Cargando…
The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). The outcomes were compared in 139 patients (103 upper and 36 lower abdominal surgeries) with PAS and 361 without PAS who underw...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15782-y |
_version_ | 1783278407827587072 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yong Feng, Qian Wang, Kai Xiong, Xiaoli Zou, Shubing |
author_facet | Huang, Yong Feng, Qian Wang, Kai Xiong, Xiaoli Zou, Shubing |
author_sort | Huang, Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). The outcomes were compared in 139 patients (103 upper and 36 lower abdominal surgeries) with PAS and 361 without PAS who underwent LCBDE. The operative time, hospital stay, rate of open conversion, postoperative complications, duct clearance, and blood loss were compared. Patients with PAS had longer operative times (P = 0.006), higher hospital costs (P = 0.043), and a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.011) than those without PAS. However, there were no statistically significant in the open conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, bile leakage, biliary strictures, residual stones, and mortality between patients with and without PAS (P > 0.05). Moreover, compared with those without PAS, patients with previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) had longer operative times (P = 0.005), higher hospital costs (P = 0.030), and a higher open conversion rate (P = 0.043), but patients with previous lower abdominal surgery (PLAS) had a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.022). LCBDE is considered safe and feasible for patients with PAS, including those with PUAS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5684132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56841322017-11-29 The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery Huang, Yong Feng, Qian Wang, Kai Xiong, Xiaoli Zou, Shubing Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). The outcomes were compared in 139 patients (103 upper and 36 lower abdominal surgeries) with PAS and 361 without PAS who underwent LCBDE. The operative time, hospital stay, rate of open conversion, postoperative complications, duct clearance, and blood loss were compared. Patients with PAS had longer operative times (P = 0.006), higher hospital costs (P = 0.043), and a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.011) than those without PAS. However, there were no statistically significant in the open conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, bile leakage, biliary strictures, residual stones, and mortality between patients with and without PAS (P > 0.05). Moreover, compared with those without PAS, patients with previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) had longer operative times (P = 0.005), higher hospital costs (P = 0.030), and a higher open conversion rate (P = 0.043), but patients with previous lower abdominal surgery (PLAS) had a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.022). LCBDE is considered safe and feasible for patients with PAS, including those with PUAS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5684132/ /pubmed/29133895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15782-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Huang, Yong Feng, Qian Wang, Kai Xiong, Xiaoli Zou, Shubing The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery |
title | The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery |
title_full | The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery |
title_fullStr | The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery |
title_short | The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery |
title_sort | safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15782-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyong thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT fengqian thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT wangkai thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT xiongxiaoli thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT zoushubing thesafetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT huangyong safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT fengqian safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT wangkai safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT xiongxiaoli safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery AT zoushubing safetyandfeasibilityoflaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationfortreatmentpatientswithpreviousabdominalsurgery |