Cargando…

Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution

Recent studies highlight the importance of the temporal domain in visual processing. Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency (CFF), the frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous, is widely used for evaluating visual temporal processing. However, substantial variability in the psycho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eisen-Enosh, Auria, Farah, Nairouz, Burgansky-Eliash, Zvia, Polat, Uri, Mandel, Yossi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15034-z
_version_ 1783279085386989568
author Eisen-Enosh, Auria
Farah, Nairouz
Burgansky-Eliash, Zvia
Polat, Uri
Mandel, Yossi
author_facet Eisen-Enosh, Auria
Farah, Nairouz
Burgansky-Eliash, Zvia
Polat, Uri
Mandel, Yossi
author_sort Eisen-Enosh, Auria
collection PubMed
description Recent studies highlight the importance of the temporal domain in visual processing. Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency (CFF), the frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous, is widely used for evaluating visual temporal processing. However, substantial variability in the psychophysical paradigms, used for measuring CFF, leads to substantial variability in the reported results. Here, we report on a comprehensive comparison of CFF measurements through three different psychophysical paradigms: methods of limits; method of constant stimuli, and staircase method. Our results demonstrate that the CFF can be reliably measured with high repeatability by all three psychophysics methods. However, correlations (r = 0.92, p≪0.001) and agreement (Bland Altman test indicated 95% confidence limit variation of ±3.6 Hz), were highest between the staircase and the constant stimuli methods. The time required to complete the test was significantly longer for the constant stimuli method as compared to other methods (p < 0.001). Our results highlight the suitability of the adaptive paradigm for efficiently measuring temporal resolution in the visual system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56881032017-11-30 Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution Eisen-Enosh, Auria Farah, Nairouz Burgansky-Eliash, Zvia Polat, Uri Mandel, Yossi Sci Rep Article Recent studies highlight the importance of the temporal domain in visual processing. Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency (CFF), the frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous, is widely used for evaluating visual temporal processing. However, substantial variability in the psychophysical paradigms, used for measuring CFF, leads to substantial variability in the reported results. Here, we report on a comprehensive comparison of CFF measurements through three different psychophysical paradigms: methods of limits; method of constant stimuli, and staircase method. Our results demonstrate that the CFF can be reliably measured with high repeatability by all three psychophysics methods. However, correlations (r = 0.92, p≪0.001) and agreement (Bland Altman test indicated 95% confidence limit variation of ±3.6 Hz), were highest between the staircase and the constant stimuli methods. The time required to complete the test was significantly longer for the constant stimuli method as compared to other methods (p < 0.001). Our results highlight the suitability of the adaptive paradigm for efficiently measuring temporal resolution in the visual system. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688103/ /pubmed/29142231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15034-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Eisen-Enosh, Auria
Farah, Nairouz
Burgansky-Eliash, Zvia
Polat, Uri
Mandel, Yossi
Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution
title Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution
title_full Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution
title_fullStr Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution
title_short Evaluation of Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency Measurement Methods for the Investigation of Visual Temporal Resolution
title_sort evaluation of critical flicker-fusion frequency measurement methods for the investigation of visual temporal resolution
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15034-z
work_keys_str_mv AT eisenenoshauria evaluationofcriticalflickerfusionfrequencymeasurementmethodsfortheinvestigationofvisualtemporalresolution
AT farahnairouz evaluationofcriticalflickerfusionfrequencymeasurementmethodsfortheinvestigationofvisualtemporalresolution
AT burganskyeliashzvia evaluationofcriticalflickerfusionfrequencymeasurementmethodsfortheinvestigationofvisualtemporalresolution
AT polaturi evaluationofcriticalflickerfusionfrequencymeasurementmethodsfortheinvestigationofvisualtemporalresolution
AT mandelyossi evaluationofcriticalflickerfusionfrequencymeasurementmethodsfortheinvestigationofvisualtemporalresolution