Cargando…

Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results

PURPOSE: This evaluation compares propofol and benzodiazepine sedation for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in order to identify the potential economic benefits from different payers’ perspectives. METHODS: The patient-level simulation model incorporated efficacy estim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pradelli, Lorenzo, Povero, Massimiliano, Bürkle, Hartmut, Kampmeier, Tim-Gerald, Della-Rocca, Giorgio, Feuersenger, Astrid, Baron, Jean-Francois, Westphal, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184423
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S136720
_version_ 1783278971164557312
author Pradelli, Lorenzo
Povero, Massimiliano
Bürkle, Hartmut
Kampmeier, Tim-Gerald
Della-Rocca, Giorgio
Feuersenger, Astrid
Baron, Jean-Francois
Westphal, Martin
author_facet Pradelli, Lorenzo
Povero, Massimiliano
Bürkle, Hartmut
Kampmeier, Tim-Gerald
Della-Rocca, Giorgio
Feuersenger, Astrid
Baron, Jean-Francois
Westphal, Martin
author_sort Pradelli, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This evaluation compares propofol and benzodiazepine sedation for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in order to identify the potential economic benefits from different payers’ perspectives. METHODS: The patient-level simulation model incorporated efficacy estimates from a structured meta-analysis and ICU-related costs from Italy, Germany, France, UK, and the USA. Efficacy outcomes were ICU length of stay (LOS), mechanical ventilation duration, and weaning time. We calculated ICU costs from mechanical ventilation duration and ICU LOS based on national average ICU costs with and without mechanical ventilation. Three scenarios were investigated: 1) long-term sedation >24 hours based on results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 2) long-term sedation based on RCT plus non-RCT results; and 3) short-term sedation <24 hours based on RCT results. We tested the model’s robustness for input uncertainties by deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: In the base case, mean savings with propofol versus benzodiazepines in long-term sedation ranged from €406 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 646 to 164) in Italy to 1,632 € (95% CI: 2,362 to 880) in the USA. Inclusion of non-RCT data corroborated these results. Savings in short-term sedation ranged from €148 (95% CI: 291 to 2) in Italy to €502 (95% CI: 936 to 57) in the USA. Parameters related to ICU and mechanical ventilation had a stronger influence in the DSA than drug-related parameters. In PSA, propofol reduced costs and ICU LOS compared to benzodiazepines in 94%–100% of simulations. The largest savings may be possible in the UK and the USA due to higher ICU costs. CONCLUSION: Current ICU sedation guidelines recommend propofol rather than midazolam for mechanically ventilated patients. This evaluation endorses the recommendation as it may lead to better outcomes and savings for health care systems, especially in countries with higher ICU-related costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5687490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56874902017-11-28 Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results Pradelli, Lorenzo Povero, Massimiliano Bürkle, Hartmut Kampmeier, Tim-Gerald Della-Rocca, Giorgio Feuersenger, Astrid Baron, Jean-Francois Westphal, Martin Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research PURPOSE: This evaluation compares propofol and benzodiazepine sedation for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in order to identify the potential economic benefits from different payers’ perspectives. METHODS: The patient-level simulation model incorporated efficacy estimates from a structured meta-analysis and ICU-related costs from Italy, Germany, France, UK, and the USA. Efficacy outcomes were ICU length of stay (LOS), mechanical ventilation duration, and weaning time. We calculated ICU costs from mechanical ventilation duration and ICU LOS based on national average ICU costs with and without mechanical ventilation. Three scenarios were investigated: 1) long-term sedation >24 hours based on results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 2) long-term sedation based on RCT plus non-RCT results; and 3) short-term sedation <24 hours based on RCT results. We tested the model’s robustness for input uncertainties by deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: In the base case, mean savings with propofol versus benzodiazepines in long-term sedation ranged from €406 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 646 to 164) in Italy to 1,632 € (95% CI: 2,362 to 880) in the USA. Inclusion of non-RCT data corroborated these results. Savings in short-term sedation ranged from €148 (95% CI: 291 to 2) in Italy to €502 (95% CI: 936 to 57) in the USA. Parameters related to ICU and mechanical ventilation had a stronger influence in the DSA than drug-related parameters. In PSA, propofol reduced costs and ICU LOS compared to benzodiazepines in 94%–100% of simulations. The largest savings may be possible in the UK and the USA due to higher ICU costs. CONCLUSION: Current ICU sedation guidelines recommend propofol rather than midazolam for mechanically ventilated patients. This evaluation endorses the recommendation as it may lead to better outcomes and savings for health care systems, especially in countries with higher ICU-related costs. Dove Medical Press 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5687490/ /pubmed/29184423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S136720 Text en © 2017 Pradelli et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pradelli, Lorenzo
Povero, Massimiliano
Bürkle, Hartmut
Kampmeier, Tim-Gerald
Della-Rocca, Giorgio
Feuersenger, Astrid
Baron, Jean-Francois
Westphal, Martin
Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results
title Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results
title_full Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results
title_fullStr Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results
title_full_unstemmed Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results
title_short Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results
title_sort propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? an economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184423
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S136720
work_keys_str_mv AT pradellilorenzo propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults
AT poveromassimiliano propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults
AT burklehartmut propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults
AT kampmeiertimgerald propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults
AT dellaroccagiorgio propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults
AT feuersengerastrid propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults
AT baronjeanfrancois propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults
AT westphalmartin propofolorbenzodiazepinesforshortandlongtermsedationinintensivecareunitsaneconomicevaluationbasedonmetaanalyticresults