Cargando…

Economic Evaluation of Implementing a Novel Pharmacogenomic Test (IDgenetix(®)) to Guide Treatment of Patients with Depression and/or Anxiety

BACKGROUND: The response to therapeutics varies widely in patients with depression and anxiety, making selection of an optimal treatment choice challenging. IDgenetix(®), a novel pharmacogenomic test, has been shown to improve outcomes by predicting the likelihood of response to different psychother...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najafzadeh, Mehdi, Garces, Jorge A., Maciel, Alejandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0587-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The response to therapeutics varies widely in patients with depression and anxiety, making selection of an optimal treatment choice challenging. IDgenetix(®), a novel pharmacogenomic test, has been shown to improve outcomes by predicting the likelihood of response to different psychotherapeutic medications. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of implementing a novel pharmacogenomic test (IDgenetix(®)) to guide treatment choices in patients with depression and/or anxiety compared with treatment as usual from the US societal perspective. METHODS: We developed a discrete event simulation to compare clinical events, quality-adjusted life-years, and costs of the two treatment strategies. Target patients had a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Score ≥ 20 and/or a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score ≥ 18 at baseline. Remission, response, and no response were simulated based on the observed rates in the IDgenetix(®) randomized controlled trial. Quality-adjusted life-years and direct and indirect costs attributable to depression and anxiety were estimated and compared over a 3-year time horizon. We conducted extensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: The model predicted cumulative remission rates of 78 and 66% in IDgenetix(®) and treatment as usual groups, respectively. Estimated discounted quality-adjusted life-years were 2.09 and 1.94 per patient for IDgenetix(®) and treatment as usual, respectively, which resulted in 0.15 incremental quality-adjusted life-years (95% credible interval 0.04–0.28). The total costs after accounting for a US$2000 test cost were US$14,124 for IDgenetix(®) compared with US$14,659 for treatment as usual, suggesting a US$535 (95% credible interval − 2902 to 1692) cost saving per patient in the IDgenetix(®) group. Incremental quality-adjusted life-year gain (0.49) and cost savings (US$6800) were substantially larger in patients with severe depression (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score ≥ 25). CONCLUSION: Using the IDgenetix(®) test to guide the treatment of patients with depression and anxiety may be a dominant strategy, as it improves quality-adjusted life-years and decreases overall costs over a 3-year time horizon. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-017-0587-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.