Cargando…
Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe stroke often do not have the capacity to participate in discussions on treatment restrictions because of a reduced level of consciousness, aphasia, or another cognitive disorder. We assessed the role of advance directives and proxy opinions in the decision-making pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8 |
_version_ | 1783278873316687872 |
---|---|
author | de Kort, Floor A. S. Geurts, Marjolein de Kort, Paul L. M. van Tuijl, Julia H. van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W. Kappelle, L. Jaap van der Worp, H. Bart |
author_facet | de Kort, Floor A. S. Geurts, Marjolein de Kort, Paul L. M. van Tuijl, Julia H. van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W. Kappelle, L. Jaap van der Worp, H. Bart |
author_sort | de Kort, Floor A. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with severe stroke often do not have the capacity to participate in discussions on treatment restrictions because of a reduced level of consciousness, aphasia, or another cognitive disorder. We assessed the role of advance directives and proxy opinions in the decision-making process of incapacitated patients. METHODS: Sixty patients with severe functional dependence (Barthel Index ≤6) at day four after ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were included in a prospective two-center cohort study. The decision-making process with respect to treatment restrictions was assessed by means of a semi-structured questionnaire administered to the treating physician at the day of inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (82%) did not have the capacity to participate in the decision-making process. In eight patients, there was no discussion on treatment restrictions and full care was installed. In 41 patients, the decision whether to install treatment restrictions was discussed with proxies. One patient had a written advance directive. In the remaining 40 patients, proxies based their opinion on previously expressed wishes of the patient (18 patients) or advised in the best interest of the patient (22 patients). In 36 of 41 patients, treatment restrictions were installed after agreement between physician and proxy. At six months, 23 of 49 patients had survived. In only three of them the decision on treatment restrictions was based on previously expressed wishes. Remarkably, two of these survivors could not recall any of their alleged previously expressed wishes. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment restrictions were installed in the majority of incapacitated patients after stroke. Proxy opinions frequently served as the best way to respect the patients’ autonomy, but their accuracy remains unclear. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5686946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56869462017-11-21 Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke de Kort, Floor A. S. Geurts, Marjolein de Kort, Paul L. M. van Tuijl, Julia H. van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W. Kappelle, L. Jaap van der Worp, H. Bart BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with severe stroke often do not have the capacity to participate in discussions on treatment restrictions because of a reduced level of consciousness, aphasia, or another cognitive disorder. We assessed the role of advance directives and proxy opinions in the decision-making process of incapacitated patients. METHODS: Sixty patients with severe functional dependence (Barthel Index ≤6) at day four after ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were included in a prospective two-center cohort study. The decision-making process with respect to treatment restrictions was assessed by means of a semi-structured questionnaire administered to the treating physician at the day of inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (82%) did not have the capacity to participate in the decision-making process. In eight patients, there was no discussion on treatment restrictions and full care was installed. In 41 patients, the decision whether to install treatment restrictions was discussed with proxies. One patient had a written advance directive. In the remaining 40 patients, proxies based their opinion on previously expressed wishes of the patient (18 patients) or advised in the best interest of the patient (22 patients). In 36 of 41 patients, treatment restrictions were installed after agreement between physician and proxy. At six months, 23 of 49 patients had survived. In only three of them the decision on treatment restrictions was based on previously expressed wishes. Remarkably, two of these survivors could not recall any of their alleged previously expressed wishes. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment restrictions were installed in the majority of incapacitated patients after stroke. Proxy opinions frequently served as the best way to respect the patients’ autonomy, but their accuracy remains unclear. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5686946/ /pubmed/29137615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Kort, Floor A. S. Geurts, Marjolein de Kort, Paul L. M. van Tuijl, Julia H. van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W. Kappelle, L. Jaap van der Worp, H. Bart Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke |
title | Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke |
title_full | Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke |
title_fullStr | Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke |
title_short | Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke |
title_sort | advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekortflooras advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke AT geurtsmarjolein advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke AT dekortpaullm advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke AT vantuijljuliah advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke AT vanthielghislainejmw advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke AT kappelleljaap advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke AT vanderworphbart advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke |