Cargando…

People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism

People consistently show preferences and behaviors that benefit others at a cost to themselves, a phenomenon termed altruism. We investigated if perception of one’s body signals – interoception - may be underlying such behaviors. We tested if participants’ sensitivity to their own heartbeat predicte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piech, Richard M., Strelchuk, Daniela, Knights, Jake, Hjälmheden, Jonathan V., Olofsson, Jonas K., Aspell, Jane E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14318-8
_version_ 1783279099176812544
author Piech, Richard M.
Strelchuk, Daniela
Knights, Jake
Hjälmheden, Jonathan V.
Olofsson, Jonas K.
Aspell, Jane E.
author_facet Piech, Richard M.
Strelchuk, Daniela
Knights, Jake
Hjälmheden, Jonathan V.
Olofsson, Jonas K.
Aspell, Jane E.
author_sort Piech, Richard M.
collection PubMed
description People consistently show preferences and behaviors that benefit others at a cost to themselves, a phenomenon termed altruism. We investigated if perception of one’s body signals – interoception - may be underlying such behaviors. We tested if participants’ sensitivity to their own heartbeat predicted their decision on a choice between self-interest and altruism, and if improving this sensitivity through training would make participants more altruistic. Across these two experiments, interoceptive sensitivity predicted altruism measured through monetary generosity. Improving interoceptive sensitivity did, however, not lead to more altruistic behaviour. We conclude that there is a unique link between interoception and altruistic behaviour, likely established over an individual’s history of altruistic acts, and the body responses they elicit. The findings suggest that humans might literally ‘listen to their heart’ to guide their altruistic behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56881592017-11-24 People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism Piech, Richard M. Strelchuk, Daniela Knights, Jake Hjälmheden, Jonathan V. Olofsson, Jonas K. Aspell, Jane E. Sci Rep Article People consistently show preferences and behaviors that benefit others at a cost to themselves, a phenomenon termed altruism. We investigated if perception of one’s body signals – interoception - may be underlying such behaviors. We tested if participants’ sensitivity to their own heartbeat predicted their decision on a choice between self-interest and altruism, and if improving this sensitivity through training would make participants more altruistic. Across these two experiments, interoceptive sensitivity predicted altruism measured through monetary generosity. Improving interoceptive sensitivity did, however, not lead to more altruistic behaviour. We conclude that there is a unique link between interoception and altruistic behaviour, likely established over an individual’s history of altruistic acts, and the body responses they elicit. The findings suggest that humans might literally ‘listen to their heart’ to guide their altruistic behavior. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688159/ /pubmed/29142226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14318-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Piech, Richard M.
Strelchuk, Daniela
Knights, Jake
Hjälmheden, Jonathan V.
Olofsson, Jonas K.
Aspell, Jane E.
People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism
title People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism
title_full People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism
title_fullStr People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism
title_full_unstemmed People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism
title_short People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism
title_sort people with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14318-8
work_keys_str_mv AT piechrichardm peoplewithhigherinteroceptivesensitivityaremorealtruisticbutimprovinginteroceptiondoesnotincreasealtruism
AT strelchukdaniela peoplewithhigherinteroceptivesensitivityaremorealtruisticbutimprovinginteroceptiondoesnotincreasealtruism
AT knightsjake peoplewithhigherinteroceptivesensitivityaremorealtruisticbutimprovinginteroceptiondoesnotincreasealtruism
AT hjalmhedenjonathanv peoplewithhigherinteroceptivesensitivityaremorealtruisticbutimprovinginteroceptiondoesnotincreasealtruism
AT olofssonjonask peoplewithhigherinteroceptivesensitivityaremorealtruisticbutimprovinginteroceptiondoesnotincreasealtruism
AT aspelljanee peoplewithhigherinteroceptivesensitivityaremorealtruisticbutimprovinginteroceptiondoesnotincreasealtruism