Cargando…
Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of death since ancient time documented in Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy imaging. PCa detection is critical to personalized medicine and varies considerably under an MRI scan. 172 patients with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15720-y |
_version_ | 1783278476025921536 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xinggang Yang, Wei Weinreb, Jeffrey Han, Juan Li, Qiubai Kong, Xiangchuang Yan, Yongluan Ke, Zan Luo, Bo Liu, Tao Wang, Liang |
author_facet | Wang, Xinggang Yang, Wei Weinreb, Jeffrey Han, Juan Li, Qiubai Kong, Xiangchuang Yan, Yongluan Ke, Zan Luo, Bo Liu, Tao Wang, Liang |
author_sort | Wang, Xinggang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of death since ancient time documented in Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy imaging. PCa detection is critical to personalized medicine and varies considerably under an MRI scan. 172 patients with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate were obtained. A deep learning with deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and a non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and bag-of-word (BoW), a representative method for image recognition and analysis, were used to distinguish pathologically confirmed PCa patients from prostate benign conditions (BCs) patients with prostatitis or prostate benign hyperplasia (BPH). In fully automated detection of PCa patients, deep learning had a statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) than non-deep learning (P = 0.0007 < 0.001). The AUCs were 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.89) for deep learning method and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.77) for non-deep learning method, respectively. Our results suggest that deep learning with DCNN is superior to non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and BoW model for fully automated PCa patients differentiation from prostate BCs patients. Our deep learning method is extensible to image modalities such as MR imaging, CT and PET of other organs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5684419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56844192017-11-29 Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning Wang, Xinggang Yang, Wei Weinreb, Jeffrey Han, Juan Li, Qiubai Kong, Xiangchuang Yan, Yongluan Ke, Zan Luo, Bo Liu, Tao Wang, Liang Sci Rep Article Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of death since ancient time documented in Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy imaging. PCa detection is critical to personalized medicine and varies considerably under an MRI scan. 172 patients with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate were obtained. A deep learning with deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and a non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and bag-of-word (BoW), a representative method for image recognition and analysis, were used to distinguish pathologically confirmed PCa patients from prostate benign conditions (BCs) patients with prostatitis or prostate benign hyperplasia (BPH). In fully automated detection of PCa patients, deep learning had a statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) than non-deep learning (P = 0.0007 < 0.001). The AUCs were 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.89) for deep learning method and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.77) for non-deep learning method, respectively. Our results suggest that deep learning with DCNN is superior to non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and BoW model for fully automated PCa patients differentiation from prostate BCs patients. Our deep learning method is extensible to image modalities such as MR imaging, CT and PET of other organs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5684419/ /pubmed/29133818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15720-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Xinggang Yang, Wei Weinreb, Jeffrey Han, Juan Li, Qiubai Kong, Xiangchuang Yan, Yongluan Ke, Zan Luo, Bo Liu, Tao Wang, Liang Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning |
title | Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning |
title_full | Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning |
title_fullStr | Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning |
title_short | Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning |
title_sort | searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15720-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxinggang searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT yangwei searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT weinrebjeffrey searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT hanjuan searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT liqiubai searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT kongxiangchuang searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT yanyongluan searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT kezan searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT luobo searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT liutao searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning AT wangliang searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning |