Cargando…

Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the M4 (porous polyethylene plate) Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) drainage implant in a multicenter retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of medical records of patients who had undergone the M4 Ahmed valve was performed from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sluch, Ilya, Gudgel, Brett, Dvorak, Justin, Anne Ahluwalia, Mary, Ding, Kai, Vold, Steve, Sarkisian, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151683
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1231
_version_ 1783278433432764416
author Sluch, Ilya
Gudgel, Brett
Dvorak, Justin
Anne Ahluwalia, Mary
Ding, Kai
Vold, Steve
Sarkisian, Steven
author_facet Sluch, Ilya
Gudgel, Brett
Dvorak, Justin
Anne Ahluwalia, Mary
Ding, Kai
Vold, Steve
Sarkisian, Steven
author_sort Sluch, Ilya
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the M4 (porous polyethylene plate) Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) drainage implant in a multicenter retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of medical records of patients who had undergone the M4 Ahmed valve was performed from January 2013 to April 2015. The primary outcome measure was surgical failure defined as: Less than a 20% reduction in baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) to last follow-up visit, final IOP less than 5 mm Hg or greater than 18 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision. All eyes not meeting the above criteria were defined as success. RESULTS: A total of 291 eyes met all study inclusion criteria. The average follow-up in the study was 6 months (±7.6 months) with 112 patients achieving 12-month follow-up (38.5%). 208 eyes (71.5%) met the study success criteria at final follow-up. No statistically significant spikes in postoperative IOP at 1 and 4 months were detected. The average preoperative IOP was 26.0 on an average of 2.8 medications. At 6 months, the average IOP dropped to 16.7 on 0.9 medications and stayed relatively stable at 15.8 on 1.2 medications at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The M4 valve appears to have less of a hypertensive phase compared with the other Ahmed class valves with a similar safety profile. While 71.5% success rate was achieved at final follow-up, the failure rate steadily increased over time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While the M4 production has been discontinued, the porous design of the M4 may avoid a pressure spike in the Ahmed valve class and warrants future investigation for valve design. How to cite this article: Sluch I, Gudgel B, Dvorak J, Ahluwalia MA, Ding K, Vold S, Sarkisian S. Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2017;11(3):92-96.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5684239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56842392017-11-17 Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant Sluch, Ilya Gudgel, Brett Dvorak, Justin Anne Ahluwalia, Mary Ding, Kai Vold, Steve Sarkisian, Steven J Curr Glaucoma Pract Original Article AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the M4 (porous polyethylene plate) Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) drainage implant in a multicenter retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of medical records of patients who had undergone the M4 Ahmed valve was performed from January 2013 to April 2015. The primary outcome measure was surgical failure defined as: Less than a 20% reduction in baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) to last follow-up visit, final IOP less than 5 mm Hg or greater than 18 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision. All eyes not meeting the above criteria were defined as success. RESULTS: A total of 291 eyes met all study inclusion criteria. The average follow-up in the study was 6 months (±7.6 months) with 112 patients achieving 12-month follow-up (38.5%). 208 eyes (71.5%) met the study success criteria at final follow-up. No statistically significant spikes in postoperative IOP at 1 and 4 months were detected. The average preoperative IOP was 26.0 on an average of 2.8 medications. At 6 months, the average IOP dropped to 16.7 on 0.9 medications and stayed relatively stable at 15.8 on 1.2 medications at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The M4 valve appears to have less of a hypertensive phase compared with the other Ahmed class valves with a similar safety profile. While 71.5% success rate was achieved at final follow-up, the failure rate steadily increased over time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While the M4 production has been discontinued, the porous design of the M4 may avoid a pressure spike in the Ahmed valve class and warrants future investigation for valve design. How to cite this article: Sluch I, Gudgel B, Dvorak J, Ahluwalia MA, Ding K, Vold S, Sarkisian S. Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2017;11(3):92-96. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5684239/ /pubmed/29151683 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1231 Text en Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Sluch, Ilya
Gudgel, Brett
Dvorak, Justin
Anne Ahluwalia, Mary
Ding, Kai
Vold, Steve
Sarkisian, Steven
Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant
title Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant
title_full Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant
title_fullStr Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant
title_short Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant
title_sort clinical experience with the m4 ahmed glaucoma drainage implant
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151683
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1231
work_keys_str_mv AT sluchilya clinicalexperiencewiththem4ahmedglaucomadrainageimplant
AT gudgelbrett clinicalexperiencewiththem4ahmedglaucomadrainageimplant
AT dvorakjustin clinicalexperiencewiththem4ahmedglaucomadrainageimplant
AT anneahluwaliamary clinicalexperiencewiththem4ahmedglaucomadrainageimplant
AT dingkai clinicalexperiencewiththem4ahmedglaucomadrainageimplant
AT voldsteve clinicalexperiencewiththem4ahmedglaucomadrainageimplant
AT sarkisiansteven clinicalexperiencewiththem4ahmedglaucomadrainageimplant