Cargando…
Comparison of 3 mm versus 4 mm rigid endoscope in diagnostic nasal endoscopy()
OBJECTIVE: Compare nasal endoscopy with 3 mm versus conventional 4 mm rigid 30° endoscopes for visualization, patient comfort, and examiner ease. METHODS: Ten adults with no previous sinus surgery underwent bilateral nasal endoscopy with both 4 mm and 3 mm endoscopes (resulting in 20 paired nasal en...
Autores principales: | Neel, Gregory S., Kau, Ryan L., Bansberg, Stephen F., Lal, Devyani |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
KeAi Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.02.006 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Primary endoscopic stapedotomy using 3 mm nasal endoscope: Audiologic and clinical outcomes
por: Pradhan, Pradeep, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Versatility and Benefits of 4.0mm Flexible Nasal Endoscopy in 118 Children up to 10 Years of Age
por: Narang, Ved P, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic 3 mm and 5 mm cup biopsies to wedge biopsies of canine livers
por: Kimbrell, Tiffany L., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK
por: Moshirfar, Majid, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study
por: Yu, Tong, et al.
Publicado: (2021)