Cargando…
Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening
OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of type 2 diabetes care in general practice and changes in the quality of care between 2005 and 2014, and to identify areas of diabetes care requiring improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were performed that included patients with type...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000459 |
_version_ | 1783278976150536192 |
---|---|
author | Bakke, Åsne Cooper, John G Thue, Geir Skeie, Svein Carlsen, Siri Dalen, Ingvild Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld Madsen, Tone Vonheim Oord, Ellen Renate Berg, Tore Julsrud Claudi, Tor Tran, Anh Thi Gjelsvik, Bjørn Jenum, Anne Karen Sandberg, Sverre |
author_facet | Bakke, Åsne Cooper, John G Thue, Geir Skeie, Svein Carlsen, Siri Dalen, Ingvild Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld Madsen, Tone Vonheim Oord, Ellen Renate Berg, Tore Julsrud Claudi, Tor Tran, Anh Thi Gjelsvik, Bjørn Jenum, Anne Karen Sandberg, Sverre |
author_sort | Bakke, Åsne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of type 2 diabetes care in general practice and changes in the quality of care between 2005 and 2014, and to identify areas of diabetes care requiring improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were performed that included patients with type 2 diabetes in selected areas (n=9464 in 2014, n=5463 in 2005). Quality of care was assessed based on key recommendations in national guidelines. Differences in clinical performance between 2005 and 2014 were assessed in regression models adjusting for age, sex, counties and clustering within general practices. RESULTS: Treatment targets were achieved in a higher proportion of patients in 2014 compared with 2005: hemoglobin A1c ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol) in 62.8% vs 54.3%, blood pressure ≤135/80 mm Hg in 44.9% vs 36.6%, and total cholesterol ≤4.5 mmol/L in 49.9% vs 33.5% (all adjusted P≤0.001). Regarding screening procedures for microvascular complications, fewer patients had recorded an eye examination (61.0% vs 71.5%, adjusted P<0.001), whereas more patients underwent monofilament test (25.9% vs 18.7%, adjusted P<0.001). Testing for albuminuria remained low (30.3%) in 2014. A still high percentage were current smokers (22.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate improvements in risk factor control for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice during the last decade, which are similar to improvements reported in other countries. We report major gaps in the performance of recommended screening procedures to detect microvascular complications. The proportion of daily smokers remains high. We suggest incentives to promote further improvements in diabetes care in Norway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5687527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56875272017-11-24 Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening Bakke, Åsne Cooper, John G Thue, Geir Skeie, Svein Carlsen, Siri Dalen, Ingvild Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld Madsen, Tone Vonheim Oord, Ellen Renate Berg, Tore Julsrud Claudi, Tor Tran, Anh Thi Gjelsvik, Bjørn Jenum, Anne Karen Sandberg, Sverre BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of type 2 diabetes care in general practice and changes in the quality of care between 2005 and 2014, and to identify areas of diabetes care requiring improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were performed that included patients with type 2 diabetes in selected areas (n=9464 in 2014, n=5463 in 2005). Quality of care was assessed based on key recommendations in national guidelines. Differences in clinical performance between 2005 and 2014 were assessed in regression models adjusting for age, sex, counties and clustering within general practices. RESULTS: Treatment targets were achieved in a higher proportion of patients in 2014 compared with 2005: hemoglobin A1c ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol) in 62.8% vs 54.3%, blood pressure ≤135/80 mm Hg in 44.9% vs 36.6%, and total cholesterol ≤4.5 mmol/L in 49.9% vs 33.5% (all adjusted P≤0.001). Regarding screening procedures for microvascular complications, fewer patients had recorded an eye examination (61.0% vs 71.5%, adjusted P<0.001), whereas more patients underwent monofilament test (25.9% vs 18.7%, adjusted P<0.001). Testing for albuminuria remained low (30.3%) in 2014. A still high percentage were current smokers (22.7%). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate improvements in risk factor control for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice during the last decade, which are similar to improvements reported in other countries. We report major gaps in the performance of recommended screening procedures to detect microvascular complications. The proportion of daily smokers remains high. We suggest incentives to promote further improvements in diabetes care in Norway. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5687527/ /pubmed/29177051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000459 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology/Health Services Research Bakke, Åsne Cooper, John G Thue, Geir Skeie, Svein Carlsen, Siri Dalen, Ingvild Løvaas, Karianne Fjeld Madsen, Tone Vonheim Oord, Ellen Renate Berg, Tore Julsrud Claudi, Tor Tran, Anh Thi Gjelsvik, Bjørn Jenum, Anne Karen Sandberg, Sverre Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening |
title | Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening |
title_full | Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening |
title_fullStr | Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening |
title_short | Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening |
title_sort | type 2 diabetes in general practice in norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening |
topic | Epidemiology/Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000459 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakkeasne type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT cooperjohng type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT thuegeir type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT skeiesvein type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT carlsensiri type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT daleningvild type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT løvaaskariannefjeld type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT madsentonevonheim type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT oordellenrenate type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT bergtorejulsrud type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT clauditor type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT trananhthi type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT gjelsvikbjørn type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT jenumannekaren type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening AT sandbergsverre type2diabetesingeneralpracticeinnorway20052014moderateimprovementsinriskfactorcontrolbutstillmajorgapsincomplicationscreening |