Cargando…

Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET

PURPOSE: The clinical utility of FDG-PET in diagnosing frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has been well demonstrated over the past decades. On the contrary, the diagnostic value of arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI – a relatively new technique – in clinical diagnosis of FTD has yet to be confirmed. Using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anazodo, Udunna C., Finger, Elizabeth, Kwan, Benjamin Yin Ming, Pavlosky, William, Warrington, James Claude, Günther, Matthias, Prato, Frank S., Thiessen, Jonathan D., St. Lawrence, Keith S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29159053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.033
_version_ 1783278361271861248
author Anazodo, Udunna C.
Finger, Elizabeth
Kwan, Benjamin Yin Ming
Pavlosky, William
Warrington, James Claude
Günther, Matthias
Prato, Frank S.
Thiessen, Jonathan D.
St. Lawrence, Keith S.
author_facet Anazodo, Udunna C.
Finger, Elizabeth
Kwan, Benjamin Yin Ming
Pavlosky, William
Warrington, James Claude
Günther, Matthias
Prato, Frank S.
Thiessen, Jonathan D.
St. Lawrence, Keith S.
author_sort Anazodo, Udunna C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The clinical utility of FDG-PET in diagnosing frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has been well demonstrated over the past decades. On the contrary, the diagnostic value of arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI – a relatively new technique – in clinical diagnosis of FTD has yet to be confirmed. Using simultaneous PET/MRI, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of ASL in identifying pathological abnormalities in FTD (FTD) to determine whether ASL can provide similar diagnostic value as FDG-PET. METHODS: ASL and FDG-PET images were compared in 10 patients with FTD and 10 healthy older adults. Qualitative and quantitative measures of diagnostic equivalency were used to determine the diagnostic utility of ASL compared to FDG-PET. Sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability were calculated for each modality from scores of subjective visual ratings and from analysis of regional mean values in thirteen a priori regions of interest (ROI). To determine the extent of concordance between modalities in each patient, individual statistical maps generated from comparison of each patient to controls were compared between modalities using the Jaccard similarity index (JI). RESULTS: Visual assessments revealed lower sensitivity, specificity and inter-rater reliability for ASL (66.67%/62.12%/0.2) compared to FDG-PET (88.43%/90.91%/0.61). Across all regions, ASL performed lower than FDG-PET in discriminating patients from controls (areas under the receiver operating curve: ASL = 0.75 and FDG-PET = 0.87). In all patients, ASL identified patterns of reduced perfusion consistent with FTD, but areas of hypometabolism exceeded hypoperfused areas (group-mean JI = 0.30 ± 0.22). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated that ASL can detect similar spatial patterns of abnormalities in individual FTD patients compared to FDG-PET, but its sensitivity and specificity for discriminant diagnosis of a patient from healthy individuals remained unmatched to FDG-PET. Further studies at the individual level are required to confirm the clinical role of ASL in FTD management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5683801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56838012017-11-20 Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET Anazodo, Udunna C. Finger, Elizabeth Kwan, Benjamin Yin Ming Pavlosky, William Warrington, James Claude Günther, Matthias Prato, Frank S. Thiessen, Jonathan D. St. Lawrence, Keith S. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article PURPOSE: The clinical utility of FDG-PET in diagnosing frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has been well demonstrated over the past decades. On the contrary, the diagnostic value of arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI – a relatively new technique – in clinical diagnosis of FTD has yet to be confirmed. Using simultaneous PET/MRI, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of ASL in identifying pathological abnormalities in FTD (FTD) to determine whether ASL can provide similar diagnostic value as FDG-PET. METHODS: ASL and FDG-PET images were compared in 10 patients with FTD and 10 healthy older adults. Qualitative and quantitative measures of diagnostic equivalency were used to determine the diagnostic utility of ASL compared to FDG-PET. Sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability were calculated for each modality from scores of subjective visual ratings and from analysis of regional mean values in thirteen a priori regions of interest (ROI). To determine the extent of concordance between modalities in each patient, individual statistical maps generated from comparison of each patient to controls were compared between modalities using the Jaccard similarity index (JI). RESULTS: Visual assessments revealed lower sensitivity, specificity and inter-rater reliability for ASL (66.67%/62.12%/0.2) compared to FDG-PET (88.43%/90.91%/0.61). Across all regions, ASL performed lower than FDG-PET in discriminating patients from controls (areas under the receiver operating curve: ASL = 0.75 and FDG-PET = 0.87). In all patients, ASL identified patterns of reduced perfusion consistent with FTD, but areas of hypometabolism exceeded hypoperfused areas (group-mean JI = 0.30 ± 0.22). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated that ASL can detect similar spatial patterns of abnormalities in individual FTD patients compared to FDG-PET, but its sensitivity and specificity for discriminant diagnosis of a patient from healthy individuals remained unmatched to FDG-PET. Further studies at the individual level are required to confirm the clinical role of ASL in FTD management. Elsevier 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5683801/ /pubmed/29159053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.033 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Anazodo, Udunna C.
Finger, Elizabeth
Kwan, Benjamin Yin Ming
Pavlosky, William
Warrington, James Claude
Günther, Matthias
Prato, Frank S.
Thiessen, Jonathan D.
St. Lawrence, Keith S.
Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET
title Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET
title_full Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET
title_fullStr Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET
title_full_unstemmed Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET
title_short Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET
title_sort using simultaneous pet/mri to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling mri and fdg-pet
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29159053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.033
work_keys_str_mv AT anazodoudunnac usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT fingerelizabeth usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT kwanbenjaminyinming usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT pavloskywilliam usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT warringtonjamesclaude usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT gunthermatthias usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT pratofranks usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT thiessenjonathand usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet
AT stlawrencekeiths usingsimultaneouspetmritocomparetheaccuracyofdiagnosingfrontotemporaldementiabyarterialspinlabellingmriandfdgpet