Cargando…

Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe stroke often do not have the capacity to participate in discussions on treatment restrictions because of a reduced level of consciousness, aphasia, or another cognitive disorder. We assessed the role of advance directives and proxy opinions in the decision-making pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Kort, Floor A. S., Geurts, Marjolein, de Kort, Paul L. M., van Tuijl, Julia H., van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W., Kappelle, L. Jaap, van der Worp, H. Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8
_version_ 1783278873316687872
author de Kort, Floor A. S.
Geurts, Marjolein
de Kort, Paul L. M.
van Tuijl, Julia H.
van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W.
Kappelle, L. Jaap
van der Worp, H. Bart
author_facet de Kort, Floor A. S.
Geurts, Marjolein
de Kort, Paul L. M.
van Tuijl, Julia H.
van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W.
Kappelle, L. Jaap
van der Worp, H. Bart
author_sort de Kort, Floor A. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with severe stroke often do not have the capacity to participate in discussions on treatment restrictions because of a reduced level of consciousness, aphasia, or another cognitive disorder. We assessed the role of advance directives and proxy opinions in the decision-making process of incapacitated patients. METHODS: Sixty patients with severe functional dependence (Barthel Index ≤6) at day four after ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were included in a prospective two-center cohort study. The decision-making process with respect to treatment restrictions was assessed by means of a semi-structured questionnaire administered to the treating physician at the day of inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (82%) did not have the capacity to participate in the decision-making process. In eight patients, there was no discussion on treatment restrictions and full care was installed. In 41 patients, the decision whether to install treatment restrictions was discussed with proxies. One patient had a written advance directive. In the remaining 40 patients, proxies based their opinion on previously expressed wishes of the patient (18 patients) or advised in the best interest of the patient (22 patients). In 36 of 41 patients, treatment restrictions were installed after agreement between physician and proxy. At six months, 23 of 49 patients had survived. In only three of them the decision on treatment restrictions was based on previously expressed wishes. Remarkably, two of these survivors could not recall any of their alleged previously expressed wishes. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment restrictions were installed in the majority of incapacitated patients after stroke. Proxy opinions frequently served as the best way to respect the patients’ autonomy, but their accuracy remains unclear. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5686946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56869462017-11-21 Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke de Kort, Floor A. S. Geurts, Marjolein de Kort, Paul L. M. van Tuijl, Julia H. van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W. Kappelle, L. Jaap van der Worp, H. Bart BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with severe stroke often do not have the capacity to participate in discussions on treatment restrictions because of a reduced level of consciousness, aphasia, or another cognitive disorder. We assessed the role of advance directives and proxy opinions in the decision-making process of incapacitated patients. METHODS: Sixty patients with severe functional dependence (Barthel Index ≤6) at day four after ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were included in a prospective two-center cohort study. The decision-making process with respect to treatment restrictions was assessed by means of a semi-structured questionnaire administered to the treating physician at the day of inclusion. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (82%) did not have the capacity to participate in the decision-making process. In eight patients, there was no discussion on treatment restrictions and full care was installed. In 41 patients, the decision whether to install treatment restrictions was discussed with proxies. One patient had a written advance directive. In the remaining 40 patients, proxies based their opinion on previously expressed wishes of the patient (18 patients) or advised in the best interest of the patient (22 patients). In 36 of 41 patients, treatment restrictions were installed after agreement between physician and proxy. At six months, 23 of 49 patients had survived. In only three of them the decision on treatment restrictions was based on previously expressed wishes. Remarkably, two of these survivors could not recall any of their alleged previously expressed wishes. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment restrictions were installed in the majority of incapacitated patients after stroke. Proxy opinions frequently served as the best way to respect the patients’ autonomy, but their accuracy remains unclear. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5686946/ /pubmed/29137615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Kort, Floor A. S.
Geurts, Marjolein
de Kort, Paul L. M.
van Tuijl, Julia H.
van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W.
Kappelle, L. Jaap
van der Worp, H. Bart
Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
title Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
title_full Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
title_fullStr Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
title_full_unstemmed Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
title_short Advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
title_sort advance directives, proxy opinions, and treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0234-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dekortflooras advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke
AT geurtsmarjolein advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke
AT dekortpaullm advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke
AT vantuijljuliah advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke
AT vanthielghislainejmw advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke
AT kappelleljaap advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke
AT vanderworphbart advancedirectivesproxyopinionsandtreatmentrestrictionsinpatientswithseverestroke