Cargando…

What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis

The standard radiation dose 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy for localized inoperable esophageal cancer as supported by INT-0123 trail is now being challenged since a radiation dose above 50 Gy has been successfully administered with an observable dose–response relationship and insignificant unt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yong, Zhu, Hui-Ping, Wang, Tao, Sun, Chang-Jiang, Ge, Xiao-Lin, Min, Ling-Feng, Zhang, Xian-Wen, Jia, Qing-Qing, Yu, Jie, Yang, Jian-Qi, Allgayer, Heike, Abba, Mohammed L., Zhang, Xi-Zhi, Sun, Xin-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29179502
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18760
_version_ 1783279005795876864
author Chen, Yong
Zhu, Hui-Ping
Wang, Tao
Sun, Chang-Jiang
Ge, Xiao-Lin
Min, Ling-Feng
Zhang, Xian-Wen
Jia, Qing-Qing
Yu, Jie
Yang, Jian-Qi
Allgayer, Heike
Abba, Mohammed L.
Zhang, Xi-Zhi
Sun, Xin-Chen
author_facet Chen, Yong
Zhu, Hui-Ping
Wang, Tao
Sun, Chang-Jiang
Ge, Xiao-Lin
Min, Ling-Feng
Zhang, Xian-Wen
Jia, Qing-Qing
Yu, Jie
Yang, Jian-Qi
Allgayer, Heike
Abba, Mohammed L.
Zhang, Xi-Zhi
Sun, Xin-Chen
author_sort Chen, Yong
collection PubMed
description The standard radiation dose 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy for localized inoperable esophageal cancer as supported by INT-0123 trail is now being challenged since a radiation dose above 50 Gy has been successfully administered with an observable dose–response relationship and insignificant untoward effects. Therefore, to ascertain the treatment benefits of different radiation doses, we performed a meta-analysis with 18 relative publications. According to our findings, a dose between 50 and 70 Gy appears optimal and patients who received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had a significantly better prognosis (pooled HR = 0.78, P = 0.004) as compared with < 60 Gy, especially in Asian countries (pooled HR = 0.75, P = 0.003). However, contradictory results of treatment benefit for ≥ 60 Gy were observed in two studies from Western countries, and the pooled treatment benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation was inconclusive (pooled HR = 0.86, P = 0.64). There was a marginal benefit in locoregional control in those treated with high dose (> 50.4/51 Gy) radiation when compared with those treated with low dose (≤ 50.4/51 Gy) radiation (pooled OR = 0.71, P = 0.06). Patients that received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had better locoregional control (OR = 0.29, P = 0.001), and for distant metastasis control, neither the > 50.4 Gy nor the ≥ 60 Gy treated group had any treatment benefit as compared to the groups that received ≤ 50.4 Gy and < 60 Gy group respectively. Taken together, a dose range of 50 to 70 Gy radiation with CCRT is recommended for non-operable EC patients. A dose of ≥ 60 Gy appears to be better in improving overall survival and locoregional control, especially in Asian countries, while the benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation in Western countries still remains controversial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5687672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56876722017-11-20 What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis Chen, Yong Zhu, Hui-Ping Wang, Tao Sun, Chang-Jiang Ge, Xiao-Lin Min, Ling-Feng Zhang, Xian-Wen Jia, Qing-Qing Yu, Jie Yang, Jian-Qi Allgayer, Heike Abba, Mohammed L. Zhang, Xi-Zhi Sun, Xin-Chen Oncotarget Meta-Analysis The standard radiation dose 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy for localized inoperable esophageal cancer as supported by INT-0123 trail is now being challenged since a radiation dose above 50 Gy has been successfully administered with an observable dose–response relationship and insignificant untoward effects. Therefore, to ascertain the treatment benefits of different radiation doses, we performed a meta-analysis with 18 relative publications. According to our findings, a dose between 50 and 70 Gy appears optimal and patients who received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had a significantly better prognosis (pooled HR = 0.78, P = 0.004) as compared with < 60 Gy, especially in Asian countries (pooled HR = 0.75, P = 0.003). However, contradictory results of treatment benefit for ≥ 60 Gy were observed in two studies from Western countries, and the pooled treatment benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation was inconclusive (pooled HR = 0.86, P = 0.64). There was a marginal benefit in locoregional control in those treated with high dose (> 50.4/51 Gy) radiation when compared with those treated with low dose (≤ 50.4/51 Gy) radiation (pooled OR = 0.71, P = 0.06). Patients that received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had better locoregional control (OR = 0.29, P = 0.001), and for distant metastasis control, neither the > 50.4 Gy nor the ≥ 60 Gy treated group had any treatment benefit as compared to the groups that received ≤ 50.4 Gy and < 60 Gy group respectively. Taken together, a dose range of 50 to 70 Gy radiation with CCRT is recommended for non-operable EC patients. A dose of ≥ 60 Gy appears to be better in improving overall survival and locoregional control, especially in Asian countries, while the benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation in Western countries still remains controversial. Impact Journals LLC 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5687672/ /pubmed/29179502 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18760 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Chen, Yong
Zhu, Hui-Ping
Wang, Tao
Sun, Chang-Jiang
Ge, Xiao-Lin
Min, Ling-Feng
Zhang, Xian-Wen
Jia, Qing-Qing
Yu, Jie
Yang, Jian-Qi
Allgayer, Heike
Abba, Mohammed L.
Zhang, Xi-Zhi
Sun, Xin-Chen
What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis
title What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis
title_full What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis
title_fullStr What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis
title_short What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis
title_sort what is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5687672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29179502
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18760
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyong whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT zhuhuiping whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT wangtao whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT sunchangjiang whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT gexiaolin whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT minlingfeng whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT zhangxianwen whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT jiaqingqing whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT yujie whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT yangjianqi whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT allgayerheike whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT abbamohammedl whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT zhangxizhi whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis
AT sunxinchen whatistheoptimalradiationdosefornonoperableesophagealcancerdissectingtheevidenceinametaanalysis