Cargando…

Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of death since ancient time documented in Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy imaging. PCa detection is critical to personalized medicine and varies considerably under an MRI scan. 172 patients with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xinggang, Yang, Wei, Weinreb, Jeffrey, Han, Juan, Li, Qiubai, Kong, Xiangchuang, Yan, Yongluan, Ke, Zan, Luo, Bo, Liu, Tao, Wang, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15720-y
_version_ 1783278476025921536
author Wang, Xinggang
Yang, Wei
Weinreb, Jeffrey
Han, Juan
Li, Qiubai
Kong, Xiangchuang
Yan, Yongluan
Ke, Zan
Luo, Bo
Liu, Tao
Wang, Liang
author_facet Wang, Xinggang
Yang, Wei
Weinreb, Jeffrey
Han, Juan
Li, Qiubai
Kong, Xiangchuang
Yan, Yongluan
Ke, Zan
Luo, Bo
Liu, Tao
Wang, Liang
author_sort Wang, Xinggang
collection PubMed
description Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of death since ancient time documented in Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy imaging. PCa detection is critical to personalized medicine and varies considerably under an MRI scan. 172 patients with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate were obtained. A deep learning with deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and a non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and bag-of-word (BoW), a representative method for image recognition and analysis, were used to distinguish pathologically confirmed PCa patients from prostate benign conditions (BCs) patients with prostatitis or prostate benign hyperplasia (BPH). In fully automated detection of PCa patients, deep learning had a statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) than non-deep learning (P = 0.0007 < 0.001). The AUCs were 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.89) for deep learning method and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.77) for non-deep learning method, respectively. Our results suggest that deep learning with DCNN is superior to non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and BoW model for fully automated PCa patients differentiation from prostate BCs patients. Our deep learning method is extensible to image modalities such as MR imaging, CT and PET of other organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5684419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56844192017-11-29 Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning Wang, Xinggang Yang, Wei Weinreb, Jeffrey Han, Juan Li, Qiubai Kong, Xiangchuang Yan, Yongluan Ke, Zan Luo, Bo Liu, Tao Wang, Liang Sci Rep Article Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of death since ancient time documented in Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy imaging. PCa detection is critical to personalized medicine and varies considerably under an MRI scan. 172 patients with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate were obtained. A deep learning with deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and a non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and bag-of-word (BoW), a representative method for image recognition and analysis, were used to distinguish pathologically confirmed PCa patients from prostate benign conditions (BCs) patients with prostatitis or prostate benign hyperplasia (BPH). In fully automated detection of PCa patients, deep learning had a statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) than non-deep learning (P = 0.0007 < 0.001). The AUCs were 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.89) for deep learning method and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.77) for non-deep learning method, respectively. Our results suggest that deep learning with DCNN is superior to non-deep learning with SIFT image feature and BoW model for fully automated PCa patients differentiation from prostate BCs patients. Our deep learning method is extensible to image modalities such as MR imaging, CT and PET of other organs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5684419/ /pubmed/29133818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15720-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Xinggang
Yang, Wei
Weinreb, Jeffrey
Han, Juan
Li, Qiubai
Kong, Xiangchuang
Yan, Yongluan
Ke, Zan
Luo, Bo
Liu, Tao
Wang, Liang
Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
title Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
title_full Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
title_fullStr Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
title_short Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
title_sort searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15720-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxinggang searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT yangwei searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT weinrebjeffrey searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT hanjuan searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT liqiubai searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT kongxiangchuang searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT yanyongluan searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT kezan searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT luobo searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT liutao searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning
AT wangliang searchingforprostatecancerbyfullyautomatedmagneticresonanceimagingclassificationdeeplearningversusnondeeplearning