Cargando…

Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2015, 267 ESCC patients who received definit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Li-Ling, Xi, Mian, Yang, Ya-Di, Li, Qiao-Qiao, Zhao, Lei, Zhang, Peng, Liu, Shi-Liang, Liu, Meng-Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151927
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21131
_version_ 1783278917903187968
author Luo, Li-Ling
Xi, Mian
Yang, Ya-Di
Li, Qiao-Qiao
Zhao, Lei
Zhang, Peng
Liu, Shi-Liang
Liu, Meng-Zhong
author_facet Luo, Li-Ling
Xi, Mian
Yang, Ya-Di
Li, Qiao-Qiao
Zhao, Lei
Zhang, Peng
Liu, Shi-Liang
Liu, Meng-Zhong
author_sort Luo, Li-Ling
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2015, 267 ESCC patients who received definitive CRT with docetaxel and cisplatin were enrolled in this study. Through a matched case-control study, 85 patients receiving IC before CRT were matched 1:1 to patients who received CRT alone, according to age, gender, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, and pretreatment TNM stage. Results: The median overall survival (OS) in the IC group was significantly better than that in the CRT group (26.0 vs. 22.0 months), with 3-year OS rates of 30.6% vs. 25.9%, respectively (P = 0.028). However, IC plus CRT was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 leukopenia than CRT alone (P = 0.048). The overall clinical response rate was 50.6% after IC in the IC group. The IC responder group showed significantly more favorable OS (P=0.002) and progression-free survival (P=0.001) compared with the IC non-responder group and the CRT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 60 (P = 0.003) and the addition of IC (P=0.016) were independent prognostic factors that affected survival positively. Conclusions: The addition of IC before CRT yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and manageable toxicities. The combination of IC with CRT might be a promising treatment strategy to further improve systemic control and survival in ESCC. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm the role of IC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5687157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56871572017-11-18 Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Luo, Li-Ling Xi, Mian Yang, Ya-Di Li, Qiao-Qiao Zhao, Lei Zhang, Peng Liu, Shi-Liang Liu, Meng-Zhong J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2015, 267 ESCC patients who received definitive CRT with docetaxel and cisplatin were enrolled in this study. Through a matched case-control study, 85 patients receiving IC before CRT were matched 1:1 to patients who received CRT alone, according to age, gender, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, and pretreatment TNM stage. Results: The median overall survival (OS) in the IC group was significantly better than that in the CRT group (26.0 vs. 22.0 months), with 3-year OS rates of 30.6% vs. 25.9%, respectively (P = 0.028). However, IC plus CRT was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 leukopenia than CRT alone (P = 0.048). The overall clinical response rate was 50.6% after IC in the IC group. The IC responder group showed significantly more favorable OS (P=0.002) and progression-free survival (P=0.001) compared with the IC non-responder group and the CRT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 60 (P = 0.003) and the addition of IC (P=0.016) were independent prognostic factors that affected survival positively. Conclusions: The addition of IC before CRT yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and manageable toxicities. The combination of IC with CRT might be a promising treatment strategy to further improve systemic control and survival in ESCC. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm the role of IC. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5687157/ /pubmed/29151927 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21131 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Luo, Li-Ling
Xi, Mian
Yang, Ya-Di
Li, Qiao-Qiao
Zhao, Lei
Zhang, Peng
Liu, Shi-Liang
Liu, Meng-Zhong
Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_short Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_sort comparative outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151927
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21131
work_keys_str_mv AT luoliling comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT ximian comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT yangyadi comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT liqiaoqiao comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zhaolei comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zhangpeng comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT liushiliang comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT liumengzhong comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma