Cargando…

A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance

The upright body in quiet stance is usually modeled as a single-link inverted pendulum. This agrees with most of the relevant sensory organs being at the far end of the pendulum, i.e., the eyes and the vestibular system in the head. Movement of the body in quiet stance has often been explained in te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reimann, Hendrik, Schöner, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-017-0733-y
_version_ 1783279114836246528
author Reimann, Hendrik
Schöner, Gregor
author_facet Reimann, Hendrik
Schöner, Gregor
author_sort Reimann, Hendrik
collection PubMed
description The upright body in quiet stance is usually modeled as a single-link inverted pendulum. This agrees with most of the relevant sensory organs being at the far end of the pendulum, i.e., the eyes and the vestibular system in the head. Movement of the body in quiet stance has often been explained in terms of the “ankle strategy,” where most movement is generated by the ankle musculature, while more proximal muscle groups are only rarely activated for faster movements or in response to perturbations, for instance, by flexing at the hips in what has been called the “hip strategy.” Recent empirical evidence, however, shows that instead of being negligible in quiet stance, the movement in the knee and hip joints is even larger on average than the movement in the ankle joints (J Neurophysiol 97:3024-3035, 2007). Moreover, there is a strong pattern of covariation between movements in the ankle, knee and hip joints in a way that most of the observed movements leave the anterior–posterior position of the whole-body center of mass (CoM) invariant, i.e., only change the configuration of the different body parts around the CoM, instead of moving the body as a whole. It is unknown, however, where this covariation between joint angles during quiet stance originates from. In this paper, we aim to answer this question using a comprehensive model of the biomechanical, muscular and neural dynamics of a quietly standing human. We explore four different possible feedback laws for the control of this multi-link pendulum in upright stance that map sensory data to motor commands. We perform simulation studies to compare the generated inter-joint covariance patterns with experimental data. We find that control laws that actively coordinate muscle activation between the different joints generate correct variance patterns, while control laws that control each joint separately do not. Different specific forms of this coordination are compatible with the data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56882242017-11-30 A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance Reimann, Hendrik Schöner, Gregor Biol Cybern Original Article The upright body in quiet stance is usually modeled as a single-link inverted pendulum. This agrees with most of the relevant sensory organs being at the far end of the pendulum, i.e., the eyes and the vestibular system in the head. Movement of the body in quiet stance has often been explained in terms of the “ankle strategy,” where most movement is generated by the ankle musculature, while more proximal muscle groups are only rarely activated for faster movements or in response to perturbations, for instance, by flexing at the hips in what has been called the “hip strategy.” Recent empirical evidence, however, shows that instead of being negligible in quiet stance, the movement in the knee and hip joints is even larger on average than the movement in the ankle joints (J Neurophysiol 97:3024-3035, 2007). Moreover, there is a strong pattern of covariation between movements in the ankle, knee and hip joints in a way that most of the observed movements leave the anterior–posterior position of the whole-body center of mass (CoM) invariant, i.e., only change the configuration of the different body parts around the CoM, instead of moving the body as a whole. It is unknown, however, where this covariation between joint angles during quiet stance originates from. In this paper, we aim to answer this question using a comprehensive model of the biomechanical, muscular and neural dynamics of a quietly standing human. We explore four different possible feedback laws for the control of this multi-link pendulum in upright stance that map sensory data to motor commands. We perform simulation studies to compare the generated inter-joint covariance patterns with experimental data. We find that control laws that actively coordinate muscle activation between the different joints generate correct variance patterns, while control laws that control each joint separately do not. Different specific forms of this coordination are compatible with the data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5688224/ /pubmed/28924748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-017-0733-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reimann, Hendrik
Schöner, Gregor
A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance
title A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance
title_full A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance
title_fullStr A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance
title_full_unstemmed A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance
title_short A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance
title_sort multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-017-0733-y
work_keys_str_mv AT reimannhendrik amultijointmodelofquietuprightstanceaccountsfortheuncontrolledmanifoldstructureofjointvariance
AT schonergregor amultijointmodelofquietuprightstanceaccountsfortheuncontrolledmanifoldstructureofjointvariance
AT reimannhendrik multijointmodelofquietuprightstanceaccountsfortheuncontrolledmanifoldstructureofjointvariance
AT schonergregor multijointmodelofquietuprightstanceaccountsfortheuncontrolledmanifoldstructureofjointvariance