Cargando…

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). The outcomes were compared in 139 patients (103 upper and 36 lower abdominal surgeries) with PAS and 361 without PAS who underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yong, Feng, Qian, Wang, Kai, Xiong, Xiaoli, Zou, Shubing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15782-y
_version_ 1783278407827587072
author Huang, Yong
Feng, Qian
Wang, Kai
Xiong, Xiaoli
Zou, Shubing
author_facet Huang, Yong
Feng, Qian
Wang, Kai
Xiong, Xiaoli
Zou, Shubing
author_sort Huang, Yong
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). The outcomes were compared in 139 patients (103 upper and 36 lower abdominal surgeries) with PAS and 361 without PAS who underwent LCBDE. The operative time, hospital stay, rate of open conversion, postoperative complications, duct clearance, and blood loss were compared. Patients with PAS had longer operative times (P = 0.006), higher hospital costs (P = 0.043), and a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.011) than those without PAS. However, there were no statistically significant in the open conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, bile leakage, biliary strictures, residual stones, and mortality between patients with and without PAS (P > 0.05). Moreover, compared with those without PAS, patients with previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) had longer operative times (P = 0.005), higher hospital costs (P = 0.030), and a higher open conversion rate (P = 0.043), but patients with previous lower abdominal surgery (PLAS) had a higher incidence of wound complications (P  = 0.022). LCBDE is considered safe and feasible for patients with PAS, including those with PUAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5684132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56841322017-11-29 The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery Huang, Yong Feng, Qian Wang, Kai Xiong, Xiaoli Zou, Shubing Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). The outcomes were compared in 139 patients (103 upper and 36 lower abdominal surgeries) with PAS and 361 without PAS who underwent LCBDE. The operative time, hospital stay, rate of open conversion, postoperative complications, duct clearance, and blood loss were compared. Patients with PAS had longer operative times (P = 0.006), higher hospital costs (P = 0.043), and a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.011) than those without PAS. However, there were no statistically significant in the open conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, bile leakage, biliary strictures, residual stones, and mortality between patients with and without PAS (P > 0.05). Moreover, compared with those without PAS, patients with previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) had longer operative times (P = 0.005), higher hospital costs (P = 0.030), and a higher open conversion rate (P = 0.043), but patients with previous lower abdominal surgery (PLAS) had a higher incidence of wound complications (P  = 0.022). LCBDE is considered safe and feasible for patients with PAS, including those with PUAS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5684132/ /pubmed/29133895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15782-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Yong
Feng, Qian
Wang, Kai
Xiong, Xiaoli
Zou, Shubing
The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
title The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
title_full The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
title_fullStr The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
title_full_unstemmed The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
title_short The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
title_sort safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15782-y
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyong thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT fengqian thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT wangkai thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT xiongxiaoli thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT zoushubing thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT huangyong safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT fengqian safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT wangkai safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT xiongxiaoli safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery
AT zoushubing safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery