Cargando…
Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements
BACKGROUND: Poor distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions has attracted criticism since China adopted provincial centralized regional tendering and procurement systems. This study evaluated the impact of new procurement arrangements that limit the number of distributors at th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2720-3 |
_version_ | 1783278843473166336 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Lianping Huang, Cunrui Liu, Chaojie |
author_facet | Yang, Lianping Huang, Cunrui Liu, Chaojie |
author_sort | Yang, Lianping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Poor distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions has attracted criticism since China adopted provincial centralized regional tendering and procurement systems. This study evaluated the impact of new procurement arrangements that limit the number of distributors at the county level in Hubei province, China. METHODS: Procurement ordering and distribution data were collected from four counties that pioneered a new distribution arrangement (commencing September 2012) compared with six counties that continued the existing arrangement over the period from August 2011 to September 2013. The new arrangement allowed primary care institutions and/or suppliers to select a local distributor from a limited panel (from 3 to 5) of government nominated distributors. Difference-in-differences analyses were performed to assess the impact of the new arrangements on delivery and receipt of essential medicines. RESULTS: Overall, the new distribution arrangement has not improved distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions. On the contrary, we found a 7.78–19.85 percentage point (p < 0.01) decrease in distribution rates to rural primary care institutions. Similar results were demonstrated using the indicator of received rates, with a 7.89–19.65 percentage point (p < 0.01) decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Simply limiting the number of distributors does not offer a solution to the poor performance of delivery of essential medicines for primary care institutions, especially those located in rural areas. Procurement arrangements need to consider the special characteristics of rural facilities. In a county, there are more rural primary care institutions than urban ones. On average, rural primary care institutions demand more and are more geographically dispersed compared to their urban counterparts, which may impose increased distribution costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2720-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5686827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56868272017-11-21 Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements Yang, Lianping Huang, Cunrui Liu, Chaojie BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Poor distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions has attracted criticism since China adopted provincial centralized regional tendering and procurement systems. This study evaluated the impact of new procurement arrangements that limit the number of distributors at the county level in Hubei province, China. METHODS: Procurement ordering and distribution data were collected from four counties that pioneered a new distribution arrangement (commencing September 2012) compared with six counties that continued the existing arrangement over the period from August 2011 to September 2013. The new arrangement allowed primary care institutions and/or suppliers to select a local distributor from a limited panel (from 3 to 5) of government nominated distributors. Difference-in-differences analyses were performed to assess the impact of the new arrangements on delivery and receipt of essential medicines. RESULTS: Overall, the new distribution arrangement has not improved distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions. On the contrary, we found a 7.78–19.85 percentage point (p < 0.01) decrease in distribution rates to rural primary care institutions. Similar results were demonstrated using the indicator of received rates, with a 7.89–19.65 percentage point (p < 0.01) decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Simply limiting the number of distributors does not offer a solution to the poor performance of delivery of essential medicines for primary care institutions, especially those located in rural areas. Procurement arrangements need to consider the special characteristics of rural facilities. In a county, there are more rural primary care institutions than urban ones. On average, rural primary care institutions demand more and are more geographically dispersed compared to their urban counterparts, which may impose increased distribution costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2720-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5686827/ /pubmed/29137645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2720-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Lianping Huang, Cunrui Liu, Chaojie Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements |
title | Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements |
title_full | Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements |
title_fullStr | Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements |
title_short | Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements |
title_sort | distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in hubei of china: effects of centralized procurement arrangements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2720-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanglianping distributionofessentialmedicinestoprimarycareinstitutionsinhubeiofchinaeffectsofcentralizedprocurementarrangements AT huangcunrui distributionofessentialmedicinestoprimarycareinstitutionsinhubeiofchinaeffectsofcentralizedprocurementarrangements AT liuchaojie distributionofessentialmedicinestoprimarycareinstitutionsinhubeiofchinaeffectsofcentralizedprocurementarrangements |