Cargando…

Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network

BACKGROUND: There is a need for data on the clinical safety of anthroposophic medicinal products (AMPs). OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this analysis was to determine the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to AMPs, relative to the number of AMP prescriptions. METHODS: EvaMed (Evaluation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamre, Harald Johan, Glockmann, Anja, Heckenbach, Kirsten, Matthes, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0118-5
_version_ 1783278394453000192
author Hamre, Harald Johan
Glockmann, Anja
Heckenbach, Kirsten
Matthes, Harald
author_facet Hamre, Harald Johan
Glockmann, Anja
Heckenbach, Kirsten
Matthes, Harald
author_sort Hamre, Harald Johan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for data on the clinical safety of anthroposophic medicinal products (AMPs). OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this analysis was to determine the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to AMPs, relative to the number of AMP prescriptions. METHODS: EvaMed (Evaluation of Anthroposophic Medicine) was a prospective pharmacovigilance study with the patients of 38 physicians in outpatient care in Germany. Diagnoses and prescriptions were extracted from the electronic medical records. All physicians documented ADRs of Grades III–IV and serious ADRs, seven ‘prescriber physicians’ also documented non-serious ADRs of any intensity. Patients were eligible for this analysis if they had one or more AMP prescription in the years 2001–2010, followed by one or more physician visit. RESULTS: A total of 44,662 patients with 311,731 AMP prescriptions, comprising 1722 different AMPs, were included. One hundred ADRs to AMPs occurred, caused by 83 different AMPs. ADR intensity was mild, moderate, and severe in 50% (n = 50/100), 43%, and 7% of cases, respectively; one ADR was serious. Among patients of prescriber physicians, ADRs of any intensity occurred in 0.071% (n = 67/94,734) of AMP prescriptions and in 0.502% (n = 65/12,956) of patients prescribed AMPs. In subgroup analyses according to age, specific AMPs or AMP groups, dosage forms, and concentrations (altogether 11 groups), the highest ADR frequency was 0.290% of prescriptions (for one specific AMP). Among all patients, serious ADRs occurred in 0.0003% (n = 1/311,731) of prescriptions and 0.0022% (n = 1/44,662) of patients. CONCLUSION: In this analysis from a large sample, ADRs to AMP therapy in outpatient care were rare; ADRs of high intensity as well as serious ADRs were very rare. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-017-0118-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5684047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56840472017-11-27 Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network Hamre, Harald Johan Glockmann, Anja Heckenbach, Kirsten Matthes, Harald Drugs Real World Outcomes Original Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a need for data on the clinical safety of anthroposophic medicinal products (AMPs). OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this analysis was to determine the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to AMPs, relative to the number of AMP prescriptions. METHODS: EvaMed (Evaluation of Anthroposophic Medicine) was a prospective pharmacovigilance study with the patients of 38 physicians in outpatient care in Germany. Diagnoses and prescriptions were extracted from the electronic medical records. All physicians documented ADRs of Grades III–IV and serious ADRs, seven ‘prescriber physicians’ also documented non-serious ADRs of any intensity. Patients were eligible for this analysis if they had one or more AMP prescription in the years 2001–2010, followed by one or more physician visit. RESULTS: A total of 44,662 patients with 311,731 AMP prescriptions, comprising 1722 different AMPs, were included. One hundred ADRs to AMPs occurred, caused by 83 different AMPs. ADR intensity was mild, moderate, and severe in 50% (n = 50/100), 43%, and 7% of cases, respectively; one ADR was serious. Among patients of prescriber physicians, ADRs of any intensity occurred in 0.071% (n = 67/94,734) of AMP prescriptions and in 0.502% (n = 65/12,956) of patients prescribed AMPs. In subgroup analyses according to age, specific AMPs or AMP groups, dosage forms, and concentrations (altogether 11 groups), the highest ADR frequency was 0.290% of prescriptions (for one specific AMP). Among all patients, serious ADRs occurred in 0.0003% (n = 1/311,731) of prescriptions and 0.0022% (n = 1/44,662) of patients. CONCLUSION: In this analysis from a large sample, ADRs to AMP therapy in outpatient care were rare; ADRs of high intensity as well as serious ADRs were very rare. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-017-0118-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5684047/ /pubmed/28965336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0118-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hamre, Harald Johan
Glockmann, Anja
Heckenbach, Kirsten
Matthes, Harald
Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network
title Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network
title_full Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network
title_fullStr Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network
title_full_unstemmed Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network
title_short Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network
title_sort use and safety of anthroposophic medicinal products: an analysis of 44,662 patients from the evamed pharmacovigilance network
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0118-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hamreharaldjohan useandsafetyofanthroposophicmedicinalproductsananalysisof44662patientsfromtheevamedpharmacovigilancenetwork
AT glockmannanja useandsafetyofanthroposophicmedicinalproductsananalysisof44662patientsfromtheevamedpharmacovigilancenetwork
AT heckenbachkirsten useandsafetyofanthroposophicmedicinalproductsananalysisof44662patientsfromtheevamedpharmacovigilancenetwork
AT matthesharald useandsafetyofanthroposophicmedicinalproductsananalysisof44662patientsfromtheevamedpharmacovigilancenetwork