Cargando…

Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial valve placement has potential as a treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a robust evidence base will be needed to convince commissioners of healthcare that it is a high-value treatment. We sought to develop the evidence base by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klooster, Karin, Slebos, Dirk-Jan, Zoumot, Zaid, Davey, Claire, Shah, Pallav L, Hopkinson, Nicholas S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000214
_version_ 1783278979879272448
author Klooster, Karin
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Zoumot, Zaid
Davey, Claire
Shah, Pallav L
Hopkinson, Nicholas S
author_facet Klooster, Karin
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Zoumot, Zaid
Davey, Claire
Shah, Pallav L
Hopkinson, Nicholas S
author_sort Klooster, Karin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial valve placement has potential as a treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a robust evidence base will be needed to convince commissioners of healthcare that it is a high-value treatment. We sought to develop the evidence base by performing an individual patient-level analysis of randomised controlled trials in people with heterogeneous emphysema and an absence of collateral ventilation. METHODS: A literature search (PROSPERO register CRD42016048127) identified two trials meeting these criteria, the BelieVeR-HIFi and STELVIO studies. Anonymised individual patient data were obtained from investigators and analysed. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) from baseline between the treatment and control groups. Secondary end points were change from baseline in 6 min walk distance (6MWD), Medical Research Council dyspnoea score and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: 114 individuals were treated with 3-month to 6-month follow-up data available for 101 individuals. FEV(1) improved by 23.1 (±28.3)% in patients treated with valves with a mean (95% CI) difference in response between groups of 17.8 (26.5, 9.2)% (p<0.0001). Relative to controls valve placement was associated with a fall in residual volume of 0.64 (0.43, 0.86) L (p<0.0001), a 9.5 (3.5, 15.6) unit fall in SGRQ (p=0.0022) and a 64.2 (94.0, 34.5) m increase in 6MWD. There were three deaths in the treatment arm and the pneumothorax rate was 15%. CONCLUSIONS: These data strengthen the evidence that endobronchial valve treatment can produce clinically meaningful improvements in appropriately selected COPD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5687542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56875422018-02-13 Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials Klooster, Karin Slebos, Dirk-Jan Zoumot, Zaid Davey, Claire Shah, Pallav L Hopkinson, Nicholas S BMJ Open Respir Res Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial valve placement has potential as a treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a robust evidence base will be needed to convince commissioners of healthcare that it is a high-value treatment. We sought to develop the evidence base by performing an individual patient-level analysis of randomised controlled trials in people with heterogeneous emphysema and an absence of collateral ventilation. METHODS: A literature search (PROSPERO register CRD42016048127) identified two trials meeting these criteria, the BelieVeR-HIFi and STELVIO studies. Anonymised individual patient data were obtained from investigators and analysed. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) from baseline between the treatment and control groups. Secondary end points were change from baseline in 6 min walk distance (6MWD), Medical Research Council dyspnoea score and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: 114 individuals were treated with 3-month to 6-month follow-up data available for 101 individuals. FEV(1) improved by 23.1 (±28.3)% in patients treated with valves with a mean (95% CI) difference in response between groups of 17.8 (26.5, 9.2)% (p<0.0001). Relative to controls valve placement was associated with a fall in residual volume of 0.64 (0.43, 0.86) L (p<0.0001), a 9.5 (3.5, 15.6) unit fall in SGRQ (p=0.0022) and a 64.2 (94.0, 34.5) m increase in 6MWD. There were three deaths in the treatment arm and the pneumothorax rate was 15%. CONCLUSIONS: These data strengthen the evidence that endobronchial valve treatment can produce clinically meaningful improvements in appropriately selected COPD patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5687542/ /pubmed/29441206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000214 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Klooster, Karin
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Zoumot, Zaid
Davey, Claire
Shah, Pallav L
Hopkinson, Nicholas S
Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
title Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort endobronchial valves for emphysema: an individual patient-level reanalysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000214
work_keys_str_mv AT kloosterkarin endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT slebosdirkjan endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT zoumotzaid endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT daveyclaire endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT shahpallavl endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT hopkinsonnicholass endobronchialvalvesforemphysemaanindividualpatientlevelreanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials