Cargando…

Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to answer 5 key questions: What is the comparative effectiveness and safety of (1a) anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis, placebo, or another anticoagulant strategy for preventing deep vein thrombosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnold, Paul M., Harrop, James S., Merli, Geno, Tetreault, Lindsay G., Kwon, Brian K., Casha, Steve, Palmieri, Katherine, Wilson, Jefferson R., Fehlings, Michael G., Holmer, Haley K., Norvell, Daniel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217703665
_version_ 1783278561328627712
author Arnold, Paul M.
Harrop, James S.
Merli, Geno
Tetreault, Lindsay G.
Kwon, Brian K.
Casha, Steve
Palmieri, Katherine
Wilson, Jefferson R.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Holmer, Haley K.
Norvell, Daniel C.
author_facet Arnold, Paul M.
Harrop, James S.
Merli, Geno
Tetreault, Lindsay G.
Kwon, Brian K.
Casha, Steve
Palmieri, Katherine
Wilson, Jefferson R.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Holmer, Haley K.
Norvell, Daniel C.
author_sort Arnold, Paul M.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to answer 5 key questions: What is the comparative effectiveness and safety of (1a) anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis, placebo, or another anticoagulant strategy for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after acute spinal cord injury (SCI)? (1b) Mechanical prophylaxis strategies alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (1c) Prophylactic inferior vena cava filter insertion alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (2) What is the optimal timing to initiate and/or discontinue anticoagulant, mechanical, and/or prophylactic inferior vena cava filter following acute SCI? (3) What is the cost-effectiveness of these treatment options? METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies published through February 28, 2015. We sought randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies. Strength of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria. We found a trend toward lower risk of DVT in patients treated with enoxaparin. There were no significant differences in rates of DVT, PE, bleeding, and mortality between patients treated with different types of low-molecular-weight heparin or between low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin. Combined anticoagulant and mechanical prophylaxis initiated within 72 hours of SCI resulted in lower risk of DVT than treatment commenced after 72 hours of injury. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatments can be used to lower the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with acute SCI, without significant increase in risk of bleeding and mortality and should be initiated within 72 hours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5684847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56848472017-11-21 Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review Arnold, Paul M. Harrop, James S. Merli, Geno Tetreault, Lindsay G. Kwon, Brian K. Casha, Steve Palmieri, Katherine Wilson, Jefferson R. Fehlings, Michael G. Holmer, Haley K. Norvell, Daniel C. Global Spine J Systematic Reviews STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to answer 5 key questions: What is the comparative effectiveness and safety of (1a) anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis, placebo, or another anticoagulant strategy for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after acute spinal cord injury (SCI)? (1b) Mechanical prophylaxis strategies alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (1c) Prophylactic inferior vena cava filter insertion alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (2) What is the optimal timing to initiate and/or discontinue anticoagulant, mechanical, and/or prophylactic inferior vena cava filter following acute SCI? (3) What is the cost-effectiveness of these treatment options? METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies published through February 28, 2015. We sought randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies. Strength of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria. We found a trend toward lower risk of DVT in patients treated with enoxaparin. There were no significant differences in rates of DVT, PE, bleeding, and mortality between patients treated with different types of low-molecular-weight heparin or between low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin. Combined anticoagulant and mechanical prophylaxis initiated within 72 hours of SCI resulted in lower risk of DVT than treatment commenced after 72 hours of injury. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatments can be used to lower the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with acute SCI, without significant increase in risk of bleeding and mortality and should be initiated within 72 hours. SAGE Publications 2017-09-05 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5684847/ /pubmed/29164021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217703665 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Arnold, Paul M.
Harrop, James S.
Merli, Geno
Tetreault, Lindsay G.
Kwon, Brian K.
Casha, Steve
Palmieri, Katherine
Wilson, Jefferson R.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Holmer, Haley K.
Norvell, Daniel C.
Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_full Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_short Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_sort efficacy, safety, and timing of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5684847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217703665
work_keys_str_mv AT arnoldpaulm efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT harropjamess efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT merligeno efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT tetreaultlindsayg efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT kwonbriank efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT cashasteve efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT palmierikatherine efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT wilsonjeffersonr efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT fehlingsmichaelg efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT holmerhaleyk efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT norvelldanielc efficacysafetyandtimingofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisforthepreventionofvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithacutespinalcordinjuryasystematicreview