Cargando…
Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial valve placement has potential as a treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a robust evidence base will be needed to convince commissioners of healthcare that it is a high-value treatment. We sought to develop the evidence base by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000214 |
_version_ | 1783278979879272448 |
---|---|
author | Klooster, Karin Slebos, Dirk-Jan Zoumot, Zaid Davey, Claire Shah, Pallav L Hopkinson, Nicholas S |
author_facet | Klooster, Karin Slebos, Dirk-Jan Zoumot, Zaid Davey, Claire Shah, Pallav L Hopkinson, Nicholas S |
author_sort | Klooster, Karin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial valve placement has potential as a treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a robust evidence base will be needed to convince commissioners of healthcare that it is a high-value treatment. We sought to develop the evidence base by performing an individual patient-level analysis of randomised controlled trials in people with heterogeneous emphysema and an absence of collateral ventilation. METHODS: A literature search (PROSPERO register CRD42016048127) identified two trials meeting these criteria, the BelieVeR-HIFi and STELVIO studies. Anonymised individual patient data were obtained from investigators and analysed. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) from baseline between the treatment and control groups. Secondary end points were change from baseline in 6 min walk distance (6MWD), Medical Research Council dyspnoea score and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: 114 individuals were treated with 3-month to 6-month follow-up data available for 101 individuals. FEV(1) improved by 23.1 (±28.3)% in patients treated with valves with a mean (95% CI) difference in response between groups of 17.8 (26.5, 9.2)% (p<0.0001). Relative to controls valve placement was associated with a fall in residual volume of 0.64 (0.43, 0.86) L (p<0.0001), a 9.5 (3.5, 15.6) unit fall in SGRQ (p=0.0022) and a 64.2 (94.0, 34.5) m increase in 6MWD. There were three deaths in the treatment arm and the pneumothorax rate was 15%. CONCLUSIONS: These data strengthen the evidence that endobronchial valve treatment can produce clinically meaningful improvements in appropriately selected COPD patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5687542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56875422018-02-13 Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials Klooster, Karin Slebos, Dirk-Jan Zoumot, Zaid Davey, Claire Shah, Pallav L Hopkinson, Nicholas S BMJ Open Respir Res Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial valve placement has potential as a treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a robust evidence base will be needed to convince commissioners of healthcare that it is a high-value treatment. We sought to develop the evidence base by performing an individual patient-level analysis of randomised controlled trials in people with heterogeneous emphysema and an absence of collateral ventilation. METHODS: A literature search (PROSPERO register CRD42016048127) identified two trials meeting these criteria, the BelieVeR-HIFi and STELVIO studies. Anonymised individual patient data were obtained from investigators and analysed. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) from baseline between the treatment and control groups. Secondary end points were change from baseline in 6 min walk distance (6MWD), Medical Research Council dyspnoea score and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: 114 individuals were treated with 3-month to 6-month follow-up data available for 101 individuals. FEV(1) improved by 23.1 (±28.3)% in patients treated with valves with a mean (95% CI) difference in response between groups of 17.8 (26.5, 9.2)% (p<0.0001). Relative to controls valve placement was associated with a fall in residual volume of 0.64 (0.43, 0.86) L (p<0.0001), a 9.5 (3.5, 15.6) unit fall in SGRQ (p=0.0022) and a 64.2 (94.0, 34.5) m increase in 6MWD. There were three deaths in the treatment arm and the pneumothorax rate was 15%. CONCLUSIONS: These data strengthen the evidence that endobronchial valve treatment can produce clinically meaningful improvements in appropriately selected COPD patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5687542/ /pubmed/29441206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000214 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Klooster, Karin Slebos, Dirk-Jan Zoumot, Zaid Davey, Claire Shah, Pallav L Hopkinson, Nicholas S Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials |
title | Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full | Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short | Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort | endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kloosterkarin endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT slebosdirkjan endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT zoumotzaid endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT daveyclaire endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT shahpallavl endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT hopkinsonnicholass endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |