Cargando…

Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening

OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of type 2 diabetes care in general practice and changes in the quality of care between 2005 and 2014, and to identify areas of diabetes care requiring improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were performed that included patients with type...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakke, Åsne, Cooper, John G, Thue, Geir, Skeie, Svein, Carlsen, Siri, Dalen, Ingvild, Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld, Madsen, Tone Vonheim, Oord, Ellen Renate, Berg, Tore Julsrud, Claudi, Tor, Tran, Anh Thi, Gjelsvik, Bjørn, Jenum, Anne Karen, Sandberg, Sverre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000459
_version_ 1783278976150536192
author Bakke, Åsne
Cooper, John G
Thue, Geir
Skeie, Svein
Carlsen, Siri
Dalen, Ingvild
Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld
Madsen, Tone Vonheim
Oord, Ellen Renate
Berg, Tore Julsrud
Claudi, Tor
Tran, Anh Thi
Gjelsvik, Bjørn
Jenum, Anne Karen
Sandberg, Sverre
author_facet Bakke, Åsne
Cooper, John G
Thue, Geir
Skeie, Svein
Carlsen, Siri
Dalen, Ingvild
Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld
Madsen, Tone Vonheim
Oord, Ellen Renate
Berg, Tore Julsrud
Claudi, Tor
Tran, Anh Thi
Gjelsvik, Bjørn
Jenum, Anne Karen
Sandberg, Sverre
author_sort Bakke, Åsne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of type 2 diabetes care in general practice and changes in the quality of care between 2005 and 2014, and to identify areas of diabetes care requiring improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were performed that included patients with type 2 diabetes in selected areas (n=9464 in 2014, n=5463 in 2005). Quality of care was assessed based on key recommendations in national guidelines. Differences in clinical performance between 2005 and 2014 were assessed in regression models adjusting for age, sex, counties and clustering within general practices. RESULTS: Treatment targets were achieved in a higher proportion of patients in 2014 compared with 2005: hemoglobin A1c ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol) in 62.8% vs 54.3%, blood pressure ≤135/80 mm Hg in 44.9% vs 36.6%, and total cholesterol ≤4.5 mmol/L in 49.9% vs 33.5% (all adjusted P≤0.001). Regarding screening procedures for microvascular complications, fewer patients had recorded an eye examination (61.0% vs 71.5%, adjusted P<0.001), whereas more patients underwent monofilament test (25.9% vs 18.7%, adjusted P<0.001). Testing for albuminuria remained low (30.3%) in 2014. A still high percentage were current smokers (22.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate improvements in risk factor control for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice during the last decade, which are similar to improvements reported in other countries. We report major gaps in the performance of recommended screening procedures to detect microvascular complications. The proportion of daily smokers remains high. We suggest incentives to promote further improvements in diabetes care in Norway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5687527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56875272017-11-24 Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening Bakke, Åsne Cooper, John G Thue, Geir Skeie, Svein Carlsen, Siri Dalen, Ingvild Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld Madsen, Tone Vonheim Oord, Ellen Renate Berg, Tore Julsrud Claudi, Tor Tran, Anh Thi Gjelsvik, Bjørn Jenum, Anne Karen Sandberg, Sverre BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of type 2 diabetes care in general practice and changes in the quality of care between 2005 and 2014, and to identify areas of diabetes care requiring improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were performed that included patients with type 2 diabetes in selected areas (n=9464 in 2014, n=5463 in 2005). Quality of care was assessed based on key recommendations in national guidelines. Differences in clinical performance between 2005 and 2014 were assessed in regression models adjusting for age, sex, counties and clustering within general practices. RESULTS: Treatment targets were achieved in a higher proportion of patients in 2014 compared with 2005: hemoglobin A1c ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol) in 62.8% vs 54.3%, blood pressure ≤135/80 mm Hg in 44.9% vs 36.6%, and total cholesterol ≤4.5 mmol/L in 49.9% vs 33.5% (all adjusted P≤0.001). Regarding screening procedures for microvascular complications, fewer patients had recorded an eye examination (61.0% vs 71.5%, adjusted P<0.001), whereas more patients underwent monofilament test (25.9% vs 18.7%, adjusted P<0.001). Testing for albuminuria remained low (30.3%) in 2014. A still high percentage were current smokers (22.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate improvements in risk factor control for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice during the last decade, which are similar to improvements reported in other countries. We report major gaps in the performance of recommended screening procedures to detect microvascular complications. The proportion of daily smokers remains high. We suggest incentives to promote further improvements in diabetes care in Norway. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5687527/ /pubmed/29177051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000459 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Bakke, Åsne
Cooper, John G
Thue, Geir
Skeie, Svein
Carlsen, Siri
Dalen, Ingvild
Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld
Madsen, Tone Vonheim
Oord, Ellen Renate
Berg, Tore Julsrud
Claudi, Tor
Tran, Anh Thi
Gjelsvik, Bjørn
Jenum, Anne Karen
Sandberg, Sverre
Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
title Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
title_full Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
title_fullStr Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
title_full_unstemmed Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
title_short Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
title_sort type 2 diabetes in general practice in norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000459
work_keys_str_mv AT bakkeasne type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT cooperjohng type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT thuegeir type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT skeiesvein type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT carlsensiri type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT daleningvild type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT løvaaskariannefjeld type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT madsentonevonheim type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT oordellenrenate type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT bergtorejulsrud type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT clauditor type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT trananhthi type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT gjelsvikbjørn type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT jenumannekaren type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening
AT sandbergsverre type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening