Cargando…
Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2015, 267 ESCC patients who received definit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151927 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21131 |
_version_ | 1783278917903187968 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Li-Ling Xi, Mian Yang, Ya-Di Li, Qiao-Qiao Zhao, Lei Zhang, Peng Liu, Shi-Liang Liu, Meng-Zhong |
author_facet | Luo, Li-Ling Xi, Mian Yang, Ya-Di Li, Qiao-Qiao Zhao, Lei Zhang, Peng Liu, Shi-Liang Liu, Meng-Zhong |
author_sort | Luo, Li-Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2015, 267 ESCC patients who received definitive CRT with docetaxel and cisplatin were enrolled in this study. Through a matched case-control study, 85 patients receiving IC before CRT were matched 1:1 to patients who received CRT alone, according to age, gender, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, and pretreatment TNM stage. Results: The median overall survival (OS) in the IC group was significantly better than that in the CRT group (26.0 vs. 22.0 months), with 3-year OS rates of 30.6% vs. 25.9%, respectively (P = 0.028). However, IC plus CRT was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 leukopenia than CRT alone (P = 0.048). The overall clinical response rate was 50.6% after IC in the IC group. The IC responder group showed significantly more favorable OS (P=0.002) and progression-free survival (P=0.001) compared with the IC non-responder group and the CRT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 60 (P = 0.003) and the addition of IC (P=0.016) were independent prognostic factors that affected survival positively. Conclusions: The addition of IC before CRT yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and manageable toxicities. The combination of IC with CRT might be a promising treatment strategy to further improve systemic control and survival in ESCC. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm the role of IC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5687157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56871572017-11-18 Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Luo, Li-Ling Xi, Mian Yang, Ya-Di Li, Qiao-Qiao Zhao, Lei Zhang, Peng Liu, Shi-Liang Liu, Meng-Zhong J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2015, 267 ESCC patients who received definitive CRT with docetaxel and cisplatin were enrolled in this study. Through a matched case-control study, 85 patients receiving IC before CRT were matched 1:1 to patients who received CRT alone, according to age, gender, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, and pretreatment TNM stage. Results: The median overall survival (OS) in the IC group was significantly better than that in the CRT group (26.0 vs. 22.0 months), with 3-year OS rates of 30.6% vs. 25.9%, respectively (P = 0.028). However, IC plus CRT was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 leukopenia than CRT alone (P = 0.048). The overall clinical response rate was 50.6% after IC in the IC group. The IC responder group showed significantly more favorable OS (P=0.002) and progression-free survival (P=0.001) compared with the IC non-responder group and the CRT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 60 (P = 0.003) and the addition of IC (P=0.016) were independent prognostic factors that affected survival positively. Conclusions: The addition of IC before CRT yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and manageable toxicities. The combination of IC with CRT might be a promising treatment strategy to further improve systemic control and survival in ESCC. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm the role of IC. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5687157/ /pubmed/29151927 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21131 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Luo, Li-Ling Xi, Mian Yang, Ya-Di Li, Qiao-Qiao Zhao, Lei Zhang, Peng Liu, Shi-Liang Liu, Meng-Zhong Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title | Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full | Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_short | Comparative Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone In Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_sort | comparative outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151927 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luoliling comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT ximian comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT yangyadi comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT liqiaoqiao comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT zhaolei comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT zhangpeng comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT liushiliang comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma AT liumengzhong comparativeoutcomesofinductionchemotherapyfollowedbydefinitivechemoradiotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyaloneinesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma |