Cargando…

Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR) score in patients with early breast cancer and long-term follow-up. A special focus was placed on hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohnstad, Hege O., Borgen, Elin, Falk, Ragnhild S., Lien, Tonje G., Aaserud, Marit, Sveli, My Anh T., Kyte, Jon A., Kristensen, Vessela N., Geitvik, Gry A., Schlichting, Ellen, Wist, Erik A., Sørlie, Therese, Russnes, Hege G., Naume, Bjørn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0911-9
_version_ 1783278847758696448
author Ohnstad, Hege O.
Borgen, Elin
Falk, Ragnhild S.
Lien, Tonje G.
Aaserud, Marit
Sveli, My Anh T.
Kyte, Jon A.
Kristensen, Vessela N.
Geitvik, Gry A.
Schlichting, Ellen
Wist, Erik A.
Sørlie, Therese
Russnes, Hege G.
Naume, Bjørn
author_facet Ohnstad, Hege O.
Borgen, Elin
Falk, Ragnhild S.
Lien, Tonje G.
Aaserud, Marit
Sveli, My Anh T.
Kyte, Jon A.
Kristensen, Vessela N.
Geitvik, Gry A.
Schlichting, Ellen
Wist, Erik A.
Sørlie, Therese
Russnes, Hege G.
Naume, Bjørn
author_sort Ohnstad, Hege O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR) score in patients with early breast cancer and long-term follow-up. A special focus was placed on hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) pN0 patients not treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer (n = 653) enrolled in the observational Oslo1 study (1995–1998) were followed for distant recurrence and breast cancer death. Clinicopathological parameters were collected from hospital records. The primary tumors were analyzed using the Prosigna® PAM50 assay to determine the prognostic value of the intrinsic subtypes and ROR score in comparison with pathological characteristics. The primary endpoints were distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: Of 653 tumors, 52.2% were classified as luminal A, 26.5% as luminal B, 10.6% as HER2-enriched, and 10.7% as basal-like. Among the HR+/HER2− patients (n = 476), 37.8% were categorized as low risk by ROR score, 22.7% as intermediate risk, and 39.5% as high risk. Median follow-up durations for BCSS and DDFS were 16.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that intrinsic subtypes (all patients) and ROR risk classification (HR+/HER2− patients) yielded strong prognostic information. Among the HR+/HER2− pN0 patients with no adjuvant treatment (n = 231), 53.7% of patients had a low ROR, and their prognosis at 15 years was excellent (15-year BCSS 96.3%). Patients with intermediate risk had reduced survival compared with those with low risk (p = 0.005). In contrast, no difference in survival between the low- and intermediate-risk groups was seen for HR+/HER2− pN0 patients who received tamoxifen only. Ki-67 protein, grade, and ROR score were analyzed in the unselected, untreated pT1pN0 HR+/HER2− population (n = 171). In multivariate analysis, ROR score outperformed both Ki-67 and grade. Furthermore, 55% of patients who according to the PREDICT tool (http://www.predict.nhs.uk/) would be considered chemotherapy candidates were ROR low risk (33%) or luminal A ROR intermediate risk (22%). CONCLUSIONS: The PAM50 intrinsic subtype classification and ROR score improve classification of patients with breast cancer into prognostic groups, allowing for a more precise identification of future recurrence risk and providing an improved basis for adjuvant treatment decisions. Node-negative patients with low ROR scores had an excellent outcome at 15 years even in the absence of adjuvant therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0911-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5686844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56868442017-11-21 Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up Ohnstad, Hege O. Borgen, Elin Falk, Ragnhild S. Lien, Tonje G. Aaserud, Marit Sveli, My Anh T. Kyte, Jon A. Kristensen, Vessela N. Geitvik, Gry A. Schlichting, Ellen Wist, Erik A. Sørlie, Therese Russnes, Hege G. Naume, Bjørn Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR) score in patients with early breast cancer and long-term follow-up. A special focus was placed on hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) pN0 patients not treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer (n = 653) enrolled in the observational Oslo1 study (1995–1998) were followed for distant recurrence and breast cancer death. Clinicopathological parameters were collected from hospital records. The primary tumors were analyzed using the Prosigna® PAM50 assay to determine the prognostic value of the intrinsic subtypes and ROR score in comparison with pathological characteristics. The primary endpoints were distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: Of 653 tumors, 52.2% were classified as luminal A, 26.5% as luminal B, 10.6% as HER2-enriched, and 10.7% as basal-like. Among the HR+/HER2− patients (n = 476), 37.8% were categorized as low risk by ROR score, 22.7% as intermediate risk, and 39.5% as high risk. Median follow-up durations for BCSS and DDFS were 16.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that intrinsic subtypes (all patients) and ROR risk classification (HR+/HER2− patients) yielded strong prognostic information. Among the HR+/HER2− pN0 patients with no adjuvant treatment (n = 231), 53.7% of patients had a low ROR, and their prognosis at 15 years was excellent (15-year BCSS 96.3%). Patients with intermediate risk had reduced survival compared with those with low risk (p = 0.005). In contrast, no difference in survival between the low- and intermediate-risk groups was seen for HR+/HER2− pN0 patients who received tamoxifen only. Ki-67 protein, grade, and ROR score were analyzed in the unselected, untreated pT1pN0 HR+/HER2− population (n = 171). In multivariate analysis, ROR score outperformed both Ki-67 and grade. Furthermore, 55% of patients who according to the PREDICT tool (http://www.predict.nhs.uk/) would be considered chemotherapy candidates were ROR low risk (33%) or luminal A ROR intermediate risk (22%). CONCLUSIONS: The PAM50 intrinsic subtype classification and ROR score improve classification of patients with breast cancer into prognostic groups, allowing for a more precise identification of future recurrence risk and providing an improved basis for adjuvant treatment decisions. Node-negative patients with low ROR scores had an excellent outcome at 15 years even in the absence of adjuvant therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0911-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5686844/ /pubmed/29137653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0911-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ohnstad, Hege O.
Borgen, Elin
Falk, Ragnhild S.
Lien, Tonje G.
Aaserud, Marit
Sveli, My Anh T.
Kyte, Jon A.
Kristensen, Vessela N.
Geitvik, Gry A.
Schlichting, Ellen
Wist, Erik A.
Sørlie, Therese
Russnes, Hege G.
Naume, Bjørn
Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up
title Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up
title_full Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up
title_fullStr Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up
title_short Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up
title_sort prognostic value of pam50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0911-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ohnstadhegeo prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT borgenelin prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT falkragnhilds prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT lientonjeg prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT aaserudmarit prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT svelimyanht prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT kytejona prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT kristensenvesselan prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT geitvikgrya prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT schlichtingellen prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT wisterika prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT sørlietherese prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT russneshegeg prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup
AT naumebjørn prognosticvalueofpam50andriskofrecurrencescoreinpatientswithearlystagebreastcancerwithlongtermfollowup