreover, SES was associated with a decrease in low frequency (0.9-4 Hz delta) ipsilesional parietomotor EEG power. Interestingly, changes in ipsilesional motor theta (4.8–7.9 Hz) and alpha (8.8–11.7 Hz) power were significantly correlated with finger fractionation improvements when using a multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: We show the positive effects of SES on finger individuation and identify cortical oscillations that may be important electrophysiological biomarkers of individual responsiveness to SES. These biomarkers can be potential targets when customizing SES parameters to individuals with hand dexterity deficits. Trial registration: NCT03176550; retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12984-017-0323-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5683582/ /pubmed/29132379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0323-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tu-Chan, Adelyn P. Natraj, Nikhilesh Godlove, Jason Abrams, Gary Ganguly, Karunesh Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations |
title | Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations |
title_full | Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations |
title_fullStr | Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations |
title_short | Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations |
title_sort | effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor function and cortical oscillations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0323-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuchanadelynp effectsofsomatosensoryelectricalstimulationonmotorfunctionandcorticaloscillations AT natrajnikhilesh effectsofsomatosensoryelectricalstimulationonmotorfunctionandcorticaloscillations AT godlovejason effectsofsomatosensoryelectricalstimulationonmotorfunctionandcorticaloscillations AT abramsgary effectsofsomatosensoryelectricalstimulationonmotorfunctionandcorticaloscillations AT gangulykarunesh effectsofsomatosensoryelectricalstimulationonmotorfunctionandcorticaloscillations |